- Joined
- Dec 2, 2015
- Messages
- 16,568
- Reaction score
- 7,253
- Location
- California Caliphate
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Three problems with this thread that you started:
The law you are referring to WAS PASSED ALMOST SIX YEARS AGO!!!! WHY ARE YOU BRINGING IT UP NOW!?!?!
Second issue: it is a guideline for prosecutors to decided if a case is worth it only....you do not get away scott-free if after the police arrests you (yes, you still get arrested for shoplifting ANY amount) but the prosecutor simply decides that if what you stole is under $950 and taking you to court over it is a waste of time, then he can choose prosecute you. YOU CAN STILL BE ARRESTED AND PROSECUTED FOR THEFTS $950 AND UNDER!!!!!
Third issue...if you think $950 is too of a threshold, or if you believe that there should be no threshold at all for a prosecutor...then explain the Texas version of this law in that red state where the amount is $1500, only $550 more than San Fran. WHY AREN'T YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT THAT!?!?!
Sorry for the all caps in some of this, but sometimes people are either not thinking when they post, or they are working for the Russians in an effort to divide our nation by bringing up old topics to keep people angry. I mean, it took me literally less than 30 seconds to figure out this is a nothing burger...but some of you are either too lazy or too ignorant to figure it out for yourselves....or perhaps you just like being angry all the time...which is pretty sad.
You don’t know squat about what is going on in San Francisco.
The High Cost of Low-level Crime in San Francisco | City Journal
Last edited: