• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Welcome to the Schiff Show Trials! Greatest Farce on Earth - Smoke, Mirrors and Tears

Doc91478 said:
Adam Schiff's new roadie....
Dqueen.jpg
Click to expand...

I had no idea that you were attracted to transvestites.

And it's not my biz.

Night!
 
Have all the fun you want. Any way you slice it, Trump is not going to be removed from office.

Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! Fun to watch the easily suckered believe that sucker-bait.

The text record of the call was placed on a server of the highest level of secrecy.

Your own link specifically says: "MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION "

Some people wear the leashes of their masters w/out knowing that they're doing it.

And that makes the masters happy.
Click to expand...
 
Doc91478 said:
What documents would you have Pres. Trump release? He's already declassified and released the transcript of his conversation with President Zelensky proving there was no quid pro quo..... unlike the self confessed then VP Joe Biden......
Click to expand...

POTUS has not released documents requested to a co-equal branch of government and has obstructed the House and kept those called to testify from doing so. If he were innocent he would allow those called to clear his name and prove his bogus claim of a witch hunt. He hasn't, he won't, he can't because to do would to admit his guilt.
 
Doc91478 said:
If that's the case according to you and you've already condemned him, why don't you soak the rope, march on 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, pull Trump from the White House and hang him from the nearest tree or street light?
Click to expand...

Why won't he supply documents and allow those subpoenaed to testify and prove his innocence? It's just not rational. The rest of your post is really sickening.
 
Doc91478 said:
What documents would you have Pres. Trump release? He's already declassified and released the transcript of his conversation with President Zelensky proving there was no quid pro quo..... unlike the self confessed then VP Joe Biden......
Click to expand...

You know. The one's that prove his innocence. It's really simple.
 
Doc91478 said:
If that's the case according to you and you've already condemned him, why don't you soak the rope, march on 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, pull Trump from the White House and hang him from the nearest tree or street light?
Click to expand...

“You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart, right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”
 
SDET said:
I heard it's Carlos Danger.
Click to expand...


Nah! It's Pissi Myles a full-time drag queen from New Jersey who performs at a number of gay bars in New York City. She was scouted at one of them on Sunday night for the gig of a lifetime. The Hollywood Reporter caught up with Pissi at the tail end of her whirlwind day in Washington.
It's 6'8" in heels...
 
HumblePi said:
“You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart, right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”
Click to expand...

You mean like the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, while the real spies that got the information out and passed it to Koval got away with it. Marxist Socialist Democrats all working for the Russians...
 
Doc91478 said:
Schiff just might destroy the democrat party!!!! .
Click to expand...


Good.

The GOp is already a CORPSE so why not the DEmocratic Party too?

We can have Trumpism and liberal nuts.

Dude, the country is toast.
 
HumblePi said:
Where's all the people who can put this to rest if they only appeared to testify? Where's Rudy and Mulvaney, how about John Bolton or Mike Pompeo. What do they have to hide?
Click to expand...

They may actually do that if the democrats had any real evidence beside hearsay. This is even a more pathetic witch hunt than the collusion lie.
 
Doc91478 said:
You mean like the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, while the real spies that got the information out and passed it to Koval got away with it. Marxist Socialist Democrats all working for the Russians...
Click to expand...

Ask Trump, that's his quote.
 
PIPEWRENCH said:
They may actually do that if the democrats had any real evidence beside hearsay. This is even a more pathetic witch hunt than the collusion lie.
Click to expand...

The Democrats would have a ton of evidence if even one of them testified. They're the ones with first-hand knowledge. But of course, they can't testify, they've been warned by Trump.

People that are truthful have nothing to hide and don't defy Congressional subpoenas.
 
HumblePi said:
The Democrats would have a ton of evidence if even one of them testified. They're the ones with first-hand knowledge. But of course, they can't testify, they've been warned by Trump.

People that are truthful have nothing to hide and don't defy Congressional subpoenas.
Click to expand...
That would be a change. No one yet has first hand knowledge of anything. The only primary source is archive record Trump released.
 
HumblePi said:
The Democrats would have a ton of evidence if even one of them testified. They're the ones with first-hand knowledge. But of course, they can't testify, they've been warned by Trump.

People that are truthful have nothing to hide and don't defy Congressional subpoenas.
Click to expand...

Like Eric Holder?
 
Jay59 said:
That would be a change. No one yet has first hand knowledge of anything. The only primary source is archive record Trump released.
Click to expand...

Yes, it would be a change if Trump didn't obstruct justice by refusing to let anyone with first-hand knowledge comply with a legal Congressional subpoena. We might all learn something.
 
HumblePi said:
Is he in prison?
Click to expand...

He defied a Congressional Subpoena and withheld information and conversations regarding Fast and Furious and became the first censured Attorney General. You tell me, should he have gone to prison?
 
OpportunityCost said:
He defied a Congressional Subpoena and withheld information and conversations regarding Fast and Furious and became the first censured Attorney General. You tell me, should he have gone to prison?
Click to expand...

No, he shouldn't have gone to prison. The House launched an investigation, and here’s the thing: Holder cooperated. Eric Holder spent several days on Capitol Hill getting his ass chewed out over the whole thing. He handed over more than 7,600 documents. Other administration officials were subpoenaed, and they testified. The head of the ATF was forced out.

But the House didn’t find what it wanted. It didn’t find something so damning that it could stick it to the President. In the meanwhile, conspiracy-theory-prone Tea Party congress-critters mixed up various parts distortions, errors, partial truths, and in several instances, outright fabrications, to gin up the controversy and demand more documents.

Because there were numerous criminal prosecutions going on, there were a lot of things that couldn’t be released without screwing up active criminal prosecutions and ongoing investigations. That was the point where Holder basically had enough. The White House put its foot down and said, “We’ve given you everything that’s relevant and a bit more.”

Republicans refused to work out any deals. There was no viewing behind closed doors like with earlier contempt citations. There were no negotiations about what was legit and what was not. Republicans had adopted a complete scorched earth approach; no compromise, nothing less than capitulation to every demand they made.

And that’s really what made Eric Holder’s contempt process unique: there was no amount of cooperation that he could have possibly engaged in that would have not resulted in Republicans holding him in contempt. That was the goal: create a scandal, whether there really was one or not.

Eric Holder was far from the first person to resist a Congressional subpoena, or even outright ignore one as at least 12 of Trump's 'boys' have done. But Eric Holder was really the first one where a Congress was so completely, utterly unreasonable about what they wanted as to force that particular issue.

Now you finally know the whole truth and you can stop using Eric Holder as an excuse for Trump obstructing justice.
 
HumblePi said:
Yes, it would be a change if Trump didn't obstruct justice by refusing to let anyone with first-hand knowledge comply with a legal Congressional subpoena. We might all learn something.
Click to expand...
He did better than that and you still aren't happy. Do you have any idea what that document he declassified is? Serious question, do you know what it is?
 
HumblePi said:
Where's all the people who can put this to rest if they only appeared to testify? Where's Rudy and Mulvaney, how about John Bolton or Mike Pompeo. What do they have to hide?
Click to expand...

Why should anyone have to appear under oath so that National Security be placed in jeopardy Surely if the procedures of the Schitf committee did not leak like a sieve things might be different. If whistleblower Eric Ciaramella were on the up and up he'd appear to answer questions just as John Dean and other whistle blowers have done in the past. Only Obama had whistle blowers fired and in some cases placed in jail and later released. Then there's all those Benghazi survivors and witnesses that were forced to sign NDA's keeping them from testifying to Congress. Indeed, Trump has not done the same to silence those spewing hearsay infp….

See:
Congressman: Benghazi Survivors Forced to Sign Non-Disclosure Agreements
Jul 18, 2013 · "On Tuesday I raised the question of why none of the Benghazi survivors, whether State Department, CIA, or private security contract employees have testified publicly before Congress. "According to trusted sources that have contacted my office, many if not all of the survivors of the Benghazi attacks along with others at the Department of Defense, the CIA have been asked or directed to sign additional non-disclosure agreements about their involvement in the Benghazi attacks. Some of these new NDAs, as they call them, I have been told were signed as recently as this summer."
"If these reports are accurate, this would be a stunning revelation to any member of Congress, any member of Congress that finds this out and also more importantly to the American people. It also raises serious concerns about the priority of the administration's efforts to silence those with knowledge of the Benghazi attack in response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom