- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Ahh... hello!
Earth to Sharon.
What exactly does that have to do with what you quoted from me.
Or are you just trying to bait again?
Ahh... hello!
The trial will basically be between the prosecutor and defense attorney.
Zimmerman has been coached so much that he will be like Palin in her interview with Katie Couric. They will have months to train him what to say. His contribution will be minor.
It will come down to lawyer vs lawyer.
Sorry, they don't really coach.
As for the rest of what you said. That may be a good read on what will happen.
When they investigate afterwords and find that the vitim was unarmed or was just reaching for a phone, do the cops not get into some pretty serious trouble and the city typically gets sued? So, it sounds as if you agree that Trayvon was in the wrong or at least contributed to his own death.
Only an idiot would.
And if it makes it that far, I am sure a jury will, or be hung.But I don't think the "reasonable person" standard would agree with you.
Speaking with your client is not coaching.I guess the defense attorney barely even speaks to the client, right?
And if it makes it that far, I am sure a jury will, or be hung.
Speaking with your client is not coaching.
After thinking about it. Nah, it is mostly going to depend upon what Zimmerman says.
I doubt your doubts.I doubt Zimmerman will testify. I also doubt it will be a fair trial and anticipate the judge quashing most of the defense questions and lines of defense. Plus Zimmerman has really crappy attorneys that seem primarily motivated by fear. Afterall, they are up against the PRESIDENT of the United States, The US DOJ, the State Attorney General, and the judge - meaning both political parties gunning for Zimmerman.
If it were a level playing field, then I would say it would be up to jury selection.