• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Coming Collusion Bloodbath

Sure it will, just like "Hillary will be indicted any day now" was the battle cry for the right for over 3 years. You guys have a Republican house, Republican senate and a Republican who has stacked the DoJ and other cabinet positions with other Republicans and you guys STILL can't find **** on Hillary to indict her. Wow man, that's pretty pathetic, but yeah any day now huh? :lamo



Well let's be truthful, they have tried to convict Hillary of something anything since she was the first lady. She is probably the most investigated for woman in history and try as the right has they have never been able to prove a single one of their conspiracies.

I do not think I would like Hilary as a person if I met her, just like I think I would really like Sara Palin if I met her, however Hilary was unarguably the most qualified person to ever run for president, and our country would be in a far better place right now if she had won.



America was the world's most powerful country my entire life, and in just over a year I have watched us go from first to third, all because of one con artist.

I sure hope we can bring back the traditional tar and feathering and ride this crook out on a rail and give our country back to Americans.
 
You do realize that McCabe, Comey, Mueller are all Republicans who were in the FBI long before Obama, right???

No, they are all establishment Republicans that are out to get Trump. That is the excuse they used. All the world is against Trump, boo hoo hoo. This poor moral man who cheated with a Porn Star and cheated on ALL his wives is just abused.
 
This summary at the end of your article is something I have been arguing for quite some time, as each new fact comes to light about the election:

...

Succinct and to the point...but it will go in one ear and out the other of all those who prefer to seek any justification for the psychic shock of losing an election they thought was in the bag.

To them, the only way their candidate could have lost the election would have to be caused by cheating with Russians on the part of the victor and his team, while ignoring all the actual collusion/cheating that is becoming more and more apparent via the prior administration and the DNC on behalf of the loser of that election.

That is the main problem we have with the MSM: they no longer debate the reason but rather how the reason was delivered,
as evident in the recent event: the reason for McCabe's firing is ignored, the timing of the firing is the main subject.
 
That is the main problem we have with the MSM: they no longer debate the reason but rather how the reason was delivered,
as evident in the recent event: the reason for McCabe's firing is ignored, the timing of the firing is the main subject.

Of course the timing is discussed. The infraction that McCabe did was in 2016 and the president just looks petty now. It wasn't such a bad infraction to fire him then, but it is bad enough to fire him 2 days before retirement?
 
" Obama's clean "....:lamo :lamo.

Literally no one believes that


He's not, really?

Okay prove it show even just a parking ticket he has received.

Trump has been taken to court over four thousand times.

Obama???

Any history of Obama stealing wages and not paying contractors?

Any history of using bankruptcy to not pay his hard working taxpaying employees?

How bout trump?

Please, no one is perfect but will get zero traction trying to compare Obama to trump.
 
No, they are all establishment Republicans that are out to get Trump. That is the excuse they used. All the world is against Trump, boo hoo hoo. This poor moral man who cheated with a Porn Star and cheated on ALL his wives is just abused.

What I'm getting out of this is that they want people to say no to investigations about people they like.
 
That is the main problem we have with the MSM: they no longer debate the reason but rather how the reason was delivered,
as evident in the recent event: the reason for McCabe's firing is ignored, the timing of the firing is the main subject.

No, no Barnacle, you cannot have it both ways.

Trump has ensured that he is in the media 24/7 with his corrupt, abusive, and incompetent antics. He overshadows everyone and normally people cheer that, it's part of why they voted for him. He's the loudest bully in the room. Now suddenly you're upset that what is really an internal workplace disciplinary IG report, isn't front page national news next to the deplorable Trump White House?

That's not MSM's fault, and you know it, it's all Trump.

Besides, Fox news runs pro Trump nonsense all day, we assume you get your news from that anyway.
 
Of course the timing is discussed. The infraction that McCabe did was in 2016 and the president just looks petty now. It wasn't such a bad infraction to fire him then, but it is bad enough to fire him 2 days before retirement?

Nonsense; the FBI's OPR requested his firing. They knew what they were doing, and all they had to do was "hold out" a little longer and their findings would have been submitted after McCabe started his "retirement" ... had they wished to "protect" McCabe.

But they didn't wish to.

BTW ...

Assistant Director of the FBI's OPR: Candice M. Will - appointed by Robert S. Mueller, III
 
Nonsense; the FBI's OPR requested his firing. They knew what they were doing, and all they had to do was "hold out" a little longer and their findings would have been submitted after McCabe started his "retirement" ... had they wished to "protect" McCabe.

But they didn't wish to.

BTW ...

Assistant Director of the FBI's OPR: Candice M. Will - appointed by Robert S. Mueller, III

Yes, they requested his firing, how long ago? That could have been done long ago, but Trump waited so he could punish McCabe personally. So yeah, Trump just went petty because McCabe dare to speak something Trump didn't like. Pathetic, but then you guys support it because Trump did it.
 
No, no Barnacle, you cannot have it both ways.

Trump has ensured that he is in the media 24/7 with his corrupt, abusive, and incompetent antics. He overshadows everyone and normally people cheer that, it's part of why they voted for him. He's the loudest bully in the room. Now suddenly you're upset that what is really an internal workplace disciplinary IG report, isn't front page national news next to the deplorable Trump White House?

That's not MSM's fault, and you know it, it's all Trump.

Besides, Fox news runs pro Trump nonsense all day, we assume you get your news from that anyway.

You got a few things mixed up, but that is okay.

Trump is in the news 24/7 because the MSM has a love/hate relationship with him. :lol:
They hate him because he won the presidency and their darling - the worn-out, lying and corrupt hag - had lost.
They love him because he is so transparent and open by giving them daily info that they can twist and misconstrue into negative headlines. (grin)

https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/study-90-networks-trump-coverage-negative-2017

BTW, Fox News coverage is only 35 - 40% positive on Trump.
After Fox & Friends in the morning, you can turn off Fox News until the evening. The day-time coverage is mostly anti-Trump.
 
Yes, they requested his firing, how long ago? That could have been done long ago, but Trump waited so he could punish McCabe personally. So yeah, Trump just went petty because McCabe dare to speak something Trump didn't like. Pathetic, but then you guys support it because Trump did it.

Don't know; you tell me. When did the FBI's OPR submit their final findings and their request to fire McCabe to Sessions?
 
Yet again, Hillary is so guilty that with a Republican house, Republican senate, Republiacn president who has put Republicans in charge have been able to find NOTHING to actually indict Hillary with.

I'll continue to mention Hillary because it proves either of the following:

#1. She didn't do anything to get indicted for and Republicans are still butt hurt about it.
#2. Trump is so incompetent that his cabinet picks are also incompetent to indict Hillary on such "slam dunk" evidence. :lamo

Take your poison as to which is correct :lamo

The only reason Hillary wasn't indicted 2 years ago...when there was a Democratic President...is because that President and his administration was corrupt. You remember Comey, right?

But hey...I know you don't want to talk about Obama and his people. That's why you are deflecting with your whataboutism.

Moving on...
 
You do realize that McCabe, Comey, Mueller are all Republicans who were in the FBI long before Obama, right???

Do you think Republicans cannot be corrupt? Especially when they are hired by corrupt Democrats or people who are associated with corrupt Democrats?

McCabe, Comey and Mueller all worked for Obama.
 
Do you think Republicans cannot be corrupt? Especially when they are hired by corrupt Democrats or people who are associated with corrupt Democrats?

McCabe, Comey and Mueller all worked for Obama.

They were all hired by Bush at least ten years before Obama...

Also Trump gave money to the Clinton Foundation, by your definition, Trump is corrupt.
 
They were all hired by Bush at least ten years before Obama...

Also Trump gave money to the Clinton Foundation, by your definition, Trump is corrupt.

They all went to college. Does that mean all college people are okay? Of course not. But look at their actions. Look at their records. Look at the evidence. Corruption from all of them...including Mueller.

When have I ever given a definition that anyone who gave money to the Clinton Foundation is corrupt? Answer: Never. Why are you making **** up?
 
The only reason Hillary wasn't indicted 2 years ago...when there was a Democratic President...is because that President and his administration was corrupt. You remember Comey, right?

But hey...I know you don't want to talk about Obama and his people. That's why you are deflecting with your whataboutism.

Moving on...

and using your reasoning, it's been over a year now and Republicans haven't done squat to a so called "slam-dunk" indictment against Hillary. Why? And don't use "Deep State" nonsense, if Trump hires the BEST of the BEST as he claims, it shouldn't be an issue.

so your conspiracy nonsense is just that, nonsense.
 
The only reason Hillary wasn't indicted 2 years ago...when there was a Democratic President...is because that President and his administration was corrupt. You remember Comey, right?

But hey...I know you don't want to talk about Obama and his people. That's why you are deflecting with your whataboutism.

Moving on...

Do you think the first order of business should be to get to the bottom of Obamas birth certificate eh Mycroft? :lamo
 
and using your reasoning, it's been over a year now and Republicans haven't done squat to a so called "slam-dunk" indictment against Hillary. Why? And don't use "Deep State" nonsense, if Trump hires the BEST of the BEST as he claims, it shouldn't be an issue.

so your conspiracy nonsense is just that, nonsense.

So Andrew McCabe, James Comey, Peter Sztrok, Bruce Ohr and James Baker should all be given their jobs back ?

I mean of its just all " conspiracy nonsense, right ?
 
They all went to college. Does that mean all college people are okay? Why are you making **** up?

I could ask you the same thing.

I would assume that giving buckets of money to a supposedly corrupt foundation is just as bad if not worse than supposedly getting hired by the person who runs said corrupt foundation. No?

I have looked at their records, they have all served three different presidents honorably. The only thing that's changed in their tenure is that Trump became President. They are not sacrificing their careers/pensions for him. He is the one that is destroying their reputations, pensions, and careers.
 
Last edited:
So Andrew McCabe, James Comey, Peter Sztrok, Bruce Ohr and James Baker should all be given their jobs back ?

I mean of its just all " conspiracy nonsense, right ?

I don't give a **** about the people you mentioned, they have ZERO bearing to what I said.

if Hillary is such a slam dunk at indicting her please explain how you have a Republican senate, Republican house, Republican President boasting that he hires the BEST of the BEST placing Republicans in the DoJ that cannot do their job to indict a sure thing against Hillary?
 
and using your reasoning, it's been over a year now and Republicans haven't done squat to a so called "slam-dunk" indictment against Hillary. Why? And don't use "Deep State" nonsense, if Trump hires the BEST of the BEST as he claims, it shouldn't be an issue.

so your conspiracy nonsense is just that, nonsense.

What makes you think they "haven't done squat"? Oh...wait...the pro-Hillary, anti-Trump Mainstream Media hasn't told you they've done squat.

You know...I'm thinking the meaning of "Deep State" is lost on you. Just saying...
 
Do you think the first order of business should be to get to the bottom of Obamas birth certificate eh Mycroft? :lamo

??? Wasn't that settled like, five years ago? Maybe it's still on YOUR mind, eh?
 
I could ask you the same thing.

I would assume that giving buckets of money to a supposedly corrupt foundation is just as bad if not worse than supposedly getting hired by the person who runs said corrupt foundation. No?

I have looked at their records, they have all served three different presidents honorably. The only thing that's changed in their tenure is that Trump became President. They are not sacrificing their careers/pensions for him. He is the one that is destroying their reputations, pensions, and careers.

This thread isn't about Clinton. :mrgreen:
 
I could ask you the same thing.

Well, you COULD ask...if you didn't dishonestly edit my post. I guess you just didn't like the fact that I answered your question before you asked it. Oh, well...

I would assume that giving buckets of money to a supposedly corrupt foundation is just as bad if not worse than supposedly getting hired by the person who runs said corrupt foundation. No?

Now see...that's the difference between you and me. You assume. I don't. So...no.

I have looked at their records, they have all served three different presidents honorably. The only thing that's changed in their tenure is that Trump became President. They are not sacrificing their careers/pensions for him. He is the one that is destroying their reputations, pensions, and careers.

"honorably"??? LOL!!

You'd better look again. All three of them have been in bed with the Clintons for years.
 
Back
Top Bottom