The realities of U.S necessities

In the U.S, if a person has no monies, it is difficult for them to live. The U.S is a capitalistic Country unlike Socialist Countries which enable the citizens to survive without the absolute needs to possess monies. It is within these monies that the U.S has its 'strength'.


Although a person may be known to be an illegal resident and although that person is known to kill and murder legal residents and citizens, many are stumped when it comes to dealing with them.

I have been informed of several illegal persons, undoumented and even a part of the Is.iL recruiting system/network in the U.S State I reside in and am a registered resident of. I relayed these informations to the proper local Authorities but I do not think they have addressed these information submissions up to now.

Although the State I reside in is not held greatly as a U.S patriotic State and although there are way more non Patriots than there are Patriots, it is still, nonetheless, a U.S. State. They have State Laws under Federal Laws which the State has its State Seal upon but since they are not protecting their State Seal, their State is becoming more and more filled with illegals, documented and not.


It wouldn't seem to be off path if one day it is found out that State and illegals, both unregistered and undocumented as well as Is.iL members were more of 'friends' than foes.

But this goes AGAINST National Security.

And yes, the State I reside in is one of the States which are seeking and petitioning, with the greatest urgency, to be separated from The Federal Government.

Once and if this State, or Land, is separated and forms its own Government System, what they decide to do with the illegals, both registered and non registered, will be under their Judicial Processes. Until then, the illegals, both registered and non registered are under State Judicial Processes under Federal Judicial Processes. But because Law is not being upheld, the citizens, both legal and illegal, are becoming more illegal in activity than legal, which would be the obvious result.

When Law is not upheld, deterrent, crime and law-less-ness will obviously increase.

crazyme said:

In the U.S, if a person has no monies, it is difficult for them to live. The U.S is a capitalistic Country unlike Socialist Countries which enable the citizens to survive without the absolute needs to possess monies. It is within these monies that the U.S has its 'strength'.


Although a person may be known to be an illegal resident and although that person is known to kill and murder legal residents and citizens, many are stumped when it comes to dealing with them.

Click to expand...

Socialism has killed over 100 million people in the last century.

However there are many legal citizens and legal residents that are needing to live and survive under this kind of non deterrent Judicial System. And as law-less-ness is increasing, their well being is decreasing.

Some do not have the means to relocate out of State but many already have. The ones that were able already relocated. For those that are still here remaining, many factors prevent them from doing so.

You can live in the US without money. It is far from ideal but you can get food, a place to sleep, and emergency medical treatment. I have lived in countries where that is not the case. In the US the bigger problem is with the mentally ill because they often don’t have enough presence of mind to seek out the various avenues of aid that are available.

The factors which are causing this to occur:

Free sexual Laws
Free drug Laws
Less restrictive Laws; such as personal property Laws and Civilan duties Laws.

enderpotato00 said:

Socialism has killed over 100 million people in the last century.

Click to expand...

I heard it was closer to 14,000,000,000,000,000,000!!!!!

crazyme said:

I have been informed of several illegal persons, undoumented and even a part of the Is.iL recruiting system/network in the U.S State I reside in and am a registered resident of. I relayed these informations to the proper local Authorities but I do not think they have addressed these information submissions up to now.

Although the State I reside in is not held greatly as a U.S patriotic State and although there are way more non Patriots than there are Patriots, it is still, nonetheless, a U.S. State. They have State Laws under Federal Laws which the State has its State Seal upon but since they are not protecting their State Seal, their State is becoming more and more filled with illegals, documented and not.


It wouldn't seem to be off path if one day it is found out that State and illegals, both unregistered and undocumented as well as Is.iL members were more of 'friends' than foes.

But this goes AGAINST National Security.

Click to expand...

Huh. How do we know you're not part of the ISIL recruiting system?

enderpotato00 said:

Socialism has killed over 100 million people in the last century.

Click to expand...

I disagree. Socialism didn't kill. The competition brought to Socialism, killed. Had Socialism not encountered such fierce lying accusations, false ideas, false encouragements from the competitors, they probably would have remained fine as they were before their need to be like Karl Marx.


Karl Marx and Charles Darwin... what do they teach in common?


SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST.


The ignorance is not upon the monies nor the lack of need. It is upon the lack of Law Keeping in either, within any Government System.


How is Afghanistan's monetary values/worth? Not too high? Then why so many wars and fighting within Afghanistan if monies is not one of the main causes? Lack of Law keeping.

Skeptic Bob said:

You can live in the US without money. It is far from ideal but you can get food, a place to sleep, and emergency medical treatment. I have lived in countries where that is not the case. In the US the bigger problem is with the mentally ill because they often don’t have enough presence of mind to seek out the various avenues of aid that are available.

Click to expand...

Surely you mean "monies".

Federal has the H.O.R., or, House Of Representatives, representing the W.E., of The U S.

W.H.O.R.E.


The 'W.E' surround the 'H.O.R' and the 'H.O.R' keeps the 'W.E' afloat.


Without the H.O.R keeping and upholding Law, the 'W.E' is susceptible to Law-less-ness.

The surprise box on the doorstep..... of Secretary Treaurer of The U.S received a box of cow/horse (?) manure signed, 'the people' of The U.S. (?) or America?

Questions:
Who handles manure to be able to place it in a box and then to wrap It?

Who has access to cows or horses and their manure piles?

How did the box get transported to the doorstep from a cow or horse manure pile, boxed and wrapped,. Was it done by hand or by shovel?

Etc...


Signed, 'The People'? U.S?


Since then what has the H.O.R done about what they do, which is to oversee Laws and Bills and Policies within The States they represent as well as for National Well Being and security?


The H.O.R upholds those they are upholding, namely the W.E, The People, of The United States. Just as the few are within the many, the H.O.R is within the W.E.


<W> H.O.R <E>


Ask yourself if you know anyone who lives apart from the lifestyle of the W. - H.O.R - E.


Even U.S military backs 'her' up.

How did the House of Representatives become like such in only 231 years?

It only took 231 years for them to be okay with underage children learning about anal sex while attending grade School. 50 years ago, anal sex was only for the pornographic actors and actresses, not for everyday civilian living. Even within the Pornographic Industry, anal sex was the least portrayed and was a 'new thing' that was emerging within the Pornographic industry.


Today, within the Pornographic Industry, you can find the bestiality films where humans and beasts(animals) are filmed. Beastialty might be as obscure today as anal sex was then but maybe one day beastialty will be taught in grade schools.


Are you voting for or against it?

Currently, in the DSM5, Psychiatric diagnosis manual, having thoughts of engaging in sexual acts with minors and underage children is NOT a disorder IF those thoughts do not have a negative impact in your day to day responsibilities.


What IF I have no daily responsibilities?

What would a wise ruler do?

Proverbs 20:26. "A wise king scattereth the wicked, and bringeth the wheel over them."


Divide/Separate the wicked and put them to physical manual labor.


But of course such 'forced labor' is unjust in a Free Country, right?


When neither king or Judicial System deters wrong doing, Law-Less-ness occurs rampantly.

crazyme said:

I disagree. Socialism didn't kill. The competition brought to Socialism, killed. Had Socialism not encountered such fierce lying accusations, false ideas, false encouragements from the competitors, they probably would have remained fine as they were before their need to be like Karl Marx.


Karl Marx and Charles Darwin... what do they teach in common?


SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST.


The ignorance is not upon the monies nor the lack of need. It is upon the lack of Law Keeping in either, within any Government System.


How is Afghanistan's monetary values/worth? Not too high? Then why so many wars and fighting within Afghanistan if monies is not one of the main causes? Lack of Law keeping.

Click to expand...

It’s complete and utter bull****. It will just kill more

Currently, in the DSM5, Psychiatric diagnosis manual, having thoughts of engaging in sexual acts with monies and underage children is NOT a disorder IF those thoughts do not have a negative impact in your day to day responsibilities.


And unless real changes and corrections are made, these acts will not, ON their own, come to a stop. The Word 'abomination' means such.... That the act, the abominable act/action, will NOT stop if left uncorrected or unchanged. Imagine an abominable snow ball rolling down a snow mountain.


Lips that lie are abomination. How? Lips that lie, if not corrected or changed, will NOT stop lying, even if speaking with The LORD.


Proverbs 12:22. "Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are his delight."


Even, unto, The LORD. All the way unto/to The LORD. Lips that lie will lie all the way up unto/to The LORD if not corrected or changed.

So as certain States desire to rule autonomously, what will Federal provide for their requests?


You have the Federal House as well as independent State houses.


Yet they 'represent' the People of each. House of Represent-atives.


What does tentative mean?

'not certain or fixed; provisional'.


The house of represent-atives is ten-tatives.

Pro tip. If you post more in your own thread than anyone else, or all others combine...you're doing it wrong.

It doesn't have to be either/or. Most countries are some mix of capitalism and socialism. The red tide socialism that rightists in the U.S. like to refer to was actually Stalinism, and not socialism as we know it in the modern western world.

It's also been debunked in the more socialist countries that if a lot is provided to you, you'll become lazy. The opposite happens. When people are supported they have a greater opportunity to self-actualize, in turn providing for themselves and society through their natural talents.

Societies that lean more toward capitalism make people pursue money rather than happiness. The goal becomes mass accumulation of property and wealth rather than looking at the aspects of life that are truly fulfilling, the things that money can't really buy. In the U.S., average vacation time is 2 weeks per year, and you can't get good health care unless you have work benefits. Education is also outrageously expensive. So the things in life that really matter get swept aside by huge sacrifices, mostly related to money making.

I don't think capitalism makes individuals in the U.S. strong, but it does make the government strong. When everyone is forced to work to produce goods and services that benefit the state through taxation, the country becomes more powerful, but its people become less self-actualized. I'd rather see a smaller government and a less productive workforce so that people can have time to live real, human lives.

I guess it depends on your priorities. I'm not saying that you can't self-actualize under capitalism, just that it's not easy when there is mass wealth sequestration happening. Nobody really needs billions of dollars to find fulfillment. At some point it turns to megalomania which is actually a sign that the person has failed to self-actualize, at the cost of everyone else.