• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Autopsy: Drug THC found in Trayvon Martin's system[W:22, 576]

Re: Autopsy: Drug THC found in Trayvon Martin's system

Caine said:
Umm..I wasn't speculating to ANYTHING to do with this case... how ****ing hard is that to understand?

My response was informative to the general topic of how THC is found in blood. Not to Anything dealing with the Zimmerman case. Go back and ****ing read for christ sakes.
Click to expand...

Your welcome for knowing all the facts...
 
SheWolf said:
It could tell us a number of things, but we don't know since the PD didn't preserve such evidence...
Click to expand...

Well, then Ms. expert..

List those number of things.........
 
Re: Autopsy: Drug THC found in Trayvon Martin's system

SheWolf said:
Your welcome for knowing all the facts...
Click to expand...

Don't give a **** about the THC in this case.

All it does is to prove the media lie of him being a "good angelic little prince" to be a big fat lie.

Has nothing to do with Zimmerman's guilt or innocence.
 
Caine said:
So if a guy was charged with Possession with Intent to Sell/Deliver cocaine, yet he was never actually in possession of cocaine and the substance was planted on him by 'dem evil crooked cops, and charges were dismissed by a judge because of it......

That guy should live with that arrest being mentioned any time he is a subject of an investigation, not just mentioned amongst the police, but to the victim's family, and subsequently to their attorneys and then the media......... right?

This is why its inappropriate for the police to mention anything other than convictions.
Click to expand...

Your example is dishonest and you have embarrassed yourself as a cop for even suggesting its the same thing. The man in your example would be able to sue the hell out of police dept, and the police dept would be in hot water concerning corruption. It would likely trigger a federal investigation of the PD and the accused would most likely be paid restitution for the time spent in jail.

At least try to be honest in this forum..
 
Caine said:
You are telling me everything I am saying is speculation, then asking questions that are entirely speculative.

Where are you going with this exactly?
Click to expand...

You're so biased, you can't debate logically...
 
Re: Autopsy: Drug THC found in Trayvon Martin's system

Caine said:
Don't give a **** about the THC in this case.

All it does is to prove the media lie of him being a "good angelic little prince" to be a big fat lie.

Has nothing to do with Zimmerman's guilt or innocence.
Click to expand...

I don't necessarily disagree with you...
 
Re: Autopsy: Drug THC found in Trayvon Martin's system[W:22]

Sheik Yerbuti said:
Excon said:
You were wrong then, and have again shown to be wrong.

Give it up. It was not "pitch black" as you claimed.
Click to expand...
Nope, the wrong one was you ...

"it wasn't dark" ~ Excon
Click to expand...

Look everybody, Yurbuti thinks he is going to deceive everyone by attributing an out of context partial quote to me.

Pathetic is what your attempt is called.



The more accurate description was Dusk.

You were wrong.
It wasn't "pitch black" as you claimed.

Get over it and stop trying to lie to everybody.
 
SheWolf said:
lol.... so you're saying if somebody's head is slammed into the ground, there is not going to blood stains on the concrete?
Click to expand...
Just because you do not understand that there may not be blood or even skin left behind is not my problem, but yours.

There is no lost evidence that we know of, so therefore they did not mess up big as you have alleged.


If they were required to tent the scene and then didn't you may have a point.
But of course you haven't provided any sort of requirement that they do so. Your argument fails.
 
Excon said:
Just because you do not understand that there may not be blood or even skin left behind is not my problem, but yours.

There is no lost evidence that we know of, so therefore they did not mess up big as you have alleged.


If they were required to tent the scene and then didn't you may have a point.
But of course you haven't provided any sort of requirement that they do so. Your argument fails.
Click to expand...

I'd say if there is no blood at all, that Zimmerman was lying
 
SheWolf said:
Your example is dishonest and you have embarrassed yourself as a cop for even suggesting its the same thing. The man in your example would be able to sue the hell out of police dept, and the police dept would be in hot water concerning corruption. It would likely trigger a federal investigation of the PD and the accused would most likely be paid restitution for the time spent in jail.

At least try to be honest in this forum..
Click to expand...

So, as with most arrests, often times the police do not have access to the full details of HOW a past arrest came to be, and CERTAINTLY do not have the details of what occurred in the court outside of "conviction" or "no conviction"..... So you mean to tell me that not having the knowledge they should tell the victim's family, and thereby the victim's lawyers, and then to the media, that this man was arrested for a crime which shows he has a history of violence even though he was never convicted (not being convicted shows he didn't do it)?

Its hard enough for me to find out what happened to MY OWN CASES in court for misdemeanors, how would you expect them to find out the details of what occurred from a past case?



Also, why are you repeatedly trying to tell me i'm "embarrassing myself as a cop".

You are aware that you speak from no position of authority on that matter, and I realize you are just trying to get under my skin (flame) me when you continue to say that or something similar in every post that you disagree with me on right?
 
Last edited:
SheWolf said:
I'd say if there is no blood at all, that Zimmerman was lying
Click to expand...

So the woman who shot herself in the shoulder last night, as witnessed by the Fire Department..........

If the fire department had not witnessed it, she didn't do it? Since there was NO BLOOD FOUND WHERE SHE SHOT HERSELF, except for a bloody handprint. No blood spatter anywhere on the side of that building.


SHE MUST BE LYING!!!


Blood spatter is a tricky thing, and just because there is a lack of it doesn't mean something didn't happen.
 
Excon said:
Just because you do not understand that there may not be blood or even skin left behind is not my problem, but yours.

There is no lost evidence that we know of, so therefore they did not mess up big as you have alleged.


If they were required to tent the scene and then didn't you may have a point.
But of course you haven't provided any sort of requirement that they do so. Your argument fails.
Click to expand...

WHAT TENTS?!

It WAS raining, not that it was going to rain. Once again I am asking SheWolf WHAT TENTS? WHO HAD "EVIDENCE TENTS?"
 
Last edited:
SheWolf said:
I'd say if there is no blood at all, that Zimmerman was lying
Click to expand...


That's funny. You're claiming that the doctor, police and every media source used complex software to artificially create wounds on Zimmerman and they all lied because you know Zimmerman wasn't hurt at all because there was on blood on the concrete in the rain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom