- Joined
- Jul 8, 2016
- Messages
- 18,652
- Reaction score
- 13,565
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?
Why not?
Why not?
The people who won't even consider a qualified woman as a leader are misogynists.
A lot of them will be mighty unhappy after Clinton hands Trump his butt in November.
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?
similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?
Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==
According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==
This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?
This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?
this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.
‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown
constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated!
There is more to leadership than physical stamina and strength. As long as a woman is well through menopause, I'm a possible supporter for POTUS. It occurs to me that we live in a violent world run by men. Perhaps it's PAST time to try something else.
New poster making a trolling post.
Boy, that's something we never see around here....:roll:
The people who won't even consider a qualified woman as a leader are misogynists.
A lot of them will be mighty unhappy after Clinton hands Trump his butt in November.
There is more to leadership than physical stamina and strength. As long as a woman is well through menopause, I'm a possible supporter for POTUS. It occurs to me that we live in a violent world run by men. Perhaps it's PAST time to try something else.
There is more to leadership than physical stamina and strength. .
There is more to leadership than physical strength, my friend. Intelligence is a huge factor when it comes to being a good leader.
I would argue that strength is among the least important leadership qualities. Stamina? There's little to suggest that stamina is an exclusive male trait.
It's not what's between your legs or in your arms that matters. It's your ability to convince others to do the heavy lifting.
There is more to leadership than physical strength, my friend. Intelligence is a huge factor when it comes to being a good leader.
You don't appear to be acquainted with either reason or logic, so I find it rather amusing that you'd attempt to reference them.
you don't appear to have any good points or arguments to bring to the discussion. thanks for your reply though.
Physical strength is necessarily a hallmark of intelligence.
Research studies suggest that men get most of their intelligence from their mother.
Heredity Theory Says in Males, Intelligence Comes From Mom - WSJ
The people who won't even consider a qualified woman as a leader are misogynists.
A lot of them will be mighty unhappy after Clinton hands Trump his butt in November.
Holy ****...are you clueless on this - no offense.
Men are far more competitive, violent, aggressive, territorial, sexually driven and are far more easily corrupted...NONE of these are good things for a POTUS to possess. And all of these can override rationality and logic.
A good POTUS must possess intellect, emotional strength, compassion, rationality, common sense, practicality and honor (among other things). And none of these strike me as something men have in greater abundance than woman.
I think the average woman would make a FAR better POTUS than the average man (with exceptions...Hillary Clinton for one - though Trump strikes me as a buffoon...so America is politically screwed for the next 4 years, imo).
great points I agree with.
if I understand correctly, you're saying that leadership is essentially being a good manipulator of people...'do this or that because of this or that reason'
the best leaders are the best manipulators/can convince the most people..
re: stamina. yes everyone has stamina. if you look at marathon records, and any running records in general, you will see that men generally lead woman by 10-20% in all events/categories....
why is this a factor?
because when a leader start's telling people 'do this', or 'do that' ..... having actual knowledge and understanding of abilities and capabilities is important...
I read it in a book or my advisor told me so, are not bad necessarily, but may not necessarily be the best
good point. so what qualifies someone as a leader?
Imagine you’re taking a journey across the arctic north pole.
On that journey you can take ‘guide’ animal with you. The guide animal is well trained, (like a hunting/companion dog) to fetch food for you , travel with you, and protect you until you reach your destination.
Would you choose a polar bear, or a north American grizzly bear?
Why?
similar situation, except this time you are taking a journey through the amazon rain-forest.
What guide-animal would you take? A jaguar or a Siberian snow leopard?
Why?
Hopefully you would choose the polar bear and the jaguar, because they are specially adapted to those environments, they know and understand and have an inherent natural understanding of those environments, and because of that, choosing them would give you the greatest chance of having the safest and most successful journey.
==
According to the Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey, women comprise 48 percent of the U.S. workforce but just 24 percent of workers in STEM fields.
The workforce numbers widen even further when you look at the fields that require physical muscular strength and endurance like building and construction.
From these points you can logically deduce that generally speaking this world is designed, engineered, built, constructed and created by men.
==
This is a physical world.
Men are physically superior to women. Generally by 10%-20% in physical stamina (running) and 50%-100% in physical strength (power lifting).
This world is governed by rules and laws that are based on principles of reason and logic. (rule of law, laws of gravity and motion, etc). Men are generally more logical , reasonable and rational thinkers, whereas women generally operate more from emotion.
==
Why would a person to choose a women to be their leader?
This is a physical world that operates on rules and laws that are governed by reason and logic.
If men lead women in all these categories, as statistical data indicates, wouldn’t it be a wiser, more intelligent choice to choose a man to lead and guide?
this is not intended to demean, belittle, reduce the importance of women or the incredible value they have. Certainly they have gifts and abilities that equal or outweigh all of the mans gifts and abilities.
‘A village of 10 men and 10 women can conquer a nation of 100,000 men, given time’ -unknown
constructive thoughts, opinions, feedback appreciated!
Bull****, and you know it. I'm still waiting for a literal muscle head to run for President.
There are plenty of women that would make a fantastic Madame President:
- Elizabeth Warren
- Nina Turner
- Tulsi Gabbard
- Zephyr Teachout
- Sigourney Weaver
You name it.