Furiounova
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 4,237
- Reaction score
- 552
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Don't apologize. The MOST rabid dog on these topics is the noob Furionova who joined this month. In raging at you, Furionova declares she doesn't want George Zimmerman "sent to jail without due process."
http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...n-case-said-he-pressured-file-charges-19.html
Wanting GZ "locked up" for no offense at all. Over and over. But declaring exact opposite to you - knowing it completely false. Even calling you "desperate" and then Furionova lying about her own messages we all read to personally attack you.
That is all Furionova does. Find ANYTHING to make personal attacks not only at Zimmerman but us regulars with absolutely no integrity whatsoever. Furionova appears to have come to this forum just to make incessant personal attacks and ragings at anyone she can find to do so, not just GZ.
Furionova has continually posted the GZ should have never been allowed bond, that he should be in jail, and even if not guilty should be in jail as insane or a suicide threat.
Furionova has never, once, called for ANY due process for Zimmerman. Just incessant, raging hatred and accusations, often clearly and deliberately false or just rank hate-name-calling.
Over 100 times, that newbie has posted that GZ is "a proven liar" and that "his own damn lawyer admitted that he lied" (absolutely false.) But truth is an irrelevancy to that noob.
You do just float in and out of this topic. But those regularly in it all know this about Furionova. Even those opposed to Zimmerman avoid connect to Furionova for that reason. So don't appologize. You got it 100% right about her. Others may oppose Zimmerman citing reasons that they think are legitimate, but Furionova just rages false statements incessantly over and over and over. An old gossip monger.
The exception is Sharon and they may be connected or one in the same. Both openly hope for GZ to commit suicide and have many similarities that are somewhat unique to just those two.
If I openly hoped for him to commit suicide why would I say it would be best for him to be in jail so he can't commit suicide?
Your false accusation is quite funny considering you completely ignore the context. In my response to Maggie I was clearly talking about him not being sent to jail as in convicted without a trial.
The quote you linked is me talking about why he should have been denied a second bond. Mainly, to ensure as much as possible due process will not be cut short.
You complain about people making false claims while you peddle the crazy conspiracy theory the judge and prosecutor are having secret meetings.