• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Jose Baez Comments On Zimmerman Case

JackFrost

Banned
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
3,471
Reaction score
513
Location
El Monte, California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Video | News, Entertainment, Politics | Orlando and Florida News

Jose Baez:

  • Trayvon Martin Case not on same level as Casey Anthony in the National spotlight
  • Casey Anthony had more unknown, people tried to figure things out
  • Chris Serino wants the truth to come out
  • Casey Anthony had more mystery, longer time-frame. Trayvon Martin case has two minutes
  • "NOT ON MY WATCH! Det. Chris Serino will not be the fall guy!
 
You will cling to anything won't you sharon?

Now how about you present proof that Zimmerman wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, when he shot Travon Martin?

The reason that video is so good is because ith contrasts his lies side by side..

By now you must know that George was 300 feet from his car... He wasn't walking back to it.
 
The reason that video is so good is because ith contrasts his lies side by side..

By now you must know that George was 300 feet from his car... He wasn't walking back to it.

Now how about you present proof that Zimmerman wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, when he shot Travon Martin?
 
Now how about you present proof that Zimmerman wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, when he shot Travon Martin?

If George is absolutely justified by the law, why has he lied his butt off?
 
If George is absolutely justified by the law, why has he lied his butt off?

I don't believe he has... You are nit-picking his words and focusing in on details that just don't matter one damned bit.

Now again... How about you present proof that Zimmerman wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, when he shot Travon Martin?
 
This is very good.
Since when did idiotic get substituted with good?


The reason that video is so good is because ith contrasts his lies side by side..
It does no such thing, so again, when did idiotic get substituted with good?


By now you must know that George was 300 feet from his car... He wasn't walking back to it.
No sharon he was walking back to his truck, just as he said he was.
 
Since when did idiotic get substituted with good?



It does no such thing, so again, when did idiotic get substituted with good?



No sharon he was walking back to his truck, just as he said he was.

You haven't read any of the documents or interviews in evidence, have you?
 
You haven't read any of the documents or interviews in evidence, have you?
Yes I have sharon, I have. And unlike the Trayvon acolytes, I also understand them.
 
You haven't read any of the documents or interviews in evidence, have you?

How about you present proof that Zimmerman wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, when he shot Travon Martin?
 
How about you present proof that Zimmerman wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, when he shot Travon Martin?

Why don't you let a judge and/or jury decide that? Oh right, because they will O*B*L*I*T*E*R*A*T*E GZ's defense:lol:
 
You haven't read any of the documents or interviews in evidence, have you?

You believe that the defendant *Z* is probably guilty, right?
 
Why don't you let a judge and/or jury decide that? Oh right, because they will O*B*L*I*T*E*R*A*T*E GZ's defense:lol:

You believe that Z is guilty but the evidence falls a little short and so you cannot find Z is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, correct?
 
Why don't you let a judge and/or jury decide that? Oh right, because they will O*B*L*I*T*E*R*A*T*E GZ's defense:lol:

That's what I thought... You can't provide any evidence that he wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, because as far as we know, no such evidence exists...

It's about time you got a little reality check hawke.
 
You believe that Z is guilty but the evidence falls a little short and so you cannot find Z is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, correct?

That would be the only logical conclusion, therefore....
 
I wanted hawke to finish that one, but of course you are correct.

Don't worry....

There's more for the not too dynamic duo

Based upon the evidence presented to all, we *Sharon and Hawke* believe that the defendant is probably guilty

Therefore....
 
That's what I thought... You can't provide any evidence that he wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, because as far as we know, no such evidence exists...

It's about time you got a little reality check hawke.

A fool's foolishness resulted in the death of a young person and y'all are gleeful that hes gonna walk.

I agree we should err on the side of innocent until proven guilty, but this is NOT something worth celebrating.
 
That's what I thought... You can't provide any evidence that he wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, because as far as we know, no such evidence exists...

It's about time you got a little reality check hawke.

"As far as we know"...:lamo

You mean cherry picking information you want to believe and dismiss:lol:

Unlike you, I take every bit of evidence, those favorable to TM, and those favorable to GZ, then make a prediction on the outcome of the case based upon all evidence.


Look, I am sorry if my opinion offends you, but I believe GZ will be found guilty. I have already provided all the evidence I believe will help the state successfully prosecute GZ. If you believe it is not enough, that is fine. What can I do about it. It is in the hands of the court.

Do you really want to have this case settled on the DP forums, really? Because that is what you are doing:lol:
 
A fool's foolishness resulted in the death of a young person and y'all are gleeful that hes gonna walk.

I agree we should err on the side of innocent until proven guilty, but this is NOT something worth celebrating.
Unless you are saying it was Trayvon's actions that lead to his death, you are wrong.
A person acted in self defense against a person acting out violently.
He should be cleared of any wrong doing.

And when he is, it should be a cause for celebration.
A celebration of the "right" to defend one's self against an aggressor trying to kill you.





You mean cherry picking information you want to believe and dismiss

Unlike you, I take every bit of evidence, those favorable to TM, and those favorable to GZ, then make a prediction on the outcome of the case based upon all evidence.
:doh:lamo:doh:lamo:doh
Holy ****!
You are the one who cherry picks and disregards actual evidence, while not even not taking it in as a whole.
 
"As far as we know"...:lamo

You mean cherry picking information you want to believe and dismiss:lol:

LMAO... You are the most dishonest individual hawke.

Unlike you, I take every bit of evidence, those favorable to TM, and those favorable to GZ, then make a prediction on the outcome of the case based upon all evidence.


Look, I am sorry if my opinion offends you, but I believe GZ will be found guilty. I have already provided all the evidence I believe will help the state successfully prosecute GZ. If you believe it is not enough, that is fine. What can I do about it. It is in the hands of the court.

Do you really want to have this case settled on the DP forums, really? Because that is what you are doing:lol:

Your response seems to be missing something hawke... It's missing any evidence that proves that Zimmerman wasn't acting in self defense according to Florida law, when he shot Travon Martin...

Why is that hawke?
 
Back
Top Bottom