• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How the democrats set up puerto rico for disaster

WCH

WCH

Believer
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
31,009
Reaction score
9,029
Location
The Lone Star State.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
How the Democrats Set Up Puerto Rico for Disaster | Frontpage Mag

We’ve seen this show before.

When there’s a national disaster, neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, shelters are filled with crying families, and a Republican is in the White House, the Democrats jump into action.

Not to help, but to make political capital from a disaster that they helped cause.

After Hurricane Katrina, the media shrieked that survivors inside the New Orleans Superdome were murdering each other. But there actually wasn’t a single murder in the Superdome. And no, NBC’s Brian Williams, never saw any corpses floating past the Ritz-Carlton. The media exaggerated and lied.

snip...
 
WCH said:
How the Democrats Set Up Puerto Rico for Disaster | Frontpage Mag

We’ve seen this show before.

When there’s a national disaster, neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, shelters are filled with crying families, and a Republican is in the White House, the Democrats jump into action.

Not to help, but to make political capital from a disaster that they helped cause.

After Hurricane Katrina, the media shrieked that survivors inside the New Orleans Superdome were murdering each other. But there actually wasn’t a single murder in the Superdome. And no, NBC’s Brian Williams, never saw any corpses floating past the Ritz-Carlton. The media exaggerated and lied.

snip...
Click to expand...

What you described was the media, not democrats. And no, they are not one in the same.
 
Praxas said:
What you described was the media, not democrats. And no, they are not one in the same.
Click to expand...

It's true. They're not the same. Ones the employER, while the other is the employEE.
 
KevinKohler said:
It's true. They're not the same. Ones the employER, while the other is the employEE.
Click to expand...

Cute, but again wrong. The media is not the Democrats. Posting intellectually dishonest comments like yours and WCH doesn't change that.
 
WCH said:
You want to prove that? Listening...
Click to expand...

Prove that the media isn't Democrats? Really? Ok, where and when are the media getting their orders on what to report from the DNC? There are many media outlets, so your claim that they are ALL democrats is going to be interesting for you to prove.
 
Praxas said:
Prove that the media isn't Democrats? Really? Ok, where and when are the media getting their orders on what to report from the DNC? There are many media outlets, so your claim that they are ALL democrats is going to be interesting for you to prove.
Click to expand...

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11409

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09...ls-clinton-campaigns-cozy-press-relationship/


On the other hand, once Trump kicked Hillary to the curb on election day, I suppose is possible that all these guys decided to go back to neutral journalistic standards. (yeah...right...)
 
Mycroft said:
On the other hand, once Trump kicked Hillary to the curb on election day, I suppose is possible that all these guys decided to go back to neutral journalistic standards. (yeah...right...)
Click to expand...

so that proves ALL the media is democrats? Of course not. The claim was made that the media is democrats. BTW that was ONE candidate. If they were democrat that would have happened to ALL candidates everywhere. Nowhere have you or anyone else proven that claim.

What you have shown is there is bias towards ONE candidate, but again that doesn't make someone a democrat.
 
Praxas said:
so that proves ALL the media is democrats? Of course not. The claim was made that the media is democrats. BTW that was ONE candidate. If they were democrat that would have happened to ALL candidates everywhere. Nowhere have you or anyone else proven that claim.

What you have shown is there is bias towards ONE candidate, but again that doesn't make someone a democrat.
Click to expand...

They can call themselves anything they want...just like people here on DP post their leans.

I go by their actions.
 
Mycroft said:
They can call themselves anything they want...just like people here on DP post their leans.

I go by their actions.
Click to expand...

Then you go by your opinion and your opinion is subjective and unproven, not fact.
 
Praxas said:
Then you go by your opinion and your opinion is subjective and unproven, not fact.
Click to expand...

I said...I go by their actions.

I've already shown how media journalists...from the whole spectrum...colluded with the Clinton campaign. We've seen their actions in print, on the airwaves and the internet. We've seen direct collusion as is the case of Brasille and others.

None of that is "opinion". It is all fact.
 
Mycroft said:
I said...I go by their actions.

I've already shown how media journalists...from the whole spectrum...colluded with the Clinton campaign. We've seen their actions in print, on the airwaves and the internet. We've seen direct collusion as is the case of Brasille and others.

None of that is "opinion". It is all fact.
Click to expand...

Fact of bias for ONE candidate, but not fact the media is democrats. Keep stretching, you're still no where near supporting your idiotic claim. Such intellectual dishonesty in your comments. Show some integrity in your comments, you're comments are just partisan garbage.
 
Praxas said:
Fact of bias for ONE candidate, but not fact the media is democrats. Keep stretching, you're still no where near supporting your idiotic claim. Such intellectual dishonesty in your comments. Show some integrity in your comments, you're comments are just partisan garbage.
Click to expand...


As I said...it doesn't matter what label they put upon themselves. Look at their actions. Those are the facts.

But hey...you can keep dithering about "they aren't democrats" all you want. If they were honest, they'd CALL themselves democrats...based on their actions.

btw, it's not just "ONE candidate". We've seen their actions in respect to Democrats vs Republicans since the Bush days...and especially after Trump kicked 16 Republicans and "ONE" Democrat to the curb.
 
Huh...I honestly believed this was going to be about voter turnout in the last election. ;)
 
WCH said:
How the Democrats Set Up Puerto Rico for Disaster | Frontpage Mag

We’ve seen this show before.

When there’s a national disaster, neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, shelters are filled with crying families, and a Republican is in the White House, the Democrats jump into action.

Not to help, but to make political capital from a disaster that they helped cause.

After Hurricane Katrina, the media shrieked that survivors inside the New Orleans Superdome were murdering each other. But there actually wasn’t a single murder in the Superdome. And no, NBC’s Brian Williams, never saw any corpses floating past the Ritz-Carlton. The media exaggerated and lied.

snip...
Click to expand...

FrontPage Magazine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FrontPage Magazine
Fpm index logo2.png
Format Online
Owner(s) David Horowitz Freedom Center
Editor-in-chief David Horowitz
Managing editors Jamie Glazov
Political alignment Right-wing

In 2016, the Southern Poverty Law Center listed Horowitz and Spencer as "anti-Muslim extremists".[6] Spencer called the article a "hit list".[7]

The website has been described as "right-wing",[8][9][10] "far-right",[11][12] "Islamophobic"[13] and "anti-Islam".[14]

So, who pays them to write this stuff?

The David Horowitz Freedom Center, formerly the Center for the Study of Popular Culture (CSPC), is a conservative[3][4][5] foundation founded in 1988 by political activist David Horowitz and his long-time collaborator Peter Collier. It was established with funding from groups including the John M. Olin Foundation, the Bradley Foundation and the Scaife Foundation. It runs several websites and blogs, including FrontPage Magazine, Students for Academic Freedom and Jihad Watch.

The usual billionaire trust fund babies.
 
Mycroft said:
As I said...it doesn't matter what label they put upon themselves. Look at their actions. Those are the facts.

But hey...you can keep dithering about "they aren't democrats" all you want. If they were honest, they'd CALL themselves democrats...based on their actions.

btw, it's not just "ONE candidate". We've seen their actions in respect to Democrats vs Republicans since the Bush days...and especially after Trump kicked 16 Republicans and "ONE" Democrat to the curb.
Click to expand...

Not to the extent you call it. But hey, you're free to make up your own opinions all you want, they just aren't facts. Next tell us how a cat is really a dog. :lamo BTW having the most morons on your side, isn't a plus, but hey you keep cheerleading Trump on all you want.
 
Praxas said:
Not to the extent you call it. But hey, you're free to make up your own opinions all you want, they just aren't facts. Next tell us how a cat is really a dog. :lamo BTW having the most morons on your side, isn't a plus, but hey you keep cheerleading Trump on all you want.
Click to expand...

Well. There you go.

You have no cogent argument...just, "Nuh uh!", and calling people names.

You are dismissed.
 
Praxas said:
your own article proves you wrong in the first sentence:



Your own link doesn't back up your claim and instead proves me correct. Again, you prove your comments were intellectually dishonest thank you.
Click to expand...
4to1 Dims over Repubs. Identified Indies don't tell who they vote for
 
Mycroft said:
Well. There you go.

You have no cogent argument...just, "Nuh uh!", and calling people names.

You are dismissed.
Click to expand...

You have yet to prove your point so yes, your opinion is rejected that all the media is democrats. Sorry you lost, not my fault.
 
WCH said:
4to1 Dims over Repubs. Identified Indies don't tell who they vote for
Click to expand...

And? Just because there are more Dems than Republicans still doesn't prove the claim YOU made.
 
WCH said:
How the Democrats Set Up Puerto Rico for Disaster | Frontpage Mag

We’ve seen this show before.

When there’s a national disaster, neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, shelters are filled with crying families, and a Republican is in the White House, the Democrats jump into action.

Not to help, but to make political capital from a disaster that they helped cause.

After Hurricane Katrina, the media shrieked that survivors inside the New Orleans Superdome were murdering each other. But there actually wasn’t a single murder in the Superdome. And no, NBC’s Brian Williams, never saw any corpses floating past the Ritz-Carlton. The media exaggerated and lied.

snip...
Click to expand...

What did the Democrats give Trump golf club passes or something?
 
<alt>doxygen said:
FrontPage Magazine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FrontPage Magazine
Fpm index logo2.png
Format Online
Owner(s) David Horowitz Freedom Center
Editor-in-chief David Horowitz
Managing editors Jamie Glazov
Political alignment Right-wing

In 2016, the Southern Poverty Law Center listed Horowitz and Spencer as "anti-Muslim extremists".[6] Spencer called the article a "hit list".[7]

The website has been described as "right-wing",[8][9][10] "far-right",[11][12] "Islamophobic"[13] and "anti-Islam".[14]

So, who pays them to write this stuff?

The David Horowitz Freedom Center, formerly the Center for the Study of Popular Culture (CSPC), is a conservative[3][4][5] foundation founded in 1988 by political activist David Horowitz and his long-time collaborator Peter Collier. It was established with funding from groups including the John M. Olin Foundation, the Bradley Foundation and the Scaife Foundation. It runs several websites and blogs, including FrontPage Magazine, Students for Academic Freedom and Jihad Watch.

The usual billionaire trust fund babies.
Click to expand...

Blind and Commie
 
WCH said:
Blind and Commie
Click to expand...

They are willfully ignorant tools, but they are paid well for that. I didn't know Horowitz was a commie, but I can't say I'm surprised. I guess one can become addicted to the teats of the trust fund babies. Seems disgusting to those of us who are uninitiated, though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom