New DOJ Letter Reveals Just How Massive John Durham’s Spygate Investigation Really Is

New DOJ Letter Reveals Just How Massive John Durham’s Spygate Investigation Really Is​

New DOJ Letter Reveals Just How Massive John Durham's Spygate Investigation Really Is
Jun 10, 2019 ~ by Cristina Laila
A new letter from the Justice Department addressed to Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) reveals John Durham’s investigation into Spygate is much larger than previously known. AG Barr’s review of the FISA abuses and surveillance against Trump’s campaign is “broad in scope and multifaceted,” according to the DOJ letter. The letter to Nadler, penned by Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, indicates Fusion GPS, foreign intelligence services and non-governmental organizations and individuals are all a target of US Attorney John Durham’s investigation into the origins of Spygate.
“The Review is broad in scope and multifaceted, and is intended to illuminate open questions regarding the activities of U.S. and foreign intelligence services as well as non-governmental organizations and individuals,” Boyd wrote.



~~~~~~
It appears that there are an enormous amounts of "Depends" being bought up in DC lately. I suspect Hillary's campaign may be under investigation for laundering money and campaign violations with how they funneled money to Fusion GPS through Perkins-Coie. Of course money laundering, paying foreign spies, obstructing justice, destruction of evidence, and lying to Congress is only illegal if a Republican do it. I want these bastards rotting in prison! But this crime began in 2016, and it is still being discovered today.
I want to see convictions, well at least indictments handed out by October of this year and I want the truth to come out. I believe that Durham, Barr, and (I.G.) Horowitz are seriously pursuing these goals. I want these bastards rotting in prison! But this crime began in 2016, and it is still being discovered today.
I want convictions, and I want the truth to come out. I believe that Durham, Barr, and (I.G.) Horowitz are seriously pursuing these goals. Hmmm...., Whatever happened to Huber? Huber? Huber? If this plays out the way I think it will, the public will be shocked at some of the players. Again, I'm content to wait for now.
No wonder Nadler is hot and bothered. After Durham gets done and outs the criminals there won't be another Democrat elected to office for 20 years. Buh-Bye Nadler. 2020 is coming with a quickness...
There WILL be accountability for them ALL, including Obama, and the MSM, it simply MUST happen. Tick Tock, the show is about to start, have you stocked up on popcorn and Jim Beam like me? You are going to NEED it. This is HISTORY, relish it and teach your children so that it NEVER repeats.

Doc91478 said:

New DOJ Letter Reveals Just How Massive John Durham’s Spygate Investigation Really Is
~~~~~~
I suspect Hillary's campaign may be under investigation for laundering money and campaign violations with how they funneled money to Fusion GPS through Perkins-Coie.
I want to see convictions, well at least indictments handed out by October of this year...
I believe that Durham, Barr, and (I.G.) Horowitz are seriously pursuing these goals.
I want convictions...
I believe that Durham, Barr, and (I.G.) Horowitz are seriously pursuing these goals.
After Durham gets done and outs the criminals there won't be another Democrat elected to office for 20 years.
There WILL be accountability for them ALL, including Obama, and the MSM, it simply MUST happen.

Click to expand...

I foresee disappointment in your future.

This is not a criminal investigation which will unearth new things.
It's a review of the procedures which were applied etc.

Simon W. Moon said:

I foresee disappointment in your future.

This is not a criminal investigation which will unearth new things.
It's a review of the procedures which were applied etc.

Click to expand...

... or which procedures were not applied.
Or as AG Barr likes to say, not properly predicated.
Those would be new things.

bubbabgone said:

... or which procedures were not applied.
Or as AG Barr likes to say, not properly predicated.
Those would be new things.

Click to expand...

All he has to do is read the report. The predicate for the investigation is in there, and there's no credible evidence it wasn't 'proper'.

bubbabgone said:

... or which procedures were not applied.
Or as AG Barr likes to say, not properly predicated.
Those would be new things.

Click to expand...

They would be things which were revealed by the existing records and recollections.

Simon W. Moon said:

They would be things which were revealed by the existing records and recollections.

Click to expand...

Well that certainly depends on how accurate the existing records have been ... or put another way, new records that put the lie to old records or new records that confirm old suspicions.

Tanngrisnir said:

All he has to do is read the report. The predicate for the investigation is in there, and there's no credible evidence it wasn't 'proper'.

Click to expand...

Flip that around. There is no credible evidence supporting the stated predicate and there should be. Instead there are multiple conflicting stories and timelines. Hence a US Attorney to untangle the predicate.

Another delusional drive-by, the mind if a trunpling on full display.....

Jay59 said:

Flip that around. There is no credible evidence supporting the stated predicate and there should be. Instead there are multiple conflicting stories and timelines. Hence a US Attorney to untangle the predicate.

Click to expand...

Yes, it's actually cited in the report. You haven't read it. You wouldn't know. There aren't mulitple conflicting stories.

Stawp. Dear Dog, just stawp.

Tanngrisnir said:

Yes, it's actually cited in the report. You haven't read it. You wouldn't know. There aren't mulitple conflicting stories.
Stawp. Dear Dog, just stawp.

Click to expand...

Exactly what are you claiming was in the report? Taken literally your post states that the report cites multiple conflicting and unresolved stories.

J

Jay59 said:

Exactly what are you claiming was in the report? Taken literally your post states that the report cites multiple conflicting and unresolved stories.

J

Click to expand...

Why do you live in pathological fear of reading the report?

Tanngrisnir said:

Why do you live in pathological fear of reading the report?

Click to expand...

Why do you make up things like this? It was a simple question and you dodged it.

The Mueller report does not contain an adequate basis for beginning the investigation and it should. What is stated in the report traces the predicate to a period from late spring to mid summer 2016. Crossfire Hurricane was launched on 31 July 2016. However, the timeline falls apart on close examination. There are conflicting claims from the various agencies. Australian and English sources have not backed up some of the details. Steele, whose work is central to all this, has disavowed the veracity of the dossier.

If you want my opinion, that is a different conversation. These are just facts. If you want to cite specific points, cite them. Until then, I will take a negative report to be a negative report.

Jay59 said:

Why do you make up things like this? It was a simple question and you dodged it.

The Mueller report does not contain an adequate basis for beginning the investigation and it should. What is stated in the report traces the predicate to a period from late spring to mid summer 2016. Crossfire Hurricane was launched on 31 July 2016. However, the timeline falls apart on close examination. There are conflicting claims from the various agencies. Australian and English sources have not backed up some of the details. Steele, whose work is central to all this, has disavowed the veracity of the dossier.

If you want my opinion, that is a different conversation. These are just facts. If you want to cite specific points, cite them. Until then, I will take a negative report to be a negative report.

Click to expand...

The Mueller report actually does contain an adequate basis for investigations. No timeline falls apart, nor can you demonstrate that it does.

You haven't read it. You fear reading it.

Sad that you live in such fear, but it's simply not my problem.

Tanngrisnir said:

The Mueller report actually does contain an adequate basis for investigations. No timeline falls apart, nor can you demonstrate that it does. You haven't read it. You fear reading it. Sad that you live in such fear, but it's simply not my problem.

Click to expand...

Sad that you do not cite facts and choose ad hominem attacks instead. You claim there is an adequate basis so cite it. Give page numbers and quotes. It's standard academic procedure.

Jay59 said:

Sad that you do not cite facts and choose ad hominem attacks instead. You claim there is an adequate basis so cite it. Give page numbers and quotes. It's standard academic procedure.

Click to expand...

Sad that you'd be compelled to lie about ad homs and haven't read the report, but try and pretend that you have.

You're not really very good at this.