• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

George Zimmerman Feb. 5th Hearing: Judge Denies Delay of Trial

There was no reason for Crump to lawyer up. His doing so is suspicious.

Is it now?

His initial agreement/understanding to take a deposition was in regards to the How, when, where, etc of the recording/recorder. This is what the judge and defense agreed upon in court.

George Zimmerman Hearing-Pt. 6 - YouTube

06:35 min. mark.

Benjamin Crump provided an affidavit, which can be used in place of a deposition.

http://www.cfnews13.com/content/dam...13/02/Ben-Crump-deposition-affidavit-0205.pdf

The defense changed course, wanting to deposition Benjamin Crump for all purposes related trial, specifically his knowledge of the case, going far beyond the initial agreement/understanding.

George Zimmerman Hearing Feb. 5 - Pt. 4 DENIED!! - YouTube

You, I, anyone else here in America WOULD IN FACT lawyer up in this situation.

Just because George Zimmerman is your God does not mean the rest of us have to worship him and forget things like protecting our rights and following the law.
 
Is it now?
Yes it is suspicious.

His initial agreement/understanding to take a deposition was in regards to the How, when, where, etc of the recording/recorder. This is what the judge and defense agreed upon in court.
Think again.
They did not say it would be limited.


Benjamin Crump provided an affidavit, which can be used in place of a deposition.
Can be if it covers what is requested, which is highly unlikely.

And it hasn't been denied but postponed.

And providing one on your own to avoid a deposition, is just more suspicious activity on Crump's part.


The defense changed course, wanting to deposition Benjamin Crump for all purposes related trial, specifically his knowledge of the case, going far beyond the initial agreement/understanding.
No that isn't exactly so.


You, I, anyone else here in America WOULD IN FACT lawyer up in this situation.
No they wouldn't.
They would do what Zimmerman has done and cooperate without lawyering up.
His inserting himself in this is suspicious.
His lawyering up is suspicious.
The fact that he has already lied to us makes it even more suspicious.


Just because George Zimmerman is your God does not mean the rest of us have to worship him and forget things like protecting our rights and following the law.
:doh
Ridiculous Traybot hyperbole on your part.


What law is "clear you can not take depositions?"
George Zimmerman Hearing Feb. 5 - Pt. 4 DENIED!! - YouTube

At the 5:17 mark.
Oy vey!

Do you not understand what is being said there?

"... so he was essentially acting in the role of the state, and the law is very clear with regard to Prosecutors, you can not take their depositions."

His lawyer is trying to twist the facts.
He wasn't essentially doing anything but trying to spin a yarn.

What the lawyer states doesn't apply to Crump as he is not a Prosecutor.
Nor does the law say if one is acting on their own in the capacity of Prosecutor interviewing witnesses. :doh
iLOL
What a ridiculous assertion on his and your part. Too bad you didn't understand what you had heard.
And before you respond saying you had, it is obvious that you didn't because you would not have stated #'s 3 & 4 in post #22 if you had.
 
"... so he was essentially acting in the role of the state, and the law is very clear with regard to Prosecutors, you can not take their depositions."

His lawyer is trying to twist the facts.
He wasn't essentially doing anything but trying to spin a yarn.

What the lawyer states doesn't apply to Crump as he is not a Prosecutor.
Nor does the law say if one is acting on their own in the capacity of Prosecutor interviewing witnesses. :doh

Wait, you mean Crump is not the attorney general? Geeze. I'm shocked... If you can't trust a lawyer who can you trust?
 
Wait, you mean Crump is not the attorney general? Geeze. I'm shocked... If you can't trust a lawyer who can you trust?

No one ever said he was. Stop trying to spin things for your obvious biased agenda.

He was acting in the capacity of Prosecutor. Get your facts straight.
 
No one ever said he was. Stop trying to spin things for your obvious biased agenda.

He was acting in the capacity of Prosecutor. Get your facts straight.

She may prevent his deposition or limit it in some way... But I can guarantee that it will not be based on the claim that he was acting as the attorney general. That is a silly claim and the fact that you actually fall for it would discuss your bias more so then mine.
 
Excerpt

What's next for George Zimmerman's case?

Our legal expert says a self-defense immunity hearing will come before a trial in June.


“It’s going to be a mini trial with the Stand Your Ground hearing. And you can expect one. And you expect one to be lost by the defense,” said Nejame.


During that hearing, it’s likely that Zimmerman will take the stand, and Nejame said that’s a prosecutor’s dream.


That could be a nightmare for the defense. Zimmerman will have to make more statements, all compared to previous ones.


“My biggest criticism of the way this case has played out from the defense perspective so far is that Mr. Zimmerman stated some things in a bond hearing and stated some things on national TV and made statements,” Nejame told News 13.


The prosecution will line up all of Zimmerman’s statements to look for inconsistencies.


For a case relying on the word of George Zimmerman in relation to what happened the night Trayvon Martin was shot and killed, honesty will mean everything.
 
Excerpt

What's next for George Zimmerman's case?

Our legal expert says a self-defense immunity hearing will come before a trial in June.


“It’s going to be a mini trial with the Stand Your Ground hearing. And you can expect one. And you expect one to be lost by the defense,” said Nejame.


During that hearing, it’s likely that Zimmerman will take the stand, and Nejame said that’s a prosecutor’s dream.


That could be a nightmare for the defense. Zimmerman will have to make more statements, all compared to previous ones.


“My biggest criticism of the way this case has played out from the defense perspective so far is that Mr. Zimmerman stated some things in a bond hearing and stated some things on national TV and made statements,” Nejame told News 13.


The prosecution will line up all of Zimmerman’s statements to look for inconsistencies.


For a case relying on the word of George Zimmerman in relation to what happened the night Trayvon Martin was shot and killed, honesty will mean everything.

Yeah, Zimmerman is toast...with jelly...and butter...
 

Yes you are finished.

The things you have said in regard to this case are some of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. May God have mercy on your soul.
 
No one ever said he was. Stop trying to spin things for your obvious biased agenda.

He was acting in the capacity of Prosecutor. Get your facts straight.
:naughty

No!
He was not acting in such a regard.
Nor could he, as he was not a prosecutor.
 
Excerpt

What's next for George Zimmerman's case?

Our legal expert says a self-defense immunity hearing will come before a trial in June.


“It’s going to be a mini trial with the Stand Your Ground hearing. And you can expect one. And you expect one to be lost by the defense,” said Nejame.


During that hearing, it’s likely that Zimmerman will take the stand, and Nejame said that’s a prosecutor’s dream.


That could be a nightmare for the defense. Zimmerman will have to make more statements, all compared to previous ones.


“My biggest criticism of the way this case has played out from the defense perspective so far is that Mr. Zimmerman stated some things in a bond hearing and stated some things on national TV and made statements,” Nejame told News 13.


The prosecution will line up all of Zimmerman’s statements to look for inconsistencies.


For a case relying on the word of George Zimmerman in relation to what happened the night Trayvon Martin was shot and killed, honesty will mean everything.
Which is why Zimmerman will walk.
 
Into his cell?
Oh looky here.
Another thing that you do not seem to understand.
Go figure, huh?
"Walk" as used in context means, "is set free", which has absolutely noting to do with a cell, as it is opposite.
 
Oh looky here.
Another thing that you do not seem to understand.
Go figure, huh?
"Walk" as used in context means, "is set free", which has absolutely noting to do with a cell, as it is opposite.

So he will walk after serving <X> amount of years behind bars?

Yeah we know, just not jumping that far ahead. Still have to go through the trial.
 
Back
Top Bottom