• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because Rus

Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

This **** has gotten boring veeeeeery quickly.

Can the media dorks move onto something more interesting? Surely there is paint drying somewhere. That's more interesting then this conspiracy twaddle.
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

It's just some random contributor....on HuffPo no less. Let's not get over-excited.
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

As if any court would so flagrantly ignore the constitutional separation of powers as to try to undo a very clear victory in a presidential election. Judges can be impeached and removed, too, and any judge foolish enough to try such a stunt would be asking for that. The people have spoken, and if their decision makes collectivist dim bulbs pouty, that's just too damn bad.

The people HAVE spoken. You're right. They chose Hillary Clinton.
Now we wait to see what the electors who really choose the president do.

And I don't think judges concern themselves very much about being "impeached".
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

This **** has gotten boring veeeeeery quickly.

Can the media dorks move onto something more interesting? Surely there is paint drying somewhere. That's more interesting then this conspiracy twaddle.

Sure. That's clearly why you posted into this boring thread three pages in.
That's how most people respond to things they are bored by, right? :2razz:
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

the president is supposed to represent all states not just those with large population centers which was the main argument against a popular vote to begin with.

Wrong. The president represents the nation, and its citizens.
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

Wrong. The president represents the nation, and its citizens.

and you lose due to lack of reading.
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

Wrong. The president represents the nation, and its citizens.
Ummm, no.... The House of Representatives represents the citizens. The Senate represents the States. The President represents nobody. He or she is put in office by the States to be the chief executive and carry out the laws made by the first two entities mentioned.

Perhaps you missed a day in Civics 101 class.

Sent from my LG-V930 using Tapatalk
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

The people HAVE spoken. You're right. They chose Hillary Clinton.
Now we wait to see what the electors who really choose the president do.

I think most of us already know what they are going to do.

And I don't think judges concern themselves very much about being "impeached".

Any judge who dared try to overturn the results of this presidential election could expect to be impeached and removed. Whether he had been concerned about that fate would be irrelevant.
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

In 7 days the US transitions from Class to crass. Putin's Puppet will bring you back to the dark ages...the lights are already dimming.
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

1. Recounts are part of the process.

2. I seem to recall, not four scant years ago, our current president-elect screaming like a bitch about the electoral college being a travesty because Romney won the popular vote (hours before the west coast returns came in and Romney did not win the popular vote). I also recall our current president-elect claiming that he actually WON the popular vote, thanks to millions upon millions of illegal immigrants voting, the idea of which he nor anyone else can support with facts.

Yep, just "the left."

Overwhelmingly the left!! Show us the riots by the right after the last two elections....
 
Re: HuffPo Wildly Asserts Federal Courts Could ‘Install’ Clinton As President Because

Overwhelmingly the left!! Show us the riots by the right after the last two elections....

Show us the "riots" by the left in the wake of Trump's election. It's gotten to the point where any disturbance whatsoever is classified as a "riot" in order to further demonize "the left."

LA after Rodney King was a riot. A trash bin being set on fire in Seattle is not.
 
Back
Top Bottom