• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Video: George Zimmerman's Reenactment of Trayvon Martin Shooting [W:1340]

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Zimmerman says... well, maybe Trayvon was going to kill me, but I felt scared and so I killed him to protect myself... then that's not as strong of a defense. As Excon likes to point out, another SYG case where a thief swung a bag of radios at a guy he robbed. He defense said, he feared for his life when the robber swung the back at so the defendant stabbed the robber to death. The defendant was found innocent under SYG.

So leaving room to suggest that Trayvon may have not intended to kill Zimmerman, isn't going to help Zimmerman's defense.

These two paragraphs/sentences explain why you are so badly misinformed about self defense.

All Zimmerman had to do was think Martin would harm him badly, he didn't have to fear for his life, that is NOT a requirement. Just like it is not a requirement for him to have sustained terrible life threatening injuries. In fact, he could have been justified in shooting TM without having sustained a scratch. Again, being injured is not a requirement.

You may want to double or triple your level of knowledge on this before speaking any further. I'm running out of facepalm gif's.
 
Last edited:
Moderator's Warning:
Over the 2k post limit, closing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom