We know your whole premise rests on the killer telling the whole truth about the killing AND M demonstrating predatorily aggressive behavior.
With an apparent complete absence of previous predatorily aggressive behavior.
You know, where a regular kid all of a sudden decides to try to beat a stranger to death for no reason.
I don't believe Z has given an accurate account of events, whether knowingly or not.
You believe every word he says, and excuse every variance.
All the while harping on ANY vagary from the other side.
You just don't get it do you?
I suppose you never will.
There are circumstances surrounding his account that make it believable.
Those circumstance remove any doubt simply because of his being charged.
Things like immediate and continued cooperation, without regard for who may have saw what.
Some of those circumstance come from witnesses corroborating portions of his account as well as the injuries he received.
With parts being later ed by witnesses.
Lie detection testing.
Hell, Serino told Zimmerman that there was a good possibility that Trayvon had caught the whole thing on video, and Zimmerman stated that he prayed to G_D that someone had caught it on video.
Serino later acknowledges Zimmerman was happy that it had been caught on video which is "a good thing".
He was lead to believe it may have been all caught on video and he didn't change his story but was "happy it had been according to Serino.
You just would not get all these things had he been lying. It is an impossibility.
So of course his account is believable.
And then you have Serino saying that the best evidence we have so far is Zimmerman's account. As it was all adding up to what he said.
Sorry, but your position and those of your ilk, are absurd.
