• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Zimmerman passed lie detector test day after Travon Martin shooting

Thunder said:
if the website that the donations were made to says the money will only be used for legal fees, then fraud has been committed.
Click to expand...
It specifies that since GZ can't work atm, the money will cover living expenses.

It's been broached that the donations were clearly not intended to be used for bond. And as such, SZ's testimony does not amount to perjury. Imho, that's ludicrous on its face. It seems silly as all get-out to say that the donors are being defrauded by spending some of the money on GZ's bond.
imho, anyway. Others' mmv.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
It specifies that since GZ can't work atm, the money will cover living expenses.

It's been broached that the donations were clearly not intended to be used for bond. And as such, SZ's testimony does not amount to perjury. Imho, that's ludicrous on its face. It seems silly as all get-out to say that the donors are being defrauded by spending some of the money on GZ's bond.
imho, anyway. Others' mmv.
Click to expand...
Simon
This isn't rocket science, or something based on consensus.

The funds were collected for the following reasons.
"any funds provided are used only for living expenses and legal defense, in lieu of my forced inability to maintain employment."​



Now you can try to split hairs all you like, but "legal defense" does not encompass "bond".
Because it isn't "legal defense", nor needed for defense.
 
Excon said:
Now you can try to split hairs all you like, but "legal defense" does not encompass "bond".
Because it isn't "legal defense", nor needed for defense.
Click to expand...
So you say.
 
I wonder how many people piss and moan about this, yet gleefully watch lie detector tests on Jerry, Maury, Steve, etc.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
It specifies that since GZ can't work atm, the money will cover living expenses.

It's been broached that the donations were clearly not intended to be used for bond. And as such, SZ's testimony does not amount to perjury. Imho, that's ludicrous on its face. It seems silly as all get-out to say that the donors are being defrauded by spending some of the money on GZ's bond.
imho, anyway. Others' mmv.
Click to expand...

Since the website said "living expenses and legal expenses," there was no fraud. But it is popular to assert Zimmerman is corrupt, thus messages like that. Does a non-lawyer like Zimmerman - who Sharon claims is really stupid - know whether or not "bail" is a "legal expense?" A "living expense?" Is it?
 
Last edited:
joko104 said:
Does a non-lawyer like Zimmerman - who Sharon claims is really stupid - know whether or not "bail" is a "legal expense?" A "living expense?" Is it?
Click to expand...
I would assume that it's perfectly acceptable for the money to be spent on bond. I was honestly surprised that the idea it could be fraud for Z to spend donations on bond.
 
whysoserious said:
Look at your ****ing avatar, guy. You're basically celebrating the death of a black teenager. It's ****ing pathetic.
Click to expand...

Yeah man, an avatar that shows Martin as a punk is clearly the celebration of a dead black kid. :thumbs:
 
Simon W. Moon said:
I would assume that it's perfectly acceptable for the money to be spent on bond. I was honestly surprised that the idea it could be fraud for Z to spend donations on bond.
Click to expand...


You know what they say about people who assume things.
 
joko104 said:
Since the website said "living expenses and legal expenses," there was no fraud. But it is popular to assert Zimmerman is corrupt, thus messages like that. Does a non-lawyer like Zimmerman - who Sharon claims is really stupid - know whether or not "bail" is a "legal expense?" A "living expense?" Is it?
Click to expand...

The only thing that is certain is that Shellie and George colluded to keep the information about the money from the court and from OMara.


Sanford detective: Trayvon Martin never used deadly force - Teens - Modbee.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom