• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Zimmerman Recusal Request Ruled "legally insufficient". [W:42]

Its really sad that anyone would be in favor of this judge staying. They should WANT Zimmerman to have a fair trial, apparently some definitely do not want that.
 
The prosecutor and judge eliminating GZ's money for investigators and defense, while unlimited funds and staffing for the prosecution, is one primary strategy of the judge and prosecutor towards conviction. The judge even admitted that money had nothing to do with whether or not GZ would appear for trial, only the GPS unit (he fined GZ for having to pay for also without GZ found guilty of anything) does.

Why put words in the judge's mouth?

(Because without false claims it is infinitely harder to maintain a moon landing quality conspiracy theory)
 
Its really sad that anyone would be in favor of this judge staying. They should WANT Zimmerman to have a fair trial, apparently some definitely do not want that.

it is really sad some are in favor of GZ getting a new judge simply because he doesn't want to accept responsibility for his own actions. It's obvious they don't want him to have a fair trial.

(I don't care what judge he has and if I thought it would make any difference I too would be vocal about getting a new judge. it wouldn't matter. GZ supporters would find a new angle to complain about.)
 
I agree that O'Mara will want to be gone but court's just don't let attorneys quit in the middle of a case unless they have urgent circumstances. O'Mara is stuck now to the end whether he likes it or not. On the bright side for O'Mara, even if he loses, he'll still probably get a book deal out of it. :)

GZ is a loose cannon and all Omara would have to do is file a motion for non compliance and he could cite the money issue as empirical evidence. Courts are sympathetic to lawyers when their clients refuse their legal advice.

I'm not seeing much of a book deal but only because this has been so transparent. He may get one or in the very least publish work for the legal field on a high profile case with a nutbag for a client.
 
it is really sad some are in favor of GZ getting a new judge simply because he doesn't want to accept responsibility for his own actions. It's obvious they don't want him to have a fair trial.

(I don't care what judge he has and if I thought it would make any difference I too would be vocal about getting a new judge. it wouldn't matter. GZ supporters would find a new angle to complain about.)
Check yourself.
Do not attribute it to the whole, that which one person has said.

Then after you have done that, you really need to understands that the underlined portion is in contention.

If he can show that he was of the understanding that the funds did not need to be reported, he did not commit a crime in that regard.

Your simply declaring that he is guilty and lied is not sufficient to judge him so.
 
Last edited:
Check yourself.
If your issue is with joko, do not attribute it to the whole.

Then after you have done that, you really need to understands that the underlined portion is in contention.

If he can show that he was under the understanding that the funds did not need to be reported, he did not commit a crime in that regard.

Your simply declaring that he is guilty and lied is not sufficient to judge him so.

This again? Are you serious? Omara admitted GZ knew the money was supposed to be reported and one of the excuses he offered is GZ didn't trust the system.

It is God warped boggling anyone is still trying to claim GZ didn't lie about the money.
 
This again? Are you serious? Omara admitted GZ knew the money was supposed to be reported and one of the excuses he offered is GZ didn't trust the system.

It is God warped boggling anyone is still trying to claim GZ didn't lie about the money.
Yes this again, because what you are saying is not true.
And most likely what you are saying is only your interpretation of what O'Mara may supposedly have said.

But we will never know because you have never supplied evidence of such, even though having repeatedly been asked.
 
Yes this again, because what you are saying is not true.
And most likely what you are saying is only your interpretation of what O'Mara may supposedly have said.

But we will never know because you have never supplied evidence of such, even though having repeatedly been asked.

We all know your position is you will never admit GZ lied about the money even if GZ went to your front door, looked you in the eye and admitted it.

Even Omara was never dumb enough to argue they didn't know the money was supposed to be reported.
 
Yes this again, because what you are saying is not true.
And most likely what you are saying is only your interpretation of what O'Mara may supposedly have said.

But we will never know because you have never supplied evidence of such, even though having repeatedly been asked.

Wrong. We do know. We have a court order that says he lied.
 
We all know your position is you will never admit GZ lied about the money even if GZ went to your front door, looked you in the eye and admitted it.

Even Omara was never dumb enough to argue they didn't know the money was supposed to be reported.
Deflecting instead of proving what you say. Figures!


Wrong. We do know. We have a court order that says he lied.
iLOL
No you don't. Period!
 
Wrong. We do know. We have a court order that says he lied.


No you don't. Basically nothing you post is accurate or even seems to attempt to be accurate.
 
No you don't. Basically nothing you post is accurate or even seems to attempt to be accurate.

The lies are not disputed..

Th court has the banking transactions, the branch manager, the jailhouse calls and the transcript of the bond hearing.
 
The lies are not disputed..
You clearly do not know what you are talking about.
Nothing has been proven one way or another.
 
You clearly do not know what you are talking about.
Nothing has been proven one way or another.

LOLOL

You think someone else made the jail house calls or did all those bank transactions?
 
LOLOL

You think someone else made the jail house calls or did all those bank transactions?

You have to realize it is a waste of time. Even Omara admits GZ lied and they still try to deny he lied.
 
You have to realize it is a waste of time. Even Omara admits GZ lied and they still try to deny he lied.

Gosh, yeah... what was that OMara said.. He said they were naive, confused and didn't trust the system.
 
You clearly do not know what you are talking about.
Nothing has been proven one way or another.

It's funny to watch people keep trying to win a fight they've already lost.
 
No he's not.

That's what I heard from numerous sources, and it was stated by the prosecution when Zimmerman was in court for lying.
 
That's what I heard from numerous sources, and it was stated by the prosecution when Zimmerman was in court for lying.

You are right.. George has to take the stand.. What a disaster that will be.

This is the best interactive map of the Retreat.. Run your cursor over the blue bubbles.

Graphics | MiamiHerald.com
 
That's what I heard from numerous sources, and it was stated by the prosecution when Zimmerman was in court for lying.

You are right.. George has to take the stand.. What a disaster that will be.

This is the best interactive map of the Retreat.. Run your cursor over the blue bubbles.

Graphics | MiamiHerald.com

There is no legal mandate ordering a defendant to take the stand at trial when claiming self defense. As a practical matter, if he doesn't take the stand he has absolutely no chance of an acquittal.
 
Back
Top Bottom