• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney

sangha said:
In Mueller and the SDNYs sentencing statement, which you obviously did not read


Try reading what the dictionary says
Click to expand...


I said "Cohen pled guilty even though the particulars had never been adjudicated as a crime."
"Adjudication is the legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation, including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties or litigants to come to a decision which determines rights and obligations between the parties involved."

So you're mistaken. What did you think it meant?

Sooooo what was the corroboration?
 
bubbabgone said:
I said "Cohen pled guilty even though the particulars had never been adjudicated as a crime."
"Adjudication is the legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation, including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties or litigants to come to a decision which determines rights and obligations between the parties involved."

So you're mistaken. What did you think it meant?

Sooooo what was the corroboration?
Click to expand...

And a judge HAS reviewed the evidence and argumentation.
 
sangha said:
And a judge HAS reviewed the evidence and argumentation.
Click to expand...

No he didn't. He accepted the plea. There were no defense arguments offered.
Now I see why you're confused.
 
bubbabgone said:
No he didn't. He accepted the plea. There were no defense arguments offered.
Now I see why you're confused.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he just accepted it without any review:roll:

You really dont know anything about how courts work, do you?
 
sangha said:
Yeah, he just accepted it without any review:roll:

You really dont know anything about how courts work, do you?
Click to expand...
I asked you a couple of times but you couldn't tell us what was offered as corroboration of Trump's guilt for the campaign finance charge.
Here's your chance for redemption of sorts.
Tell us how the Cohen plea hearing before the Judge went and we're especially interested to hear what his defense lawyer offered the Judge as evidence of Cohen's innocence at the plea hearing.
This oughta be good. Go.
 
bubbabgone said:
I asked you a couple of times but you couldn't tell us what was offered as corroboration of Trump's guilt for the campaign finance charge.
Here's your chance for redemption of sorts.
Tell us how the Cohen plea hearing before the Judge went and we're especially interested to hear what his defense lawyer offered the Judge as evidence of Cohen's innocence at the plea hearing.
This oughta be good. Go.
Click to expand...

Try reading the sentencing statement.
 
sangha said:
Try reading the sentencing statement.
Click to expand...

You're dodging again.
Tell us how the Cohen plea hearing before the Judge went and we're especially interested to hear what his defense lawyer offered the Judge as evidence of Cohen's innocence at the plea hearing.
 
bubbabgone said:
You're dodging again.
Tell us how the Cohen plea hearing before the Judge went
Click to expand...
Try reading.
and we're especially interested to hear what his defense lawyer offered the Judge as evidence of Cohen's innocence at the plea hearing.
Click to expand...
The defendant had already entered his plea and his defense lawyer entered a sentencing statement arguing for no jail time. They did not offer ANY evidence of inncence because Cohen was pleading guilty

You would know this if you had just read the info available. And if you realized that defendants dont argue innocence while pleading guilty
 
sangha said:
And a judge HAS reviewed the evidence and argumentation.
Click to expand...

bubbabgone said:
No he didn't. He accepted the plea. There were no defense arguments offered.
Now I see why you're confused.
Click to expand...

sangha said:
Yeah, he just accepted it without any review:roll:

You really dont know anything about how courts work, do you?
Click to expand...

sangha said:
Try reading.

The defendant had already entered his plea and his defense lawyer entered a sentencing statement arguing for no jail time. They did not offer ANY evidence of inncence because Cohen was pleading guilty
You would know this if you had just read the info available. And if you realized that defendants dont argue innocence while pleading guilty
Click to expand...

Yeah. They don't argue innocence while pleading guilty. That's why I said they don't. Doesn't explain why you said the "judge HAS reviewed the evidence and argumentation".
That was wrong.
I think you finally did a bit of reading about the plea hearing and realized how wrong you've been and now you're trying to moonwalk away.
Better late than never. Fine by me.
 
At this point if the Manhattan US Attorney doesn't try to indict Trump, Mueller might.

“You can’t steal the presidency and hold up the presidency as a shield against being held accountable for stealing the presidency.”
Click to expand...
Glenn Kirschner - former assistant U.S. Attorney
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom