• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

George Zimmerman will plead guilty to Manslaughter

I can't misrepresent actual quotes.

I have quoted people saying that it was dark.
Yes you can and are.
If they are not speaking to this argument you are misrepresenting what they say.
 
Last edited:
ahh yes.. the old " i'm gonna play dumb" act..... too bad your avatar ****s it up for you.

My avatar is about a wager..

Trayvon is pictured in family vacation photos taken 9 days before he was shot.

He was a skinny zipper of a kid.... having grown 6 inches in two years.. He also had sprouted two whiskers.

I am a white mother and grandmother.. of tall sons (and brothers) who were still growing at 21. So. .. I have a good fix on these tall, skinny kids with 29 inche waists.

So ... GET my position.. I don't want people like George Zimmerman carrying a gun and making decisions about which teen is a threat and which teen is not.
 
Excon refuses to admit that it was dark. He is arguing time & time again, that it was not dark.

From what I gather, he is arguing that it was not pitch black as Sheik indicated. It apparently was not pitch black, as witnesses were able to see some details including colors that were being worn.
 
Wrong!

So what!


And there you have it folks. Her beliefs, as based on how she views things. Her biases at work.
That is all she has.

Medical evidence just supports a mother's experience with dozens a head wounds over the past 50 years.
 
Excon refuses to admit that it was dark. He is arguing time & time again, that it was not dark.
And you have been told over and over and over and over and over again and again that you have the argument wrong.
That my argument was one of being more specific, that it was Dusk.
What do you not understand about that?
Stop misrepresenting what my argument actually is, and ****en listen, because I have already told you numerous times what it was and you still refuse to get it right, but choose instead to make baseless accusations.

It was Dusk.
What do you not understand about that?
 
From what I gather, he is arguing that it was not pitch black as Sheik indicated. It apparently was not pitch black, as witnesses were able to see some details including colors that were being worn.

pitch black? surely not.

dark? many of the witnesses say it was dark, and many of the Zimmerman-supporters here say it was dark.

its fair to say that it was dark, and I don't understand why Excon is fighting this like the whole case rests on this one minor detail.
 
Medical evidence just supports a mother's experience with dozens a head wounds over the past 50 years.
Mother's experience?
Mother's experience?
Holy ****!
You want to convict a guy based on your mother's experience. :doh
 
pitch black? surely not.

dark? many of the witnesses say it was dark, and many of the Zimmerman-supporters here say it was dark.

its fair to say that it was dark, and I don't understand why Excon is fighting this like the whole case rests on this one minor detail.

And you have been told over and over again that that is not my argument. So you are misrepresenting my position.
That make you a liar.

My position is that it was Dusk.
Prove that wrong.
 
My avatar is about a wager..

Trayvon is pictured in family vacation photos taken 9 days before he was shot.

He was a skinny zipper of a kid.... having grown 6 inches in two years.. He also had sprouted two whiskers.

I am a white mother and grandmother.. of tall sons (and brothers) who were still growing at 21. So. .. I have a good fix on these tall, skinny kids with 29 inche waists.

So ... GET my position.. I don't want people like George Zimmerman carrying a gun and making decisions about which teen is a threat and which teen is not.

I don't care why you lie or play dumb... I just want you to stop.

as an adult, a mother, and a grandmother, you should know that honesty is a very good policy... a policy that you repeatedly and willfully break.


nobody cares what you want ... your wants or desires are irrelevant to everyone but you.
I do get your position... I think it's stupid and wrongheaded, but I get it.... you are free to hold that position, but you are not going to get away with lying and playing stupid just to be able to maintain it..... not gonna happen.
 
Mother's experience?
Mother's experience?
Holy ****!
You want to convict a guy based on your mother's experience. :doh

You saw those tiny cat scratches and the medical personnel confirm it.
 
you have lost this one.
Only a fool, or a person foolishly trying to bait would say such.
Which one are you?


your position is contradicted by your many allies, who say it was dark.
lol
:doh
Beside you misrepresenting what they say, being a lie.
Saying it is dark outside does not in any way contradict my position that it was Dusk (which it was).

I have asked you to prove my position that it was Dusk wrong. You refuse to do so, or at least refuse to admit that you can't, because it can't be done.
Why is that?
Because it was Dusk.
 
he said it was dusk, not dark.
Bingo!

Because it was I pointing out how weak Yerbuti's position was.

As a more accurate description, it was Dusk, not dark.


Let me show you just how weak your position is.

Zimmerman was following Trayvon in the dark ... fact
Not fact.
7:15 pm ish, Dusk, not dark.
Now you're flat out lying. Sunset was at 6:21pm. By 7:15, it was pitch black.


And when it later became obvious that Yerbuti did not understand what was being argued in reference to Dusk. I pointed it out to him.

So we had three arguments at this point.
It not being what Yerbuti thought was Dusk.
It actually being Dusk, not wrong, or a lie.
And it not being "pitch black".


And now you are trying to argue an argument that you had no idea about, and even after being told about it, you continued with your false assertions.
That is called being pathetic.
That is called being dishonest.
And when you purposely misrepresent a position, that is called lying.

You should have refused to join in the concerted effort, because you all came away looking like clowns.
 
Bingo!

Because it was I pointing out how weak Yerbuti's position was.

As a more accurate description, it was Dusk, not dark....

so why do so many of your allies say it was dark?

why do eye-witnesses say it was dark?

and most importantly, why do you care so much about this minor detail? will this make or break your case?
 
so why do so many of your allies say it was dark?

why do eye-witnesses say it was dark?

and most importantly, why do you care so much about this minor detail? will this make or break your case?

You are truly being pathetic Einstein.
My argument was that the more accurate description is that it was Dusk.
Which has nothing to do with the lies you are asserting.
You keep ignoring that, and you are the one that keeps bringing it up. I am only replying.
 
Back
Top Bottom