• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Have you ever been in a fight for your life?

Have you ever been in a true fight for your life?


  • Total voters
    11
In September 2003, Zimmerman called police and reported that another motorist spat on him, according to reports, Zimmerman followed the man in his car until the police arrived. Daniel Osmun, the other driver, told police that Zimmerman was tailgating and that he spit his gum out the window "out of frustration."

Osum said that Zimmerman then pulled alongside of him, and the two argued. In a police report of the incident, Osum said “at one point, he thought Mr. Zimmerman was going to attack him." No charges were filed against either man.

Trayvon Martin Case: George Zimmerman Was 'Jekyll And Hyde,' Former Co-Worker Says

Oh look, a huffpo piece. One in which much of the information in it has since been proven wrong. (for example the part that says that M attacked Z from behind) Do you have anything more reliable?
 
I doubt I would ever believe ANY disparaging statements coming from his or her ex - whether man or woman. In my entire life, I have never heard even 1 woman say her ex was a great guy.


I have heard a woman say her ex was a great guy. I have also heard a woman say her ex was not a great guy.

* dismantling your delusions one post at a time *
 
I have heard a woman say her ex was a great guy. I have also heard a woman say her ex was not a great guy.

* dismantling your delusions one post at a time *


An ex making disparaging statements about her ex is not proof of anything. However, even any inuendo that is negative towards GZ is then posted by anti-GZ people as a fact in dozens of repetitious messages. All the people and of different races speaking highly of GZ is, of course, totally discounted as irrelevant. But it is not irrelevant.
 
I have heard a woman say her ex was a great guy. I have also heard a woman say her ex was not a great guy.

* dismantling your delusions one post at a time *


And you claim it is per se inherently undeniable fact that both were absolutely telling the true about their ex because she said so is your point?
 
No it doesn't prove Trayvon doubled back. That is a very silly assumption.

You know people who are violent and get infights frequently or suffer road rage generally believe that everyone is as violent as they are............

it proves that at the very least, Trayvon did not go home. either he doubled back or he stopped and waited. you know people who are thugs and drug users generally believe that everyone is as thuggish as they are......
 
With the known timelines, we know TM was NOT headed home. All the thousands of messages that he was walking home from the store are known false. All the messages that he was trying to get away from GZ are known false.
 
With the known timelines, we know TM was NOT headed home. All the thousands of messages that he was walking home from the store are known false. All the messages that he was trying to get away from GZ are known false.

BREAKING NEWS: REALITY IS NOT REAL:lamo

Man, where do you come up with these fantasies?

TM goes from point-A to point-B, then goes form Point-B to point-A. How difficult is it for you to understand such simple logic?
 
BREAKING NEWS: REALITY IS NOT REAL:lamo

Man, where do you come up with these fantasies?

TM goes from point-A to point-B, then goes form Point-B to point-A. How difficult is it for you to understand such simple logic?

TM was less than 200 feet from home when he STOPPED and WAITED for GZ to find him. Why is it so difficult for you to understand such a simple fact?
 
I had two tweaked out utes try to mug me-I shot one-whether they could have really hurt me given how messed up they were (beyond the broken nose) was unknown at the time-I figured I probably could have wasted both of them without the gun and easily with the knife I have along with the pistol but after catching a fist in the nose I got the heaviest artillery out and deployed it

another time-another stoner pulled a switchblade on me. I had a 3 foot oak stick. Not a fair fight, 8 seconds later he had a broken collarbone a broken wrist, a busted jaw and I kicked his knife down the storm sewer and the hardest part of it was deciding if I should really give him a serious beating then. I decided against it
 
I had two tweaked out utes try to mug me-I shot one-whether they could have really hurt me given how messed up they were (beyond the broken nose) was unknown at the time-I figured I probably could have wasted both of them without the gun and easily with the knife I have along with the pistol but after catching a fist in the nose I got the heaviest artillery out and deployed it

another time-another stoner pulled a switchblade on me. I had a 3 foot oak stick. Not a fair fight, 8 seconds later he had a broken collarbone a broken wrist, a busted jaw and I kicked his knife down the storm sewer and the hardest part of it was deciding if I should really give him a serious beating then. I decided against it


According to anti-GZers, in your first account you committed the crime of attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon for shooting someone who was unarmed for slugging you in the face.

My most common mention of "disabling" men when appropriate was to break his collar bone.

There is NO evidence that TM was not attempting to mug/rob GZ after beating him unconscious or to death. It is clear that TM was not walking home and was pacing back and forth in the rain. Maybe he was waiting for the right victim to come along.
 
BREAKING NEWS: REALITY IS NOT REAL:lamo

Man, where do you come up with these fantasies?

TM goes from point-A to point-B, then goes form Point-B to point-A. How difficult is it for you to understand such simple logic?


^ :dohThat is false. How difficult is it for you to understand that by proven time lines if TM was just going to the condo he would have been in the condo?
 
^ :dohThat is false. How difficult is it for you to understand that by proven time lines if TM was just going to the condo he would have been in the condo?

If you are going to use proven, at least provide a link son. This is why i call your stuff "fantasy". You never back anything up. There is no "proven" timeline that indicates he would have been home.

Trayvon Martin - Imgur
 
If you are going to use proven, at least provide a link son. This is why i call your stuff "fantasy". You never back anything up. There is no "proven" timeline that indicates he would have been home.

Trayvon Martin - Imgur


lol, funny that you should squeal about someone never backing anything up. hypocrite much?
 
I have provided links when asked, one in the post you quoted. More than I can say for you guys:lol:

another lie. just because you are presumably too stupid to follow and read a link does not mean it has not been provided
 
No link again:lol:

link to what? you didn't ask for one. the timeline has been linked multiple times. not our fault you are presumably too stupid to follow and read them
 
If you are going to use proven, at least provide a link son. This is why i call your stuff "fantasy". You never back anything up. There is no "proven" timeline that indicates he would have been home.

Trayvon Martin - Imgur

Yes there is. The length of time he was on the phone and Zimmerman's phone call to the police - versus his being only a couple hundred feet from his father's condo. He could have crawled to the condo in that amount of time.
 
I don't go around looking for black boogiemen in my neighbourhood. So no, can't say I have.
 
I don't go around looking for black boogiemen in my neighbourhood. So no, can't say I have.

who said anything about the person being black? or is it your assertion that only blacks can be boogiemen?
 
who said anything about the person being black? or is it your assertion that only blacks can be boogiemen?

No, I'm specifically saying that George Zimmerman was looking for a black person. :shrug:
 
No, I'm specifically saying that George Zimmerman was looking for a black person. :shrug:

^ No he wasn't. But you do. Obviously.
 
Back
Top Bottom