• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's toughness is paying off

M

Mountainmanbob

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
152
Reaction score
21
Newt Gingrich: Trump?s GDP achieves Mission Impossible (and shocks his critics) | Fox News

As it turns out, despite refrains from the elites in the media and establishment, the self-made billionaire who now leads our country knows quite a bit about creating a healthy economy.

As I explained Friday during a Facebook Live talk, the president’s massive deregulation effort, his success in cutting taxes on individuals and businesses, and his plan to renegotiate our international trade agreements have started to pay dividends.
 
Last edited:
When the economy goes south are your going to blame everything/everyone else besides Trump?
 
Middleground said:
When the economy goes south are your going to blame everything/everyone else besides Trump?
Click to expand...

And if it doesn't go south, will liberals continue to ignore every Trump success while drumming up every conceivable negative? Will they hate him no matter what he does? i think so...

President Trump is strongly against Globalists. He refuses to allow the US to become a migrant camp like Europe. And he will be hated for all time. The Globalist Elite will be sure of it. However, the new radical democratic socialism that is taking over the democratic party that people like to label "progressive" (which is really proto-communism) will most likely lead to another GOP victory in 2020.
 
Mountainmanbob said:
Newt Gingrich: Trump?s GDP achieves Mission Impossible (and shocks his critics) | Fox News

As it turns out, despite refrains from the elites in the media and establishment, the self-made billionaire who now leads our country knows quite a bit about creating a healthy economy.

As I explained Friday during a Facebook Live talk, the president’s massive deregulation effort, his success in cutting taxes on individuals and businesses, and his plan to renegotiate our international trade agreements have started to pay dividends.
Click to expand...

Do you meant the "toughness" shown by sending insane tweets all day Sunday?
 
Oceanborn said:
And if it doesn't go south, will liberals continue to ignore every Trump success while drumming up every conceivable negative? Will they hate him no matter what he does? i think so...

President Trump is strongly against Globalists. He refuses to allow the US to become a migrant camp like Europe. And he will be hated for all time. The Globalist Elite will be sure of it. However, the new radical democratic socialism that is taking over the democratic party that people like to label "progressive" (which is really proto-communism) will most likely lead to another GOP victory in 2020.
Click to expand...

Trump's main success is convincing people who are too stupid to know Sacha Cohen is duping them that he is doing a good job.
 
And a liberal's main success is blindly following and believing everything Hillary says and does while simultaneously calling people who disagree with such a ridiculous narrative as "too stupid." The density of Clinton supporters usually exceeds osmium, and yet i don't point that out in every post i make in disagreement with leftists. It's a weak argument at best.
 
Oceanborn said:
And a liberal's main success is blindly following and believing everything Hillary says and does while simultaneously calling people who disagree with such a ridiculous narrative as "too stupid." The density of Clinton supporters usually exceeds osmium, and yet i don't point that out in every post i make in disagreement with leftists. It's a weak argument at best.
Click to expand...

Weak arguments include the term "leftists" when discussing Hillary, who wasn't left at all. Bernie had the support of the leftists.
 
calamity said:
Weak arguments include the term "leftists" when discussing Hillary, who wasn't left at all. Bernie had the support of the leftists.
Click to expand...

And yet....Bernie couldn't even make it through the primaries. Huh. I wonder why?
 
KevinKohler said:
And yet....Bernie couldn't even make it through the primaries. Huh. I wonder why?
Click to expand...

Because few people want a wild-eyed socialist as president.
 
Mountainmanbob said:
Do you mean like when Obama blamed Bush for everything? No we do not do that up top the mountain.

M-Bob
Click to expand...

He had very good reason to blame Bush. He inherited massive debt and a horrible economy. You going to deny that?
 
calamity said:
Weak arguments include the term "leftists" when discussing Hillary, who wasn't left at all. Bernie had the support of the leftists.
Click to expand...
Bernie had the support of white leftists.
 
Oceanborn said:
And a liberal's main success is blindly following and believing everything Hillary says and does while simultaneously calling people who disagree with such a ridiculous narrative as "too stupid." The density of Clinton supporters usually exceeds osmium, and yet i don't point that out in every post i make in disagreement with leftists. It's a weak argument at best.
Click to expand...

More deflection,the Trump supporters 101 excuse
 
KevinKohler said:
I think he had a solid base. I think you are avoiding the real reason.
Click to expand...

Hillary received millions of more votes. He had a base...a base of coffee shop brohs and idealists. Hillary was the pragmatic, Centrist candidate. If she wasn't Bill's wife, I would have voted for her. So, I voted Kasich instead.
 
calamity said:
Hillary received millions of more votes. He had a base...a base of coffee shop brohs and idealists. Hillary was the pragmatic, Centrist candidate. If she wasn't Bill's wife, I would have voted for her. So, I voted Kasich instead.
Click to expand...

You didn't like Bill? I thought he was a pretty solid president, minus Nafta. Which would have simply gone in under Gdub.
 
KevinKohler said:
You didn't like Bill? I thought he was a pretty solid president, minus Nafta. Which would have simply gone in under Gdub.
Click to expand...

Bill was fine, but he served two terms. Unlike the Republicans, I don't violate the spirit of the Constitution. No way I vote for the wife of a two-term president. I would, maybe, if they were divorced and no longer living together. But, even then, I'd hesitate.
 
calamity said:
Bill was fine, but he served two terms. Unlike the Republicans, I don't violate the spirit of the Constitution. No way I vote for the wife of a two-term president. I would, maybe, if they were divorced and no longer living together. But, even then, I'd hesitate.
Click to expand...

Oh, I see...I can respect that.
 
calamity said:
Trump's main success is convincing people who are too stupid to know Sacha Cohen is duping them that he is doing a good job.
Click to expand...

Weak arguments include Sacha Cohen or saying Hillary was not left? What?
 
Common Sense 1 said:
Weak arguments include Sacha Cohen or saying Hillary was not left? What?
Click to expand...

She wasn't; and Sacha Cohen is kicking ass and taking names. Roy Moore and the "sexual predator detector" is must see TV.
 
calamity said:
Hillary received millions of more votes. He had a base...a base of coffee shop brohs and idealists. Hillary was the pragmatic, Centrist candidate. If she wasn't Bill's wife, I would have voted for her. So, I voted Kasich instead.
Click to expand...

Hillary lost and everyone is tired of hearing all the stupid excuses why she lost. The key is Trump beat her to the horror of the media, Hollywood, and the anti's....... ;)
 
calamity said:
Bill was fine, but he served two terms. Unlike the Republicans, I don't violate the spirit of the Constitution. No way I vote for the wife of a two-term president. I would, maybe, if they were divorced and no longer living together. But, even then, I'd hesitate.
Click to expand...

Hillary standing for President doesn't violate the spirit of the constitution in the slightest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom