• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

George Zimmerman will plead guilty to Manslaughter

A disgruntled ex speaks out.
:doh
Big ****en deal.
It matters not and therefore can be dismissed.

The prosecution has to have reason to introduce said information.
If it does get admitted, it then will be rebutted with Zimmerman's multiply acts of kindness towards persons of color.

So it is meaningless.




As a side note.
Obviously a mistake, but ...

And that is also a ****ty source to use, because apparently the author isn't very educated.


The witness, identified as "Witness 9," is also Zimmerman’s old girlfriend and in prosecution documents she contests that Zimmerman doesn’t like black people.



She is contesting it?
lol
:doh
 
Last edited:
Pants could have been a card-carrying KKK member and the shooting could still have been justified.


Pants wasn't on duty. He was just going to the store and a regular guy. The rules of the watch don't apply.

GZ's doctor says no head trauma:

Medical records: George Zimmerman had black eyes, painful broken nose but no head trauma - Trayvon Martin - MiamiHerald.com

the claim about the EMTs was from Sharon, so I'll just go by the doctor's report instead

Then explain the blood and bandages on the back of his head. Explain the security video clearly showing the injury.
 
Pants could have been a card-carrying KKK member and the shooting could still have been justified....

GZ being a racist will add to the Prosecutor's claim that he killed in anger, not merely in self-defense. As his injuries also show.

...Pants wasn't on duty. He was just going to the store and a regular guy. The rules of the watch don't apply....

he wasn't on duty? says whom? MANY of the folks on your side have claimed that he WAS on duty, including you...before you did a quick 180 when you realized he broke various NW rules & regs.

...Then explain the blood and bandages on the back of his head. Explain the security video clearly showing the injury.

tell it do GZ's own damn doctor. He's the one who made the call, not me.
 
Last edited:

Yes dear, I said that then. "03-26-12, 06:45 PM". What is today's date?
As soon as I found out he was on his way to the store I stopped making that claim.
Are you so uneducated as to not understand that?

Because as you know, I do not claim that now do I?

Talk about grasping to an extreme.
 
Last edited:
Yes dear, I said that then. "03-26-12, 06:45 PM". What is today's date?
As soon as I found out he was on his way to the store I stopped making that claim.
Are you so uneducated as to not understand that?

well, this is the first time you are stating this.

thanks for clarrifying your remarks, and explaining your inconsistency.
 
well, this is the first time you are stating this.

thanks for clarrifying your remarks, and explaining your inconsistency.
Not really. As soon as I started saying he was on his way to the store is when I first changed my position on that.

If you had common sense you would know that.
 

one more time for your enjoyment. police statement
"Mr. Zimmerman was not acting outside the legal boundaries of Florida Statute by
carrying his weapon when this incident occurred. He was in fact on a personal
errand in his vehicle when he observed Mr. Martin in the community and called the
Sanford Police Department.
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Zimmerman_Martin_shooting.pdf

Fact. GZ was not on duty
Fact. GZ was within the law in carrying the weapon.
 
Last edited:
one more time for your enjoyment. police statement
"Mr. Zimmerman was not acting outside the legal boundaries of Florida Statute by
carrying his weapon when this incident occurred. He was in fact on a personal
errand in his vehicle when he observed Mr. Martin in the community and called the
Sanford Police Department.
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Zimmerman_Martin_shooting.pdf

Fact. GZ was not on duty
Fact. GZ was within the law in carrying the weapon.

so EVERYONE who claims he was acting as a NW and was on duty, is wrong.

good. I'm gonna laugh my ass off when GZ brings up his NW status as part of his defense at the trial.
 
one more time for your enjoyment. police statement
"Mr. Zimmerman was not acting outside the legal boundaries of Florida Statute by
carrying his weapon when this incident occurred. He was in fact on a personal
errand in his vehicle when he observed Mr. Martin in the community and called the
Sanford Police Department.
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Zimmerman_Martin_shooting.pdf

Fact. GZ was not on duty
Fact. GZ was within the law in carrying the weapon.
Yeah, his argument are ridiculous.

He doesn't understand that someone has taken a different position when they have posted such.

It is like he doesn't understand how a position evolves based on what is known. :doh
 
Last edited:
so EVERYONE who claims he was acting as a NW and was on duty, is wrong.

good. I'm gonna laugh my ass off when GZ brings up his NW status as part of his defense at the trial.

Then why do you keep bringing up he violated the rules. Seems many on this thread need to look some things up before posting false statements.
 
so EVERYONE who claims he was acting as a NW and was on duty, is wrong.

good.


Thats correct

I'm gonna laugh my ass off when GZ brings up his NW status as part of his defense at the trial.

Where's the logic behind this?
 
He may well plead guilty but not the reasons the OP says...

1. The judge and prosecutor have already conspired to expose his wife to kidnapping, assault and murder.
2. The judge had become a prosecutor and is prosecuting his wife for a crime that she didn't commit.
3. Zimmerman has been put into solitary confinement, which is torturous by its nature.
4. The prosecutor openly promotes, uses and allows perjury against Zimmerman.
5. The president of the United States claimed that it was his surrogate son what was killed.
6. The national media - print and television - has repeatedly declared it fact that Zimmerman committed cold blooded murder.
7. The federal government and state government has devoted dozens of investigators, officers and hired experts to prosecute - while Zimmerman has little to nothing -
8. and now the judge and prosecutor are working to take away the little money contributed to him for defense, meaning
9. George Zimmerman has no real defense team.
10. The lack of due process or even much pretending the court process is legitimate, so much so the newbie judge won't even make rulings until privately consulting others to instruct him how to rule.
11. National Democrat and Florida Republican politicians have person political interests in Zimmerman being convicted and everyone from the judge to prosecutor are politicians or appointed by politicians so their jobs are at stake.
12. In comparison, Zimmerman is an nobody with no one and nothing. Little guys can't win against the full force and fury of the government, media and partisan politics.


I could see GZ pleading guilty to protect his wife including saving her from what appears a conscious effort by the judge and prosecutor to either cause her to be assaulted or murdered or imprisoned - where she could be assaulted or murdered instead there.

When the President himself declared this is a political race war case Zimmerman should have made a run for it before any warrant was issued - meaning then running would not have broken any laws.

People should get really scared when their justice system gets politicized.
 
I'm new here but shouldn't the title have been better named to show his pleading isn't yet a fact? I seems sort of misleading.
 
I'm new here but shouldn't the title have been better named to show his pleading isn't yet a fact? I seems sort of misleading.

Its a bogus, dishonest and misleading thread title
 
This will achieve what purpose?

George was a one man band... He claimed that he didn't know Trayvon and that he looked like he "didn't belong there"..

George will also be asked if he knows all 500 residents and their guest and visitors.. George is an embicile.
 
Its a bogus, dishonest and misleading thread title

I thought it was just a vanity piece.. You will note that there is no link.

GZ probably will take a plea. His lies have wrecked any credibility he enjoyed.

At least when OMara blamed Trayvon for his own death I knew that OMara knew..
 
Back
Top Bottom