Breaking:Judge denies George Zimmerman's request to delay 'stand your ground' hearing

hawke812 said:

Stupid? He just found out his son was killed, and he was hearing screams which could possibly be his son for the first time. IT is highly possible he was in a state of shock or disbelief.

Remember, these are actual people with real emotions and connections to those involved. It is completely different from us seeing/hearing evidence on the internet.

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire

Click to expand...

Excon said:

As this is a man's freedom on the line. Yes, he should be.

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

Stupid? He just found out his son was killed, and he was hearing screams which could possibly be his son for the first time. IT is highly possible he was in a state of shock or disbelief.

Remember, these are actual people with real emotions and connections to those involved. It is completely different from us seeing/hearing evidence on the internet.

Click to expand...

buck said:

Yes. Stupid explanation. Even someone that is upset is still capable of answering "yes" to a question if the voice is his sons.

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

Well then if it should be, why didn't the judge delay the trial? She heard O'Mara's request, and denied it.

How about you become a judge then, since you apparently know more than judges:lol:

Freaking back seat judges:lamo

Click to expand...

Excon said:

:doh
Meaningless drivel by you is not "fire".

When you actually have some (cough) "fire", let us know.
I am sure we all will be interested.

Click to expand...

Excon said:

:doh
You think Judges are infallible?

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

:doh
You think George (Jesus) Zimmerman is infallible?

Oh yeah right you do:lamo

Click to expand...

Excon said:

This was not "just" as he found out his son was dead.
This happened two days after his death on the 28, which he found out the day before.

Click to expand...

sharon said:

When I was told a close friend had been killed.. all I could say was a low "NO"..

Click to expand...

Excon said:

Holy ****! Where do you come up with this crap?
I have never said that, nor has anyone else.

Click to expand...

buck said:

Great. Was the cop asking you if you knew this "close friend" at the time? If so, I suspect you would have answered "Yes", not simply said "no..."

Click to expand...

buck said:

Great. Was the cop asking you if you knew this "close friend" at the time? If so, I suspect you would have answered "Yes", not simply said "no..."

Click to expand...

buck said:

Great. Was the cop asking you if you knew this "close friend" at the time? If so, I suspect you would have answered "Yes", not simply said "no..."

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

Yes, he found out the day before, and was asked if it was his son. He quietly replied "no".

Still in a state of shock and/or disbelief. He cleared it up shortly after.

Not sure why you are hanging on this. It has been resolved.

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

Bucky, you have to understand this is a real life situation, not something you read on the internet.

Things work differently in the real world:lol:

Click to expand...

sharon said:

The cops came to talk with me first.. I wasn't interviewed for four days.

Click to expand...

justabubba said:

it's salient
the father was asked if the recorded voice he heard screaming for help was his son's
he said 'no'
it was not until he realized that answer exculpated the man who killed his son from possibly being found guilty of murder that he decided to change his response
too late

Click to expand...

buck said:

Whatever allows you to stop that dissonance... When someone finds out, on Monday, that their son was killed, it is very sad. Then, when they hear a recording on Tuesday and are asked to ID the voice, they can be frigging sad as hell and still respond to a question asked by a cop.

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

Yes, he found out the day before, and was asked if it was his son. He quietly replied "no".

Still in a state of shock and/or disbelief. He cleared it up shortly after.

Not sure why you are hanging on this. It has been resolved.

Click to expand...

Excon said:

:doh
You mean he lied shortly after lawyering up with Crump.

Click to expand...

hawke812 said:

You imply that every time you post. You live, think and breath George Zimmerman.

There may be a chance he very well murdered Trayvon Martin. But you are willing to go so far as to say the prosecution, the media, civil rights activists, and even the president of the United States are out to get George Zimmerman every time a ruling, motion, or someone even farts something remotely not fully 100% positive in regards to George (Jesus) Zimmerman.

You don't have to say anything bruh:lol:

Click to expand...

Excon said:

iLOL

No I don't.
And there is no chance that he murdered him. None. The evidence does not fit that at all.

Click to expand...

Wayno said:

No doubt Zimmerman will be thrown to the wolves, so racist race hustlers like Sharpton and Jackson don't create any more problems.

But at least there's one less thug who'll be beating up bus drivers there.

Click to expand...