• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Shamed FBI reopens the case against Hillary Clinton...

I'm going to stop you there.

Trump promised in the campaign, on health care, that no one will lose coverage. There will be insurance for everybody. Healthcare will be a “lot less expensive” for everyone — the government, consumers, providers. What he did was try to throw 23 million people off of health insurance and the rest would pay much higher premiums.

Trump also said “I’m not going to cut Social Security like every other Republican and I’m not going to cut Medicare or Medicaid,” but now is conspiring with other Republicans to slash both programs.

Trump promised “The wealthy are not getting a tax cut under our plan,” but that exactly the group that benefits most from his tax plan and in a few years the middle class will end up with higher taxes than they started.

You can't. No one can.

I would like you to reread that quote and notice the word "tried"

Does Trump or Congress craft legislation?

Again, Trump or Congress?

Thrice?

In addition to my question for the last statement, I would like to see the analysis of where you came to that conclusion. Please.
 
So if the current investigation goes nowhere you will conclude that she is innocent of wrongdoing or that the evidence isn't strong enough to determine guilt? Not trying to spam you with questions, I just want to be sure I understand you.

That's what I said. But, what would it matter? If the investigation goes nowhere, what would anything I say make any difference about anything? In fact, what difference would it make to anyone or anything if the investigation goes nowhere? A finished investigation is a finished investigation. Personally, I think both all of the Hillary and the Trump stuff is all total nonsense and it should all be dropped and everyone should get back to running the country.
 
Being that this has already been investigated, what New information was present to warrant another investigation?
If she is guilty of something then she should be prosecuted, that goes for any politician, including trump but alas he always has the Pardon Parachute to cover his arse.

Actually it never was investigated by the FBI or the Justice Dept under the Obama Bin Laden administration. All they held was an attempted exoneration.
 
Hillary should be tried,convicted and executed
 
That's what I said. But, what would it matter? If the investigation goes nowhere, what would anything I say make any difference about anything? In fact, what difference would it make to anyone or anything if the investigation goes nowhere? A finished investigation is a finished investigation. Personally, I think both all of the Hillary and the Trump stuff is all total nonsense and it should all be dropped and everyone should get back to running the country.

Okay, but Clinton had her investigation. Actually, she's had a whole lot of them. Trump will get his, and whatever Mueller's conclusions, that will be that.

Hillary should be tried,convicted and executed

Thank you for your opinion, comrade.
 
Hillary should be tried,convicted and executed
That's what dictators, tyrants and authoritarians do. In democracies, people get convicted for violating actual crimes, not because they violated the imaginary crime of being a political opponent.

The reality, of course, is that Hillary was investigated endlessly by a hostile Congress, who no matter how hard they tried, couldn't find a chargeable violation of law.
 
Okay, but Clinton had her investigation. Actually, she's had a whole lot of them. Trump will get his, and whatever Mueller's conclusions, that will be that.



Thank you for your opinion, comrade.

That opinion seems to be the conclusions of the GoP base, who are thrilled by the reopening of the witch-hunt, and hope to continue them until their desired outcome is reached, whatever the lack of evidence.
 
That's what dictators, tyrants and authoritarians do. In democracies, people get convicted for violating actual crimes, not because they violated the imaginary crime of being a political opponent.

To be fair, in his country Gulfman is used to political opponents being poisoned.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Moved to appropriate location
 
It is about time. The FBI has little credibility and has decided to do something about it.

Hillary Clinton may be the most serious criminal to ever run for public office.

We have seen the criminality of the DNC and the absolute control the Clintons had on the DNC.

The Clinton foundation was the "bank" the Clintons used to parlay their ill gotten pay for play while she was SoS.

This is so simple for all who care to look, to see that the Clinton foundation must be investigated.

Chastised FBI Closes In On Hillary! Dick Morris TV: Lunch ALERT! - YouTube

FBI revives investigation into Clinton Foundation - YouTube

DOJ, FBI investigates Clinton Foundation alleged pay-to-play politics - YouTube

5PM The Five 1/5/18 | Hillary Clinton Investigations | Fox Nation - YouTube

Time to clean up the Democrats house for them. :mrgreen:



1) FBI investigates and give any evidence, proof of a crime to the US Attorneys Office.

2) US Attorney talks with the FBI and decides if they ( US Attorney ) will prosecute & if the charges are founded, have basis, and if they can get a conviction.

3) FBI Agents write up a criminal complaint, take that to the US Magistrate.... swear under oath that the facts in the Criminal Complaint ( affidavit ) are true ; and the US Magistrate issues arrest warrant(s).

4) FBI takes Warrants and tracks down the person(s) named in the warrant ; and arrest them.



Investigate all they want. If the US Attorneys Office will not prosecute.......then the event stops before it even gets started. The investigation.........occurs ; but NO ARREST will happen unless the US Attorney gives their
blessing.

Don't get your hopes up, and Hillary Clinton, nor Bill Clinton ; and accomplices / complicit individuals -----> will not be in handcuffs until you see it in the news.




Major Lambda
 
Okay, but Clinton had her investigation. Actually, she's had a whole lot of them. Trump will get his, and whatever Mueller's conclusions, that will be that.



Thank you for your opinion, comrade.

So, everyone that does not agree with you is a comrade? Have I called you any names?
 
In other words, everyone who is not an avid member of the anti-Trump resistance is a "comrade".

Nice shifting of the goal posts there.

I have my reasons for my response to him, none of which concerns you, as can be demonstrated by the fact that the type of response I wrote for him isn't remotely similar to anything I've ever said to you. And I think it's reasonable to assume that you're not an avid member of the anti trump resistance.
 
Last edited:
Nice shifting of the goal posts there.

I have my reasons for my response to him, none of which concerns you, as can be demonstrated by the fact that the type of response I wrote for him isn't remotely similar to anything I've ever said to you. And I think it's reasonable to assume that you're not an avid member of the anti trump resistance.

You called me a comrade. No goalposts about it.
 
Why did you call me comrade?

Answer my question. Is Gulfman your sock? I'm repeating my question even though you seem to have just verified that Gulfman is indeed your sock. Either that or you are epically unaware of what's going on right now.
 
Answer my question. Is Gulfman your sock? I'm repeating my question even though you seem to have just verified that Gulfman is indeed your sock. Either that or you are epically unaware of what's going on right now.

You're trying to change the subject. Why did you call me comrade?
 
You are acting childish. No wonder you called me comrade. You aren't capable of either honest or quality posting. I'm done with with you.

You're making a fool out of yourself, and if you went back and re-read post #180 a litttllle more slowly you would understand why. At first you gave the impression that you're either terrible at reading comprehension or that you've created a sock puppet. Now it's both of those things and that you're too lazy to go back to see what I'm even talking about. Your next post will determine if it's all three and an in inability to admit you messed up.

I doubt you really made a sock puppet, but you've managed to take an extraordinarily small and innocent mistake and slowly build it up into a giant, stupid one, and it could have been avoided if you had just stopped acting so combative for five seconds of your life.
 
Back
Top Bottom