• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Media Hides Laughable Turnout For Obama’s Nevada Speech

D

Doc91478

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
790
Location
North East
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
"Media Hides Laughable Turnout For Obama’s Nevada Speech While Trump/Cruz Rally Saw Thousands In Attendance" ​
​


https://www.redstate.com/brandon_mo...lly-saw-thousands-attendance/#disqus-comments
The media has tricks it can use to make it seem like a Democrat has far more support than he or she actually does, and proof has recently surfaced to show just how true that is.... Former President Barack Obama’s recent speech that attacked Republicans and the President — though he never mentioned Donald Trump by name — was widely covered by the media, seemed like it was a must-see/must-attend event for Democratic Rep. Jacky Rosen, currently struggling against incumbent Republican Sen. Dean Heller.... By the media’s account, Obama was surrounded by energized Democrats and enthusiastic voters. The bleachers behind him were packed to the brim, and the people in front were numerous.... Or were they?
According to some cell phone footage, the media’s packed house was a camera trick. The house wasn’t as packed as they’d have you believe. In fact, for it being a speech featuring the left’s golden boy, it seemed pretty sparse with a ton of empty seats where the media’s cameras weren’t going to focus.... As you can see, much of the back room is empty, only dotted with reporters with cameras. The floor before Obama seems to have a few dozen people watching... Now compare that to the bleachers behind Obama, where the media’s cameras were pointing in this next clip.

~~~~~~
This is why Dems have to bring in millions of third world illegal aliens, The Progressive Marxist Socialist Democrats have lost working class Americans.
Probably the most important thing those fired up could do would be to brag about the advantages of voting early and encourage everyone you know, especially the professional fence sitters, to go out now and vote while the memories of the Democrats' moral turpitude is still fresh in the nation's awareness. That alone would probably be worth many more points for our side. While Obama's replicate Hillary's lack of crowds. I think we will be pleasantly surprised about the snow job the press, and those Nate Silvers of the statistic polling industry are trying to tell us.
 
This just in - ex-presidents draw smaller crowds than the current POTUS does.
 
I saw those short video clips on several twitter accounts today ... :lol:

They are hilarious ... for optics, they placed 300 people behind Obama while Obama himself addressed a group of 150. :lamo
 
Doc91478 said:
"Media Hides Laughable Turnout For Obama’s Nevada Speech While Trump/Cruz Rally Saw Thousands In Attendance" ​
​


https://www.redstate.com/brandon_mo...lly-saw-thousands-attendance/#disqus-comments
The media has tricks it can use to make it seem like a Democrat has far more support than he or she actually does, and proof has recently surfaced to show just how true that is.... Former President Barack Obama’s recent speech that attacked Republicans and the President — though he never mentioned Donald Trump by name — was widely covered by the media, seemed like it was a must-see/must-attend event for Democratic Rep. Jacky Rosen, currently struggling against incumbent Republican Sen. Dean Heller.... By the media’s account, Obama was surrounded by energized Democrats and enthusiastic voters. The bleachers behind him were packed to the brim, and the people in front were numerous.... Or were they?
According to some cell phone footage, the media’s packed house was a camera trick. The house wasn’t as packed as they’d have you believe. In fact, for it being a speech featuring the left’s golden boy, it seemed pretty sparse with a ton of empty seats where the media’s cameras weren’t going to focus.... As you can see, much of the back room is empty, only dotted with reporters with cameras. The floor before Obama seems to have a few dozen people watching... Now compare that to the bleachers behind Obama, where the media’s cameras were pointing in this next clip.

~~~~~~
This is why Dems have to bring in millions of third world illegal aliens, The Progressive Marxist Socialist Democrats have lost working class Americans.
Probably the most important thing those fired up could do would be to brag about the advantages of voting early and encourage everyone you know, especially the professional fence sitters, to go out now and vote while the memories of the Democrats' moral turpitude is still fresh in the nation's awareness. That alone would probably be worth many more points for our side. While Obama's replicate Hillary's lack of crowds. I think we will be pleasantly surprised about the snow job the press, and those Nate Silvers of the statistic polling industry are trying to tell us.
Click to expand...

450 isn't a bad turnout for Obama in a state as red as Nevada, especially considering that Obama is no longer a president or a candidate. I wonder how Trump would do in California or New York City, or D.C. where hardly anybody showed up for his inauguration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom