• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their eyes?

Are you George Zimmerman?

  • Yes-someone walking, breathing and using their eyes warrants a police officer response

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • No-these are normal actions of a human being

    Votes: 4 57.1%

  • Total voters
    7
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

So do you think the state should bring a case before a jury/judge based upon unproven assumptions and lies?

Another example of why some of the anti-GZ people really don't have integrity in their "debating."

You did not say you "disagree." You said items are known factually false.

When an affidavit is learned to be substantively inaccurate, minimally it is replaced with a truthful one.
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

1. No it does not

2. The actions of TM were in response to GZ's actions. It would be more accurate to say if not for GZ actions, TM would be alive today.
1.)Yes. Police being dispatched does indicate it was warranted. You can't change that.
To claim otherwise is absurd.

2.)Wrong again.
It is more accurate to say Zimmerman was responding to the suspicious actions of Trayvon.
But not for Trayvon acting suspiciously and looking into windows of the homes, Trayvon would be alive today.
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

1.)Yes. Police being dispatched does indicate it was warranted. You can't change that.
To claim otherwise is absurd.

2.)Wrong again.
It is more accurate to say Zimmerman was responding to the suspicious actions of Trayvon.
But not for Trayvon acting suspiciously and looking into windows of the homes, Trayvon would be alive today.

But for TM actually having even a half-ass parenting father he would be alive today.
But for TM being a constant f... up in school he would be alive today.
But for TM engaging in felony criminal assault he would be alive today.
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

So do you think the state should bring a case before a jury/judge based upon unproven assumptions and lies?

I disagree.

Objection! Leading the witness:lol:

Why bother asking a question if you are going to answer it anyways:roll:
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

But for TM actually having even a half-ass parenting father he would be alive today.
But for TM being a constant f... up in school he would be alive today.

But for TM engaging in felony criminal assault he would be alive today.

A sheep getting all his information from the lamestream media would say this:roll:

Here are some facts for you to digest:

1. I am right.
2. You are wrong.

Deal with it:cool:
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

A sheep getting all his information from the lamestream media would say this:roll:

Here are some facts for you to digest:

1. I am right.
2. You are wrong.

Deal with it:cool:

what kind of father allows his son to roam the streets at night after he just got suspended for the 3rd time?
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

what kind of father allows his son to roam the streets at night after he just got suspended for the 3rd time?

Another logical fallacy from a GZer:roll:

TM goes to the store. Your spin of that is "roam the streets". Try again:lol:
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

Another logical fallacy from a GZer:roll:

TM goes to the store. Your spin of that is "roam the streets". Try again:lol:

If he was simply going to the store...he would have been home before GZ ever "confronted" him. The timelines show this. but hey, keep ignoring the facts

what kind of father leaves his son home alone unsupervised after he just got suspended from school for the third time for drugs?
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

If he was simply going to the store...he would have been home before GZ ever "confronted" him. The timelines show this. but hey, keep ignoring the facts

what kind of father leaves his son home alone unsupervised after he just got suspended from school for the third time for drugs?

Here is the imaginary "timeline" again, with no proof to back it up:lol:
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

Here is the imaginary "timeline" again, with no proof to back it up:lol:

I has been posted dozens of times. it is not my fault you are presumably too stupid to read it
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

I has been posted dozens of times. it is not my fault you are presumably too stupid to read it

:funny

Never start a post with "I has been posted" and then follow up with calling someone stupid:lol:
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

:funny

Never start a post with "I has been posted" and then follow up with calling someone stupid:lol:

I didn't call you stupid. please learn to read
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

I didn't call you stupid. please learn to read


^ Would you like me to do it for you? :lol:

Once again, the grammar policing of noob "Hawk" who joined last month - when noob Furiounova did - is wrong.

"I have been posted" is not an improper beginning to a sentence. To date, I have been posted on this forum 7,550 times.

I think English isn't Hawk's first language. Seriously, though, we shouldn't be prejudiced and hold that against Hawk.
 
Last edited:
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

^ Would you like me to do it for you? :lol:

Once again, the grammar policing of noob "Hawk" who joined last month - when noob Furiounova did - is wrong.

"I have been posted" is not an improper beginning to a sentence. To date, I have been posted on this forum 7,550 times.

I think English isn't Hawk's first language. Seriously, though, we shouldn't be prejudiced and hold that against Hawk.

I can only presume he has some kind of mental defect. call me lazy but I never preview my posts prior to submitting them. I failed to notice that I didn't hit the "t" key hard enough for it to register. but since he can't refute anything we post, he tries to score points by bleating about typos and alleged errors in grammar.
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

^ Would you like me to do it for you? :lol:

Once again, the grammar policing of noob "Hawk" who joined last month - when noob Furiounova did - is wrong.

"I have been posted" is not an improper beginning to a sentence. To date, I have been posted on this forum 7,550 times.

I think English isn't Hawk's first language. Seriously, though, we shouldn't be prejudiced and hold that against Hawk.

OscarB wrote "I has been posted", NOT "I have been posted".

English is not my first language:roll:

Way to go JOKO!!!:lamo
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

OscarB wrote "I has been posted", NOT "I have been posted".

English is not my first language:roll:

Way to go JOKO!!!:lamo

and you prove it yet again. "I has been posted", though not what I intended to post, is a grammatically correct sentence. and it is factually correct since the word "I" has literally been posted on this forum thousands of times.

every time you try to "gotcha" someone you just end up making yourself look more foolish
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

i3.jpg
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

You make stuff up, then posting 100 times as if it proves anything.
First, you have NEVER proven the only reason for burglaries was unsecured doors and windows.
Second, contrary to your suggestion, burglary isn't legalized if a person doesn't have brace bars on their doors and windows.
Nor do you have anything to show that person you name is responsible for all burglaries that happened, no is that relevant - other than is shows you instant presumption of guilt IF the presumption serves you prejudices. There is no evidence that person committed all the burglaries - but you assert it is true because you make up truth to make claims - a pointless habit of yours in messages.

Read the individual police reports... NO FORCED ENTRY.
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

Read the individual police reports... NO FORCED ENTRY.

I have a feeling this is like your claim that George always met the police at the clubhouse mailbox... But then when you actualyl listen to the calls you find that was an outright lie. He met that at places other then the clubhouse/sidewalk.
 
Re: Have you ever called the police on a person walking, breathing and using their ey

Yes.. he stated that he did because he had a poor memory.. and ADD.

Have you seen this slideshow?

Community Of Sanford, Florida Awaits Trayvon Martin Shooting Trial - Pictures - Zimbio

There is nothing in that link about Zimmerman always meeting the police at the clubhouse. If you will post a link to that and give me the approximate time in the video I should listen to, I will listen. Then, I will post one of the 911 calls in which he did not meet at the clubhouse. That is normally how this sort of thing works.

Instead, you make an erroneous claim, post a link not at all related to your claim and complain that no one is reading your links. That is not how normal people would debate at a debate site.
 
Back
Top Bottom