• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Prosecutor openly engages in criminal activity against George Zimmerman

Excon said:
Sure it was.
And it is part and parcel of things that Prosecutors get away with all the time.

So there is no sense complaining about it. It is done. They get away with it.

Can't change it.

Drive on.


And while trying to prevent Sharon from trying to derail, is noble, she will just continue to do so because she can not see her actions as wrong.
So it is pretty much a fruitless endeavor.
The best thing to do is point out her attempt at derailing, and continue on topic.
Click to expand...


The defense could use the action of the prosecutor in many ways, including naming the prosecutor as a witness in the case, thereby disqualifying her. I think an assertion could be made that the truthfulness of prosecution witnesses could be challenged because professionals who did not say what the prosecution wanted were fired or demoted and the prosecutor repeatedly has openly demonstrated that illegal conduct on behalf of the prosecution is expects and protected by the prosecutor - including by her demonstrating she herself can openly violate law, thus IF for the prosecution witnesses are free to - and even expected to - commit perjury for the prosecution's case.

Jurors do tend to balk when the think the prosecution is being unfair or fixated on doing anything even illegal or illegitimate to get a defendant.
 
joko104 said:

Not going to agree to let you derail this thread and it appears your goal on this forum is to derail all these topics.

The actions of the prosecutor issuing a press release with George Zimmerman's academic records was illegal and a grotesque violation of a government official releasing statutorily protected confidential information. Angela Corey should be prosecuted, a civil suit should be filed against her and the county seeking a restraining order against her, removed from the case and sanctioned by the bar association.
Click to expand...

They are evidence of George's lies to SPD, his lawyer, Hannity...

Meanwhile.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.flcourts18.org/PDF/Press_...203 2012.pdf

"Your appearance on the following day(s) is MANDATORY and your failure to appear will rsult in forfeiture of bond."

October 03, 2012 8:30 Docket Sounding
 
I am reposting the OP due to Sharon's ongoing attempts to derail the topic of this thread.


Zimmerman Prosecutors In Huge Screw-Up | The Smoking Gun

She should be removed from the case, sanctioned by the bar association and prosecuted.
 
sharon said:
They are evidence of George's lies to SPD, his lawyer, Hannity...
Click to expand...
No they are not. If they were, you could provided evidence of said lies.

Since you do not. Then you are blowing smoke.




And secondly:
If you want to discuss these emails why are you not starting a thread, instead of cluttering up the other topics with your nonsense?
 
Excon said:
No they are not. If they were, you could provided evidence of said lies.

Since you do not. Then you are blowing smoke.




And secondly:
If you want to discuss these emails why are you not starting a thread, instead of cluttering up the other topics with your nonsense?
Click to expand...

Sure.. He said he was enrolled at UCF, had a degree in Criminal justice and was going to law school.
 
sharon said:
Sure.. He said he was enrolled at UCF, had a degree in Criminal justice and was going to law school.
Click to expand...
iLOL
Realy Sharon?
He said all those things, huh?

Please provide his exact words for us in quotes and sourced.

Prove you are not blowing smoke up our collective butts.
 
Excon said:
iLOL
Realy Sharon?
He said all those things, huh?

Please provide his exact words for us in quotes and sourced.

Prove you are not blowing smoke up our collective butts.
Click to expand...

I have repeatedly posted links to the SPD interviews.. and you know where to find the Hannity interview.

Come on.. George GPA was .5.. and he finally got it up to 1.38.. He spent 9 years in a two year program.

Lies and delusions... goes to character..

Lied to the Judge? Goes to character.

Would he lie about 2/26?
 
sharon said:
I have repeatedly posted links to the SPD interviews.. and you know where to find the Hannity interview.

Come on.. George GPA was .5.. and he finally got it up to 1.38.. He spent 9 years in a two year program.

Lies and delusions... goes to character..

Lied to the Judge? Goes to character.

Would he lie about 2/26?
Click to expand...
Blowing smoke then. Good to know.


You seem confused as how to prove something.
None of the above proves anything of import or what was being discussed.
It is just more meaningless irrelevancy and distraction from you.

Let me show you how you prove something.


If you hold something out to be true, you provide it.
Link to it and quote it, or point out the mark it is said when using audio or video.
Like the following:

Excon said:
sharon said:
Excon said:
sharon said:
This is 13 year old Austin. He'll do well on the stand.
Trayvon's Murder: 13-Year-Old Witness, Austin - YouTube
Click to expand...
There you go trying to be a bully and spamming this section with irrelevancy again.

Yes he should do fine.
Yes he puts Zimmerman on the ground yelling for help.




Unless of course he is influenced by his moms falsities.

Like her claiming he was forced to say the color of the guys shirt was red when that clearly is not the case.
Click to expand...

Poor police work.. They were leading all the witnesses.
Click to expand...
No they were not.
Here is the interview. Listen to it.
Start at the 1 min mark.
http://trayvon.axiomamnesia.com/wp-...in-George-Zimmerman-Audio-W14_SPD03052012.mp3
Click to expand...



Did you see that Sharon?
That is how you use evidence in replies.
Learn from it!


But what you do not do, is say you have provided such when you have not.
Nor do you say here is the link, find it yourself, and then later say you have provided proof when you did not.
That much is common sense.



So I repeat the following in hopes that you finally know how to prove something instead of blowing smoke.


Realy Sharon?
He said all those things, huh?

Please provide his exact words for us in quotes and sourced.

Prove you are not blowing smoke up our collective butts.​
 
Last edited:
sharon said:
I have repeatedly posted links to the SPD interviews.. and you know where to find the Hannity interview.

Come on.. George GPA was .5.. and he finally got it up to 1.38.. He spent 9 years in a two year program.

Lies and delusions... goes to character..

Lied to the Judge? Goes to character.

Would he lie about 2/26?
Click to expand...



The stupidity of Trayvon "Rambo" Martin is hard to count.
SO stupid as to be suspended from school at least 3 times.
SO ignorant as to vandalize school property under a video camera.
TM is dead because of how incredible ignorant he was, a complete dumbass.

The HOA should have had a rule against allowing guests who are as stupid as TM.

TM's father should be liable for all legal expenses of everyone for allowing his known juvenile deliquent teenage son while on his third suspension from school including for vandalism to be out wandering the street like the criminal that he was and was known to be. Vandalizing school property is criminal. So why the surprise that he acted like a criminal when out wandering about. Given the jewelry he had stolen, it is very possible his attack on GZ was a failed attempted mugging.
 
Last edited:
Excon said:
Blowing smoke then. Good to know.


You seem confused as how to prove something.
None of the above proves anything of import or what was being discussed.
It is just more meaningless irrelevancy and distraction from you.

Let me show you how you prove something.


If you hold something out to be true, you provide it.
Link to it and quote it, or point out the mark it is said when using audio or video.
Like the following:

​


But what you do not do, is say you have provided such when you have not.
Nor do you say here is the link, find it yourself, and then later say you have provided proof when you did not.
That much is common sense.



So I repeat the following in hopes that you finally know how to prove something instead of blowing smoke.


Realy Sharon?
He said all those things, huh?

Please provide his exact words for us in quotes and sourced.

Prove you are not blowing smoke up our collective butts.​
Click to expand...


Deliberately and repeatedly to the level of spamming false claims is common.
Still wanting for proof GZ said he was hit 25 times. Isn't coming because it never happened.
 
Any criminal activities you think the prosecutor can't or won't commit? Drafting and having officers swear a false affidavit. Issuing a press release to release materials it was illegal for her to release.
 
There has been no sanctions, action or even investigation into the crime Corey committed against GZ.
 
She mailed out press release packages containing legally protected and privileged school records of George Zimmerman. It is a criminal offense for a government official to release confidential records. She did not just release them, she issued them as mailed out press releases to insure the confidential and legally protected information would be published locally and nationwide.

That law does not make an exception for white prosecutors issuing press releases of private protected information against Latinos. Or maybe you can link to that exclusion?
 
Joko.
You may, or may not be, right.

But even if you are, Corey will not be held responsible. That is not the way the system works.
It might be nice if it did, then everything could be on the up-n-up, but it is not.

So complaining about it here will not achieve anything.
 
Excon said:
Joko.
You may, or may not be, right.

But even if you are, Corey will not be held responsible. That is not the way the system works.
It might be nice if it did, then everything could be on the up-n-up, but it is not.

So complaining about it here will not achieve anything.
Click to expand...

Nothing we do here is going to achieve anything.

My problem with all about the case isn't really about GZ or the incident. It is about a bunch of partisan politicians - Democrat and African-American - along with their talking heads in the media - doing everything in their power including open dishonesty and corruption - against the judicial system for which then these extraordinary and all but unheard of actions by politicians - particularly after Obama declared what mattered was TM's race being the same as his own.

What I don't agree is that the anti-GZers will continued to define was is relevant to "debate" including usually totally irrelevant or pointless junk claims.

A shorter way to put it is that I am far more interested in the legal and judical process being done than the incident. There are countless assaults, shootings and violent deaths that happen. This is not a special incident in that regards. What makes it so significant is the politics and diversions from normal police work and criminal justice.

As for the case, the defense should put spotlight all the bizarre, unique and crappy aspects of the case and those of the prosecutor's office too - such as her OOPS sending PRESS RELEASE PACKAGES with GZ's confidential school records. No one mails press release packages not knowing they are doing so. NOR are press release packages part of prosecution. So it shows the prosecutor's office doing ANYTHING to trash GZ - even illegally so.

That fits into officers saying they were pressured to lie for the prosecution, witnesses reversing or changing their story after secret communications from the prosecutor's office, and the prosecutor bypassing the grand jury.

The defense should point to all such unlimited-even-by-law attempts to destroy GZ - and to do so for political and personal agendas.This calls all witnesses of the prosecution into question and would make the jury listen more carefully to the difference between evidence and what the prosecutor says - which isn't evidence at all but the prosecutor can say nearly anything whether or not in evidence.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom