First of all, blaming "both sides!!" is to place no actual blame at all.
Case in point - "Rightfully so," but you've never called him out that I've seen, and are defending his crap memo even now and how he ran the committee even now. He's the Chair, so it was Nunes, and not Schiff, who made the inquiry nakedly partisan starting with his "midnight run" and continued it through and including the memo, the final report, and the investigation itself when Democratic members were treated as if they weren't even on the committee, excluded from drafting or input into drafting any of the reports put out by the committee. Saying Schiff had no power is actually incredibly significant and damning because it puts the blame where it belongs on the Chair, which you just cannot do.
BTW, nice dodge on the Yahoo article. It does in fact matter how it was used, and Nunes and you argued it was used to confirm Steele, but it wasn't, as we know, so you moved the goal posts to "sloppy work." Nunes' memo misstated the purpose, Schiff's didn't, but "both sides!!!" because being accurate and "partisan" is the same as being intentionally misleading (aka lying) and "partisan," apparently. Same thing with the other claim by Nunes that the political origins weren't disclosed (they were - to "discredit" Trump's campaign) and the Nunes memo claim that the FBI hid that they paid Steele, which was also disclosed in the FISA warrant.
So, the Nunes memo was almost breathtakingly misleading on nearly all the supposedly scandalous claims, and it was drafted entirely by the GOP members with no opportunity for Democrats or the FBI and DoJ to weigh in on the charges, but Both Sides!!