• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Fact: Serino Did Not Tell FBI......

Wrong!
Or purposely ignoring information.

At 4 p.m. March 12, Sanford police Chief Bill Lee Jr. stood in City Hall plaza in front of a hostile crowd and dozens of reporters and insisted his agency could not arrest Zimmerman because investigators had failed to establish probable cause, the minimal standard of evidence to justify filing a criminal case.


And as already pointed out we know why it was filed and we know what Serino said three days later.

Is there some reason you refuse to read it after asking for it?

http://www.talkleft.com/zimm/capias1.pdf
 
Is there some reason you refuse to read it after asking for it?
Is there some reason you are lying about who requested what?


And as I already pointed out. We know why it was filed. It w=as procedural so the Prosecutor could take over the investigation.
 
Is there some reason you are lying about who requested what?


And as I already pointed out. We know why it was filed. It w=as procedural so the Prosecutor could take over the investigation.

Serino is probably a good cop.. who is experienced and has good instincts for liars and cons like George.. He said Barnes who is black was concerned about the black community.. and rightly so. The black families in Sanford had the right to expect a thorough investigtion . anything less makes racial matters worse.. and I while I am white and pretty conservative, I don't want someone like George to walk away after killing an unarmed teen.. and I don't care what color any of them are.
 
Is there some reason you are lying about who requested what?


And as I already pointed out. We know why it was filed. It w=as procedural so the Prosecutor could take over the investigation.

Do you know what a request for Capias is and have you read the document?
 
Serino is probably a good cop.. who is experienced and has good instincts for liars and cons like George.. He said Barnes who is black was concerned about the black community.. and rightly so. The black families in Sanford had the right to expect a thorough investigtion . anything less makes racial matters worse.. and I while I am white and pretty conservative, I don't want someone like George to walk away after killing an unarmed teen.. and I don't care what color any of them are.
Do you know what a request for Capias is and have you read the document?
Typical.

Non-responsive to that which was asked.
 
Serino said he was pressured to sign it and that proof has been presented on this forum many times.

Try to keep up with the topic.

Where is the link with him saying that?
 
Which was a procedural filing so the Prosecutor could take over the investigation.

"As I have stated consistently, at the time and based on the evidence and testimony we had, we did not have probable cause to make a physical arrest."

His agency recommended the manslaughter charge on paper, the statement said, because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.


And as we all know the Prosecutor said there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman and was taking it to a Grand Jury.

And as for what Serino's actual position was...

Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."

Prosecutors do not need a capias request to investigate a case so I don't know why you obsessively repeat blatantly false info from an unknown source. It's probably because you like what it says so it doesn't matter it is completely false.
 
Prosecutors do not need a capias request to investigate a case so I don't know why you obsessively repeat blatantly false info from an unknown source. It's probably because you like what it says so it doesn't matter it is completely false.
There you go with your lies again. Even ignoring the sequence of what was known. So typical.
You know who the reported source is.
You realize your focusing on such is just an act of desperation right?
Because I am sure the rest can see it also.

And as for "completely false", that would obviously be you projecting again.

And you might want to prove your assertion that the prosecutor can just take over an investigation without a capias.
lol
:doh
Good luck with that!
 
Last edited:
There you go with your lies again. Even ignoring the sequence of what was known. So typical.
You know who the reported source is.
You realize your focusing on such is just an act of desperation right?
Because I am sure the rest can see it also.

And as for "completely false", that would obviously be you projecting again.

And you might want to prove your assertion that the prosecutor can just take over an investigation without a capias.
lol
:doh
Good luck with that!

Show us the capias sent to Corey's office.
 
WTF?
It was already in the Prosecutor's hands.

Show us the capias sent to Corey's office.

Show us the law that says a capias is required for a prosecutor to investigate.

show us exactly who said it was strictly "procedural"

We ALL know you can't do any of those which is why your posts get laughed at.
 
Show us the capias sent to Corey's office. lol I have no need to do so because it was already in the Prosecutor's hands. But you know that.

Show us the law that says a capias is required for a prosecutor to investigate. I supported my claim by provided the news report.
The onus is on you to support your claim that it is not, not me.


show us exactly who said it was strictly "procedural" Look up the definition.
When it was said; "because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.", that is a clear indication it was procedural.
Or did you not know that?

We ALL know you can't do any of those which is why your posts get laughed at.
Sadly more projection on your part.


"As I have stated consistently, at the time and based on the evidence and testimony we had, we did not have probable cause to make a physical arrest."

His agency recommended the manslaughter charge on paper, the statement said, because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.


And as we all know the Prosecutor said there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman and was taking it to a Grand Jury.

And as for what Serino's actual position was...

Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."
 
Last edited:
Sadly more projection on your part.


"As I have stated consistently, at the time and based on the evidence and testimony we had, we did not have probable cause to make a physical arrest."

His agency recommended the manslaughter charge on paper, the statement said, because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.


And as we all know the Prosecutor said there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman and was taking it to a Grand Jury.

And as for what Serino's actual position was...

Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."

Really? I provided the Capias Request signed by Serino on March 13th in a PDF FILE AND YOU REFUSED TO READ IT. The request said Manslaughter/negilgent homicide.
 
Really? I provided the Capias Request signed by Serino on March 13th in a PDF FILE AND YOU REFUSED TO READ IT. The request said Manslaughter/negilgent homicide.
Non-responsive to what was being discussed.
Makes an untrue statement about not reading it. A lie! And has no bearing on what is being discussed.


Since you didn't get it the first time, I will provide the information again so that maybe you will better understand it this time.

And pay attention this time, because the first thing I quote is from the article you provided. I will put it in blue for you.


"As I have stated consistently, at the time and based on the evidence and testimony we had, we did not have probable cause to make a physical arrest."

His agency recommended the manslaughter charge on paper, the statement said, because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.


And as we all know the Prosecutor said there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman and was taking it to a Grand Jury.

And as for what Serino's actual position was...


Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."
 
Non-responsive to what was being discussed.
Makes an untrue statement about not reading it. A lie! And has no bearing on what is being discussed.


Since you didn't get it the first time, I will provide the information again so that maybe you will better understand it this time.

And pay attention this time, because the first thing I quote is from the article you provided. I will put it in blue for you.


"As I have stated consistently, at the time and based on the evidence and testimony we had, we did not have probable cause to make a physical arrest."

His agency recommended the manslaughter charge on paper, the statement said, because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.


And as we all know the Prosecutor said there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman and was taking it to a Grand Jury.

And as for what Serino's actual position was...


Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."

You have never stated the source of that false claim and repeatedly post it to show GZ supporters don't care about facts.
 
You have never stated the source of that false claim and repeatedly post it to show GZ supporters don't care about facts.

There you go again with the bs.

Prove the News Article provided a false claim.
We all know you can't, but go ahead and try! LOL



Since you didn't get it the first time, I will provide the information again so that maybe you will better understand it this time.

And pay attention this time, because the first thing I quote is from the article you provided. I will put it in blue for you.


"As I have stated consistently, at the time and based on the evidence and testimony we had, we did not have probable cause to make a physical arrest."

His agency recommended the manslaughter charge on paper, the statement said, because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.


And as we all know the Prosecutor said there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman and was taking it to a Grand Jury.

And as for what Serino's actual position was...


Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."
 
There you go again with the bs.

Prove the News Article provided a false claim.
We all know you can't, but go ahead and try! LOL



Since you didn't get it the first time, I will provide the information again so that maybe you will better understand it this time.

And pay attention this time, because the first thing I quote is from the article you provided. I will put it in blue for you.


"As I have stated consistently, at the time and based on the evidence and testimony we had, we did not have probable cause to make a physical arrest."

His agency recommended the manslaughter charge on paper, the statement said, because without it, prosecutors would not have taken over the investigation.


And as we all know the Prosecutor said there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman and was taking it to a Grand Jury.

And as for what Serino's actual position was...


Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.

"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."

The news article cited an anonymous source so we have no idea who made the false claim. We do know for a fact a capias is only filed when a LEO signs a statement under oath there is probable cause. It is the procedure Serino had to follow to REQUEST CHARGES be filed against GZ. It isn't standard procedure for every investigation because they are not all concluded with PC against a suspect.
 
The news article cited an anonymous source so we have no idea who made the false claim. We do know for a fact a capias is only filed when a LEO signs a statement under oath there is probable cause. It is the procedure Serino had to follow to REQUEST CHARGES be filed against GZ. It isn't standard procedure for every investigation because they are not all concluded with PC against a suspect.
Wrong!

The source sighted was Lee's PR agency. Sorry you do not like that.

Nor have you shown it is a false claim. Nor could you.

It came form the guy who was in charge at the time, Chief Lee, there is no reason to question it.
It was filed for procedural reasons so the prosecutor could take over the investigation. Nothing more.

All the information surrounding this filing that has come before and after it, suggests that is the very reason it was filed.


The fact is, that you repeatedly ignore that which you do not like in favor of your preconceive and biased narrative.
 
Back
Top Bottom