Trayvon Martin "beat up" George Zimmerman for the exact same reason George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin, because he was afraid for his life.
Simply saying you are wrong should suffice, as Trayvon laid in wait for Zimmerman and effectuated his attack when Zimmerman's back was to him.
That shows your assertion to be false.
as Zimmerman was behaving extremely suspiciously during the chase and towards its conclusion.
There was no chase. Following to keep eyes on a suspicious person, is not chasing.
This is a weary exercise.
Of course it is because your position is wrong and based off fallacy.
No they are not irrelevant.
Regardless, if someone trails you in their vehicle and then jumps out and starts running after you without any indication as to why, probability goes they intend you some kind of harm. They might want to give you a million dollars, but odds are they don't.
What you say is irrelevant to Trayvon laying in wait and attacking.
Zimmerman's intent to keep eyes on Trayvon until the police arrived is reasonable.
... okay. Given how close they were to Trayvon's residence, 'pursued' seems like the more appropriate term.
It is even a more absurd description. Pursuit entails a capture. Their was no pursuit. But a person following to keep another under observation. Which there is nothing wrong with.
On the other hand, Trayvon's actions of attacking are illegal.
I'll play your game and ask, "What suspicious behavior?"
Showing you have no clue as to what the real evidence is.
Zimmerman saw Trayvon looking into the homes. And doing so while walking slowly in the rain instead of trying to get out of it. That would appear to be casing to anybody.
He helped create the situation he had to defend himself against.
That is a game you are playing.
As the same could be said about Trayvon circling Zimmerman's vehicle.
Point of fact is that Trayvon is the who acted out violently. Laying in wait and effectuating his attack when Zimmerman's back was to him.
Zimmerman did nothing to create that. That is all on Trayvon.
Zimmerman directed hostile body language (pursuing) against someone who had no concept of his intentions.
BS!
There was no pursuit.
I already told you. Because he did not have a symbol of authority or the skillset to deal with the situation.
And you are wrong. As any member of a community can and should act this way to protect their community, nor does it require any specific skill set. The only thing it requires is concern.
I said was when you pursue someone without indicating why you are pursuing someone is that your motivations are unknown to the person whom you are pursuing.
One, there was no pursuit so your narrative is off.
Trying to keep eyes on someone is not pursuit. Trying to keep eyes on a person does not entail catching as pursuing does. Nor does it entail confronting.
Trayvon was the one in error for what he may believed about this and responding violently.
Monitoring someone's location when they are trying to get away from them entails pursuing them. Nothing you do or say can change that.
Wrong!
It entails following, which is different than pursuit.
The only thing you needed to be guilty of manslaughter is (1) incompetent (2) you have to have killed someone.
Wrong!
And isn't even the case here.
So irrelevant bs on your part.
We know George Zimmerman is incompetent because his pursuit ended with him getting pummeled by someone who was rightfully in fear of their life and shooting said person.
Wrong! Trayvon laid in wait and attacked. That is not him being in fear of anything.
