• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Sad case of mistaken intentions

Crosscheck said:
Actually many here assumed he was guilty just because he wore a hoodie. Now they are trying to make everything fit their agenda.
Click to expand...

Totally ridiculous....

Z never said he found the hoodie suspicious. Remember, it was, the call taker that asked what the suspect was wearing and Z responded, saying what he was wearing a hoodie

Z never volunteered the info -- only when, he was asked
 
ric27 said:
Totally ridiculous....

Z never said he found the hoodie suspicious. Remember, it was, the call taker that asked what the suspect was wearing and Z responded, saying what he was wearing a hoodie

Z never volunteered the info -- only when, he was asked
Click to expand...

You must be new to this thread.

I didn't say anything about Z commenting on the hoodie, now did I? I said many here focused on it. Even Geraldo Rivera got into the stage and made statements that he didn't want his kids wearing a hoodie. So if you wear a hoodie in the rain you must be a bad guy.

Just look at Coach Bill Belichick of the pats and you can tell he belongs to a street gang.
 
Crosscheck said:
You must be new to this thread.

I didn't say anything about Z commenting on the hoodie, now did I? I said many here focused on it. Even Geraldo Rivera got into the stage and made statements that he didn't want his kids wearing a hoodie. So if you wear a hoodie in the rain you must be a bad guy.

Just look at Coach Bill Belichick of the pats and you can tell he belongs to a street gang.
Click to expand...

Not applicable or pertinent....Stick to matters relevant to proving the criminal charges.

Its Z's life that's on the balance not Rivera's or, the Joe Blows of the world
 
ric27 said:
Not applicable or pertinent....Stick to matters relevant to proving the criminal charges.

Its Z's life that's on the balance not Rivera's or, the Joe Blows of the world
Click to expand...

Crosscheck said:
Actually many here assumed he was guilty just because he wore a hoodie. Now they are trying to make everything fit their agenda.
Click to expand...

ric27 said:
Totally ridiculous....
Z never said he found the hoodie suspicious. Remember, it was, the call taker that asked what the suspect was wearing and Z responded, saying what he was wearing a hoodie

Z never volunteered the info -- only when, he was asked
Click to expand...


How about if you are going to reply to one's posting you read it correctly. That would be a good start for you.
 
Crosscheck said:
How about if you are going to reply to one's posting you read it correctly. That would be a good start for you.
Click to expand...

How about you stick issues based on direct evidence -- what people saw and heard and physical evidence, eh?

But, you know what, I'm willing to entertain the idea that there was something actually strange about M's behavior. Why aren't you?
 
ric27 said:
How about you stick issues based on direct evidence -- what people saw and heard and physical evidence, eh?

But, you know what, I'm willing to entertain the idea that there was something actually strange about M's behavior. Why aren't you?
Click to expand...

I like how you fail to comprehend what he actually posted.
 
Just curious...when you look at the police video of George being interviewed...and quite possibly when he was doing a polygraph...and then compare the questions with his answers with the transcript of the 911 call...there are differences. It's not that I was hearing George lie. I think it was more related to how the questions were framed and the types of questions he was asked.

Dunno...maybe the way I did the comparisons aren't the correct way to align one story against the other. I'm certainly not an expert so....???

Just wondering if anybody else noticed any differences or contrasts in versions of what happened?
 
Removable Mind said:
Just curious...when you look at the police video of George being interviewed...and quite possibly when he was doing a polygraph...and then compare the questions with his answers with the transcript of the 911 call...there are differences. It's not that I was hearing George lie. I think it was more related to how the questions were framed and the types of questions he was asked.

Dunno...maybe the way I did the comparisons aren't the correct way to align one story against the other. I'm certainly not an expert so....???

Just wondering if anybody else noticed any differences or contrasts in versions of what happened?
Click to expand...

Yes, this video compares all of his tales. Part two is embedded in the video at the end. There are identical questions asked multiple times, which he responds with different answers.

George Zimmerman Caught Lying About Trayvon Martin Incident [FULL] - YouTube
 
So the expections to some is a person will answer exactly the same (detail by detail) when questioned multiply times after a tramatic event.

That does not happen. Sometimes more detail comes out. Sometimes a detail is left out when asked the same question over time.
IMO, if a person did give the exact same answer 100% of the time I would think it was strange. One should look if the answer trend is consisant.

This has been my experience in doing accident investations involving deaths on wildfires or burnovers.
 
Removable Mind said:
Just curious...when you look at the police video of George being interviewed...and quite possibly when he was doing a polygraph...and then compare the questions with his answers with the transcript of the 911 call...there are differences. It's not that I was hearing George lie. I think it was more related to how the questions were framed and the types of questions he was asked.

Dunno...maybe the way I did the comparisons aren't the correct way to align one story against the other. I'm certainly not an expert so....???

Just wondering if anybody else noticed any differences or contrasts in versions of what happened?
Click to expand...

A very good question and one I don't know the answer to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom