• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Florida Statutes "JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE"... Prove this doesn't apply to Z

hawke812 said:
Nice one:lol:

Owen's Biometric technology has already assisted in convicting Davalloo of murder. He even states the 911 call was much better quality.

Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman 911 call analysis: Two forensic experts say it's not George Zimmerman crying out for help - Orlando Sentinel

Also in the article, another expert ruled out Zimmerman using another tech.

All you have is, "not used in FEDERAL courts":lol:

Well, this is not FEDERAL court now is it? It is the STATE of FLORIDA. Go ahead and have him testify, it has been used in a state court before:lol:

TM still up 1-2 points:lol:
Click to expand...
Owen is discredit by what he himself says is required to make such an examinnation.
This has already been gone over multiple times.
He is worthless as an analyst in this case.
 
hawke812 said:
All I can realistically do is present the state's evidence against the defendant, discuss it's strengths and make a prediction on whether he will be found guilty of all charges based upon Florida laws.

So your false claim that "I have" evidence is misleading.

Based upon the state's evidence against the defendant, as has been posted and discussed, I predict he will be found guilty.

You can disagree all you want, but we will both have to wait until the immunity hearing and/or trial.

It is kind of cute how you want to "win" one for Zimmerman here on the forums:lol:
Click to expand...

You don't even know what an immunity hearing is much less a criminal trial
 
Excon said:
Owen is discredit by what he himself says is required to make such an examinnation.
This has already been gone over multiple times.
He is worthless as an analyst in this case.
Click to expand...

He is less than worthless
 
hawke812 said:
I countered your expert with saying Owen's tech is not admissable in FEDERAL courts by showing you his testimony was used at the STATE level. Nothing more, nothing less.

That is why I said TM was up 1-2 points. I will give you that, but I believe Owen's tech will be admissible, since this is a STATE matter.

TM still up 1.

And the FBI? Who cares. TM still up son:lol:
Click to expand...

well the jury will most likely care what the FBI lab has to say.
I agree, you don't care or your opinion matter.:mrgreen:
 
JackFrost said:
What was that again ric ole boy?

:lamo:lamo:lamo
Click to expand...

You look foolish finding old threads to smear, the lovable ric when you have pressing matters like plagiarism to attend to

Ok, now...the immunity hearing is still very much on the table. Z's lawyers can *still* raise the issue/file the motion just before trial.
 
ric27 said:
You look foolish finding old threads to smear, the lovable ric when you have pressing matters like plagiarism to attend to

Ok, now...the immunity hearing is still very much on the table. Z's lawyers can *still* raise the issue/file the motion just before trial.
Click to expand...
But they won't.

Watch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom