- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 12,316
- Reaction score
- 3,220
- Location
- Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Never, this case will never to to trial.
That's an odd opinion. Why do you think so?
Never, this case will never to to trial.
That's an odd opinion. Why do you think so?
All that I have heard and read the prosecution does not have any "solid" evidence of wrong doing by Zimmerman. All these threads are full of hate for Z but nothing based on facts of the case. People state this and that which is all speculation based on no hard evidence to back up any of those claims. Zimmerman a free man.
Read Post 48 and you'll see what I mean.
Zimmerman: The Power of Circumstantial Evidence - Zimmerman: The Power of Circumstantial Evidence « Frederick Leatherman Law Blog
What "hard" and/or "solid" evidence are you referring to? No one saw Scott Peterson kill Laci Peterson. You do not NEED to have a witness present for the entirety of a murder for someone to be convicted of murder.
Zimmerman: The Power of Circumstantial Evidence - Zimmerman: The Power of Circumstantial Evidence « Frederick Leatherman Law Blog
What "hard" and/or "solid" evidence are you referring to? No one saw Scott Peterson kill Laci Peterson. You do not NEED to have a witness present for the entirety of a murder for someone to be convicted of murder.
A man with a gun shot and killed an unarmed teenager. It's quite simple.
A man with a gun shot and killed an unarmed teenager. It's quite simple.
That is my point there is none. Further did you not know that an eye witness is not a good witness, so that leaves circumstantial evidence and there is none.
That is over simplistic.
Once again, someone completely ignoring the actions of TM that lead to the deadly ending.
And someone completely ignoring the actions of GZ that lead to the deadly ending:roll:
Zimmerman: The Power of Circumstantial Evidence - Zimmerman: The Power of Circumstantial Evidence « Frederick Leatherman Law Blog
What "hard" and/or "solid" evidence are you referring to? No one saw Scott Peterson kill Laci Peterson. You do not NEED to have a witness present for the entirety of a murder for someone to be convicted of murder.
List *those* actions
If it's so simple, when a guy is getting his head bashed into the concrete what is he supposed to do? Take it and die, or defend himself? That is an easy question, pick one if it's so simple. But you already answered the question, "take it and die" sorry but that is the wrong answer, in this country we have the right to defend ourselves. And I might add Florida goes one step further, it has a "stand your ground" law.
This case will never go to trial, Z was defending himself and is a free man. But of course there are many like you that think Z should have continued to take his head bashing and died instead of defending himself. I wonder is you would have defended yourself, or let yourself be bashed to death. Oh that's right you already answered that, you would not have defended yourself. You would rather have died like a slaughtered lamb, than defend yourself.
For what purpose? TM's actions were not listed, why should GZ's be listed? At least provide a reason for doing so, not just a command. That is very rude.
What are you trying to argue? There is no circumstantial evidence
When I saw pictures of the back of Z's head, it looked like 6 or 7 bleeding cuts were made by an x-acto knife. I've had worse scratches than that on my eyeball. What kind of concrete makes straight-line cuts that look like those shown in the picture? Razor concrete?
I think that is what I said. There is none.
Copping out?...it figures lol
Get something straight
1 M initiated both the verbal and physical encounter thus M attacked Z without legal provocation and
2 Z's injuries are consistent with his version of the attack plus witnesses' statements the night of the shooting back up Z's account.
That is why an eye witness is not a good witness, and you just proved that. What you saw may not even be close to exactly what damage was created, and it was not just one wound but several, so if your head is being bashed into the concrete you may be at a point of being knocked out, in which the perp could continue his bashing until your dead. But you have already said you would just take the bashing and die like a slaughtered lamb, rather than defend yourself.
When I saw pictures of the back of Z's head, it looked like 6 or 7 bleeding cuts were made by an x-acto knife. I've had worse scratches than that on my eyeball. What kind of concrete makes straight-line cuts that look like those shown in the picture? Razor concrete?
I was kinda hoping this thread would be about what motived a person to form their opinion, rather than repeating the arguments already repeated on 50 other threads like this is the abortion board. But I guess threads evolve as they do. :roll:
1. Speculation by a Z-supporter. I am surprised...:lol:
2. Z's injuries are consistent with anything but his description of the altercation:lol: