• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?

RetiredNSmilin said:
Yup, don't you just hate it when that happens.

You might know this....wasn't there a plot to assassinate Hitler late in the war but they called it off because he was making so many bad decisions and micromanaging the whole effort so terribly?

I heard that once on The Top Ten Infantry rifles show. They were going to use a 98K Mauser.
Click to expand...

Don't get me wrong, the way Hitler seized power was quite ingenious. He was like an anti-Einstein, and he pretty much conquered Europe. But, about halfway through the war the syphilis (And another illness I can't recall at the moment) took its toll on him, and he began losing really badly, due entirely to his own inability to command and make rational decisions. He'd fall on the carpet and bite/chew it until his teeth bled, he'd go utterly ballistic, hysterical, accusing people of trying to poison him, and his own hubris was the only true origin of his paranoia. He was too vainglorious to see the simple fact that he was dying. I'd almost feel sorry for him if he wasn't pure evil.
 
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you.
Click to expand...

Do I need to read the rest of that post to know that it will be really, really stupid?
 
MaggieD said:
There is more to leadership than physical stamina and strength. As long as a woman is well through menopause, I'm a possible supporter for POTUS. It occurs to me that we live in a violent world run by men. Perhaps it's PAST time to try something else.
Click to expand...

The rest of the human race decided it was "past time" millenia ago. Curiously, the United States is having a difficult time imagining a female leader.

TheGoverness said:
So, something like this?

View attachment 67207668
Click to expand...

Thank you for that nightmare fuel.
 
Sparky2 said:
Married women control 50% of the money, and 100% of the vagina.
Click to expand...
You sort of halfway did this one.

"Women have half the money and all the p****. And when you have all the p****, it's just a matter of time before you have all the money."

I can't remember who said it. But it's gold.
 
matchlight said:
You seem to be assuming that a female leader, by being less willing to use violence to solve national problems, would make things safer.
Click to expand...

Yeah, because it's not like a woman to ever start a fight for no reason.
 
Brewdog said:
You sort of halfway did this one.

"Women have half the money and all the p****. And when you have all the p****, it's just a matter of time before you have all the money."

I can't remember who said it. But it's gold.
Click to expand...

I was just trying to avoid all the *******'s.

They cramp my writing style.
:(
 
Brewdog said:
Yeah, because it's not like a woman to ever start a fight for no reason.
Click to expand...

I have been around a few women like that. Not for long. Even if your lovemaking is pure ecstasy for both of you, it's hardly worth it if, a few hours later, she suddenly blows up and starts cursing you for no apparent reason.

As to a woman being a safer national leader because she was more hesitant to use force to solve problems, I think that is the very thing that would make her more dangerous in that role. Most people don't like to think it, but when the U.S. deals with nations that are not its good allies, it is as if it were a prison inmate who doesn't want any trouble having to deal with other inmates who want nothing but trouble. The best way for that inmate to protect himself is to be bigger and stronger than anyone else there, and to make sure they are very certain he is ready, willing, and able to crush anyone foolish enough ever to provoke him.
 
Last edited:
Abbazorkzog said:
Don't get me wrong, the way Hitler seized power was quite ingenious. He was like an anti-Einstein, and he pretty much conquered Europe. But, about halfway through the war the syphilis (And another illness I can't recall at the moment) took its toll on him, and he began losing really badly, due entirely to his own inability to command and make rational decisions. He'd fall on the carpet and bite/chew it until his teeth bled, he'd go utterly ballistic, hysterical, accusing people of trying to poison him, and his own hubris was the only true origin of his paranoia. He was too vainglorious to see the simple fact that he was dying. I'd almost feel sorry for him if he wasn't pure evil.
Click to expand...

I have always thought Germany would have been a very strong PEACEFUL power in Europe had they gotten rid of him in about 1937 or so. The country was prosperous, and doing well after all the hell they went through earlier.

but NO, they just HAD to start yet another war again.

To paraphrase Klause the fish in American Dad.....I am German, it is what we do....

There is a joke, that a German dad received an unassembled baby crib in the mail. No matter how many times he tried, it always turned out to be a Maxim Machine gun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom