• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is wrong with you?

OpportunityCost said:
How pedantic. Trump was talking about both groups present at Charlottesville, because you are talking about Trump, you are talking about the Neo-Nazis and Antifa. Denying you are doing so is denying the facts of the discussion, lie to someone else, I'm not buying it.
Click to expand...

You keep trying to change the discussion from people who are intolerant of Neo-Nazis, the people President Trump condemned in the "strongest possible terms", why can't you honestly address that?
 
Oborosen said:
Alright then, try and put your spin on this.
If the man was a terrorist, then why did he not get charged with that crime?

Man arrested for firing gun at Charlottesville rally - CNN

This is common sense 101, the man was a jackass yes.
But what he did was not terrorism, and you should be able to see that from what he was charged with in the first place.

If you want a reference for terrorist, just look up Antifa.
Click to expand...

I don't think we need to keep lowering the bar on how we charge crimes. Is the person who vandalized a confederate monument a terrorist? Or is he only a terrorist if he vandalizes a Lincoln statue. Or is he just some idiot with spray paint and a lack of impulse control.
 
Absentglare said:
You keep trying to change the discussion from people who are intolerant of Neo-Nazis, the people President Trump condemned in the "strongest possible terms", why can't you honestly address that?
Click to expand...

You keep trying to discuss things that happened in your imaginary world instead of what happened in the real one.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, it hasn't fallen apart due to any reason. Subpoenas have been issue, homes raided with search warrants, grand juries have been empaneled, etc... Your desperation to downplay those facts is almost palpable.

Sad.
Click to expand...

And still, after all the subpoenas have been issued, homes raided, search warrants, grand juries empaneled, and 8 months of trying, the left and its dogs have come up with zip. That's a fact.
 
chuckiechan said:
I don't think we need to keep lowering the bar on how we charge crimes. Is the person who vandalized a confederate monument a terrorist? Or is he only a terrorist if he vandalizes a Lincoln statue. Or is he just some idiot with spray paint and a lack of impulse control.
Click to expand...

No the jackass with the spray can is a vandal, and he would be charged with the crime of vandalism. So to would the people who normally just knock down a statue, and leave.

We have set defining laws, and codes that describe what makes a crime, and what allocates it to a degree of severity. Its the same as how we can separate theft, from grand theft.

You can try to move the goal post here all you want, but the fact of the matter was that this man is not a terrorist -plain & simple-.

A racist dumbass yes, but not a terrorist.
 
jimbo said:
And still, after all the subpoenas have been issued, homes raided, search warrants, grand juries empaneled, and 8 months of trying, the left and its dogs have come up with zip. That's a fact.
Click to expand...

No, it's not a fact. They haven't made any findings public, which is completely normal w/ongoing investigations.

"The left" isn't trying to come up with anything. A very conservative, lifelong Republican name Mueller and his team, however, are. You have every right to be nervous.
 
ocean515 said:
There is zero evidence of your claim. Making up numbers invented through ideological bias accomplishes nothing. Credibility vanishes.

That is just an example of pure ignorant bigotry and prejudice.

It can't be your goal to establish that perception?
Click to expand...

I call those people Democrat Supremacists.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, it's not a fact. They haven't made any findings public, which is completely normal w/ongoing investigations.

"The left" isn't trying to come up with anything. A very conservative, lifelong Republican name Mueller and his team, however, are. You have every right to be nervous.
Click to expand...

... so what you are saying is that you know they found stuff... they just haven't told you yet?

You do realize you have entered the religion zone at this point, right?
 
jmotivator said:
... so what you are saying is that you know they found stuff... they just haven't told you yet?

You do realize you have entered the religion zone at this point, right?
Click to expand...

No, that's not what I'm saying in the least.

I'm saying that their findings are withheld until the investigations are completed and proper legal steps have been taken. That's simply objective reality; no religion involved in that whatsoever.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, that's not what I'm saying in the least.

I'm saying that their findings are withheld until the investigations are completed and proper legal steps have been taken. That's simply objective reality; no religion involved in that whatsoever.
Click to expand...

You are arguing the existence of something that you then turn around and argue you have no way of knowing.
 
jmotivator said:
You are arguing the existence of something that you then turn around and argue you have no way of knowing.
Click to expand...

No, I'm not doing that. I'm arguing that there's no way for us to know until such a time as when the investigations are completed.

Really basic, ground-level stuff here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom