• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Blood Tells No Lies...& Gravity: Evidence Indicates GZ On Top!

You have never shown one piece of evidence to back up your claims. You can't just say something, and expect it to be true.

So by your logic:

1. You can touch liquid for seconds, and not have any on your hands or clothing
2. Blood does not come out of the body until AFTER you have shot someone and stood up
:doh
No!
:naughty

That is your logic, or again, lack there of.

There would not have been blood to touch until after Zimmerman got into an upright position. It would have been going down his throat.

And the evidence is how things naturally work. Not this make believe bs you are engaged in.



Evidence? No? Ah right just more lies you try to conceal as fact:lol:
:naughty
That is the evidence.

Trayvon could have approached Zimmerman head on but didn't, he decided to lay in wait until after Zimmerman turned around and was heading away from him.

That is the evidence.
 
Wow, people still care about this?

Maybe we should start talking about Terri Schiavo again.

I will stay on this until the judge swings her mighty hammer of justice down and the jury declares, "Guilty"....and even after to gloat at all the people here.

*Bookmarked*

I just hope Z supporters don't jump ship and leave the DP forums:lol:
 
Actually I think the evidence indicates Z killed Trayvon. I am not quite sure where you came up with your "evidence."

If you do not know the evidence please go and learn it before trying to engage those who do, as it is not "my" evidence, but the case evidence.
 
:doh
No!
:naughty

That is your logic, or again, lack there of.

There would not have been blood to touch until after Zimmerman got into an upright position. It would have been going down his throat.

And the evidence is how things naturally work. Not this make believe bs you are engaged in.




:naughty
That is the evidence.

Trayvon could have approached Zimmerman head on but didn't, he decided to lay in wait until after Zimmerman turned around and was heading away from him.

That is the evidence.

Oh and I love your evidence...which is you saying the word evidence..:lamo
 
Last edited:
Not talking about the law. I would have a hard time killing someone over my property. Home invasion, if I or my family was home their mere entery give me a reason to be in fear of my life, so fire away. At some point during the car jacking I woudl be in fear of my life and would feel fine firing away. As soon as they took the car and did not intend to harm me or others, I woud not feel I had a moral justification to shoot them. Adultry? Fraud, never. how bout horse thieves?
Unrelated to the GZ/TM toppic....imo lethal force should be loosened up and allowable in more situations, such as car theft, home invasion, adultery and fraud. You should have the authority to kill the offenders in those cases.
 
I will stay on this until the judge swings her mighty hammer of justice down and the jury declares, "Guilty"....and even after to gloat at all the people here.

*Bookmarked*

I just hope Z supporters don't jump ship and leave the DP forums:lol:
Ignoring you gloating is exactly how you will be trolled :2wave:
 
Z killed Trayvon. I dont think there is any question about that. the rest, at this point is questionable.
If you do not know the evidence please go and learn it before trying to engage those who do, as it is not "my" evidence, but the case evidence.
 
If you do not know the evidence please go and learn it before trying to engage those who do, as it is not "my" evidence, but the case evidence.

Correct, you have no evidence. The only evidence that matters indicate GZ is guilty of 2nd degree murder.
 
Not talking about the law. I would have a hard time killing someone over my property. Home invasion, if I or my family was home their mere entery give me a reason to be in fear of my life, so fire away. At some point during the car jacking I woudl be in fear of my life and would feel fine firing away. As soon as they took the car and did not intend to harm me or others, I woud not feel I had a moral justification to shoot them. Adultry? Fraud, never. how bout horse thieves?
I get the whole 'in fear for your life' thing, I just think lethal force should be permissible in some situations where you life is not in danger yet you are incredibly harmed.
 
So Z's blood on the back of his head...would be going down his throat...:lamo

Oh and I love your evidence...which is you saying the word evidence..:lamo
You seem to be confused between two separate things here and have an inability to keep focused on what was being discussed.
Maybe it is purposeful?

The blood that You say Trayvon would have gotten on his hands is what we were discussing.
I am pretty sure you know that. AS I am sure you understand that the blood from the broken nose would have been following the path of least resistance. Which would have been going down his throat until he got in an upright position.


Just as I am sure you realize that Zimmerman had more time in the upright position to bleed.
But instead of recognizing that which you should know, you choose to ignore it in favor of this grasping you are doing.
 
Z killed Trayvon. I dont think there is any question about that. the rest, at this point is questionable.
And it was totally justified. Not that GZ is some kind of model citizen or anything, but he killed a gang-banger, and that should always be rewarded. You should be able to go to a sporting goods store and buy a hunting license and bag tag for gang members and legally hunt them just as you can game. The more gang-banger and wannabees die, the better.
 
the rest, at this point is questionable.
Actually it isn't, except for those who have a hard time grasping reality.
 
Correct, you have no evidence. The only evidence that matters indicate GZ is guilty of 2nd degree murder.
And there you have it folks.
He shows again that he knows not of which he speaks.
 
Z killed Trayvon. I dont think there is any question about that. the rest, at this point is questionable.

There is no one on this forum that I have seen has not agreed to that GZ shot TM and TM died from the resulting gun shot wound. What some have said they believe the shooting was justified, and some say it was not. That is what the trial will sort out.
It also is interesting that those that support TM seem to play the debate that TM did nothing to initiate or escalate the situation that resulted in the shooting. That also is something the jury will have to sort out.

I personally believe GZ and TM made some very bad decisions that night in which lead to TM death. I also tend to have the opinion that GZ did fear for his life. I do not think Murder 2 is appropriate in this case. That said, I can live with whatever the jury decides. They will have heard and seen more evidence that we all have from the internet or news. If found guilty, so be it. If found not guilty, will those on the TM side support the jury / court ruling.
 
And there you have it folks.
He shows again that he knows not of which he speaks.

And there you have it folks.
He shows again that he knows not of which he speaks.

And there you have it folks.
He shows again that he knows not of which he speaks.

And there you have it folks.
He shows again that he knows not of which he speaks.

And there you have it folks.
He shows again that he knows not of which he speaks.

And there you have it folks.
He shows again that he knows not of which he speaks.
 
There is no one on this forum that I have seen has not agreed to that GZ shot TM and TM died from the resulting gun shot wound. What some have said they believe the shooting was justified, and some say it was not. That is what the trial will sort out.
It also is interesting that those that support TM seem to play the debate that TM did nothing to initiate or escalate the situation that resulted in the shooting. That also is something the jury will have to sort out.

I personally believe GZ and TM made some very bad decisions that night in which lead to TM death. I also tend to have the opinion that GZ did fear for his life. I do not think Murder 2 is appropriate in this case. That said, I can live with whatever the jury decides. They will have heard and seen more evidence that we all have from the internet or news. If found guilty, so be it. If found not guilty, will those on the TM side support the jury / court ruling.

It also is interesting that those that support GZ seem to play the debate that GZ did nothing to initiate or escalate the situation that resulted in the shooting.
 
And it was totally justified. Not that GZ is some kind of model citizen or anything, but he killed a gang-banger, and that should always be rewarded. You should be able to go to a sporting goods store and buy a hunting license and bag tag for gang members and legally hunt them just as you can game. The more gang-banger and wannabees die, the better.

Oh wow, an outright lie. Not surprised.
 
It also is interesting that those that support GZ seem to play the debate that GZ did nothing to initiate or escalate the situation that resulted in the shooting.

and that is why I have said the trial and the jury will decide. Unlike you, who have GZ tied to up to the needle already.

So if the jury lets GZ go, will you accept the decision?
 
I have carried a firearm most of my life. When I do I dont get to make bad decisions. TM should have been able to, skittles and Dew are not that deadly. Again I know very few facts, but Zman shot TM and TM was a minor and is dead. Not much there to discuss as far as I can see.
There is no one on this forum that I have seen has not agreed to that GZ shot TM and TM died from the resulting gun shot wound. What some have said they believe the shooting was justified, and some say it was not. That is what the trial will sort out.
It also is interesting that those that support TM seem to play the debate that TM did nothing to initiate or escalate the situation that resulted in the shooting. That also is something the jury will have to sort out.

I personally believe GZ and TM made some very bad decisions that night in which lead to TM death. I also tend to have the opinion that GZ did fear for his life. I do not think Murder 2 is appropriate in this case. That said, I can live with whatever the jury decides. They will have heard and seen more evidence that we all have from the internet or news. If found guilty, so be it. If found not guilty, will those on the TM side support the jury / court ruling.
 
I have carried a firearm most of my life. When I do I dont get to make bad decisions. TM should have been able to, skittles and Dew are not that deadly. Again I know very few facts, but Zman shot TM and TM was a minor and is dead. Not much there to discuss as far as I can see.

and the critical part of your state is " I know very few facts,".

and once again no acknowledgement that TM's decisions also led to the final outcome.

Glad to see your a responsible gun owner. Now let me ask you, if you were in an altercation that at some point you feared for your life, would you use your firearm?
 
You seem to be confused between two separate things here and have an inability to keep focused on what was being discussed.
Maybe it is purposeful?

The blood that You say Trayvon would have gotten on his hands is what we were discussing.
I am pretty sure you know that. AS I am sure you understand that the blood from the broken nose would have been following the path of least resistance. Which would have been going down his throat until he got in an upright position.


Just as I am sure you realize that Zimmerman had more time in the upright position to bleed.
But instead of recognizing that which you should know, you choose to ignore it in favor of this grasping you are doing.

Except you ignore the forty feet or so Z stumbled down the path AFTER being punched in the nose.

By the reenactment.
 
Back
Top Bottom