• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Holy Canoli. Meet Trump's Deplorable Impeachment Defense Team

Its a shame Johnny Cochrane isn't alive.Trump could use him.If The Democrats are full of it you must acquit.

Trump: "The glove fits PERFECTLY!"
 
Trump has literally put together an all star team of cretins

Starr spent some time as the president of Baylor University, a job he lost after a report demonstrated that his administration showed a fundamental failure in responding to sexual assaults, including an epidemic of cases involving players on the school's football team. Ray went on to be arrested for stalking in 2006.

Sekulow hosts a call-in radio show and has been on Trump's legal team since at least 2017, making him the longest-standing member of that team. As part of his legal defense, Sekulow got the president to approve an arrangement for the president's former lawyer, John Dowd, to represent Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump lawyer Rudy Guliani.

penning what has to be the most unhinged letter in the history of the OLC, a legal argument that basically amounted to a "witch hunt!" Cipollone's strategy, which entails refusing to comply with every single lawful subpoena the impeachment inquiry has issued for the White House, resulted in a second impeachment count against Donald Trump, obstruction of Congress

he has come under scrutiny for his work representing now-deceased serial sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. One of Epstein's accusers also accused Dershowitz of sexual assault, a charge he denies. Dershowitz has said he received a massage at Epstein's house, which was one of the bases of Epstein's trafficking, but insists he kept my underwear on during the massage


Meet Trump’s deplorable impeachment defense team.

Its really hard to pick the worst one. The stalker one is cleary the worst human there but I'm going to have to say Starr. He suddenly believes in impeachment is bad combined with the Baylor scandal. I'm surprised Weinstein didnt hire him. Wait, he can afford a good attorney.

If I'm not mistaken, I believe the team includes a liberal deplorable.
 
Trump has literally put together an all star team of cretins

Starr spent some time as the president of Baylor University, a job he lost after a report demonstrated that his administration showed a fundamental failure in responding to sexual assaults, including an epidemic of cases involving players on the school's football team. Ray went on to be arrested for stalking in 2006.

Sekulow hosts a call-in radio show and has been on Trump's legal team since at least 2017, making him the longest-standing member of that team. As part of his legal defense, Sekulow got the president to approve an arrangement for the president's former lawyer, John Dowd, to represent Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump lawyer Rudy Guliani.

penning what has to be the most unhinged letter in the history of the OLC, a legal argument that basically amounted to a "witch hunt!" Cipollone's strategy, which entails refusing to comply with every single lawful subpoena the impeachment inquiry has issued for the White House, resulted in a second impeachment count against Donald Trump, obstruction of Congress

he has come under scrutiny for his work representing now-deceased serial sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. One of Epstein's accusers also accused Dershowitz of sexual assault, a charge he denies. Dershowitz has said he received a massage at Epstein's house, which was one of the bases of Epstein's trafficking, but insists he kept my underwear on during the massage


Meet Trump’s deplorable impeachment defense team.

Its really hard to pick the worst one. The stalker one is cleary the worst human there but I'm going to have to say Starr. He suddenly believes in impeachment is bad combined with the Baylor scandal. I'm surprised Weinstein didnt hire him. Wait, he can afford a good attorney.

They all come from Fox News don't they?
 
Trump wins again just like with China and Iran things will get back to normal. Hope it doesn't take too long. And what's up with Pelosi's eyebrows they look like they were drawn on with a Sharpie.

Like the arc Trump drew on the Hurricane Map?
 
Dershowitz is renowned by most all as being an expert on constitutional law. He's a Democrat too and still is, even though he is disgusted with his party. Starr? He s a star. I actually thought he went too far in the Clinton impeachment veering into areas not originally intended. But you need a guy like him. He will leave no stone un-turned. Sekulow? Why not?

TYou don't really think he was going to get Avenatti and Napalitano, did you? Ole Nappy is prolly majorly pissed he was passed over and will go on TV now saying Trump is guilty.

I am not at all surprised that the legal "experts" available to Trump all shill for Fox News.
 
Ya, I thought it odd that he left Dershowitz out - ESPECIALLY because he is the one that is going to do all the oral arguments on the constitutional requirements. He may be the one opening the defense.

Unless Dersh and Starr skills are severely eroded by age, as was poor Mueller, those two make for some pretty daunting team members. Too bad they didn't get Turley as well, that tri-fecta would have been perfect.
Turley may present a conflict of interest since he was involved in the house impeachment process

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
The left is boringly predictable. Rather than weight to hear the defenses position and argue against they jump the shark with character assasination attempts on the people who will be making the argument.

Speaking for myself i am curious to hearing the democrats complete argument closed door testimony included, as to why they feel removing Trump from office is necessary. Im also curious to hear Trumps response to that. I dont particulary care who is making the case for either side. I just want it be fair.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
The left is boringly predictable. Rather than weight to hear the defenses position and argue against they jump the shark with character assasination attempts on the people who will be making the argument.

Speaking for myself i am curious to hearing the democrats complete argument closed door testimony included, as to why they feel removing Trump from office is necessary. Im also curious to hear Trumps response to that. I dont particulary care who is making the case for either side. I just want it be fair.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

trouble
I wonder how you would know if a trial is fair. How do Americans decide what is fair given that so many people still love Bill Clinton and Obama? Obama-lovers and Trump-haters will end up thinking the trial was unfair because no Republicans are going to vote to convict.
The Republicans certainly want to make the trial to appear to be fair because they are working toward a quick acquittal without angering too many voters.
 
trouble
I wonder how you would know if a trial is fair. How do Americans decide what is fair given that so many people still love Bill Clinton and Obama? Obama-lovers and Trump-haters will end up thinking the trial was unfair because no Republicans are going to vote to convict.
The Republicans certainly want to make the trial to appear to be fair because they are working toward a quick acquittal without angering too many voters.
I have already stated what a fair trial looks like to me in numerous threads. In a sense it is subjective to how each person defines what fair is. I think most of us have similiar definitions and regardless of how you feel about him, i think most of us can distinguish if the criteria was met to call it fair or not. Even if some people refuse to admit it outloud, privately they will either feel it was fair or not.
I do believe there is a portion of people who do not care if its fair or not, they just want him removed. They do not believe he legitimately won the election and removing him by any means is their top priority. Which to me is a kind of silly attitude because we are 7-8 months away from the election. If enough people agree he should be removed that is the appropiate time to do it.
It almost seems as if the democrats are not confident that they have enough voter support to vote him out and this is a desperate attempt at an end around. In a perverse way they are guility of what they claim trump is guility of. They are trying to tarnish him, hoping to influence the election.
It remains to be seen if its going to work or not. There is a full press campaign by the democrats and the media trying to convince voters that Trump is the encompassiment (sp?) Of all things that are bad and nothing good. Conservatives should not underestimate this threat. Its real.
It may backfire on the progressives and result in sweeping victories for the gop but i dont take that for granted. Neither should anyone else who is concerned by the manner they are trying to win. I think things are only gonna become uglier as we get closer to November.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Except, of course, that he's not a trial lawyer and he's making legal arguments with absolutely no precedence, based on nothing. Starr is a mendacious, incompetent clown, who got booted from Baylor because of covering up sexual abuse and Sekulow is the same, only wearing an obvious veneer of being a Christian whose got his own skeletons from financially abusing his charity and he's not a criminal attorney. He's not a defense attorney. He's got no experience or specialty in litigating the legal privileges of a president.

Flaming. Clown. Car.

I kinda like Dershowitz the best of all. This is a great gig for him too. He is in his twilight years and will pick up some good ducats for this as well as being able to showoff his vast knowledge of constitutional law. Best thing about hi is that he won't waver no matter what. He calls it by the book. Same with Starr but I do think Starr is too detailed and may ten to veer off into areas that aren't important. I like Sekulows style though I don't think he is as good on the law as the other two.

All in all, a fantastic team that will rip a hew one for the Dems. They will be holding their behinds and whimpering before this is all over crying to their buddies at CNN and MSNBS about how the all "Starr" team is being so unfair.
 
Its a shame Johnny Cochrane isn't alive.Trump could use him.If The Democrats are full of it you must acquit.

Good analogy but I would eliminate the "IF" and include and put sh in front of "it", and make a TShirt out of "it" with a turd signifying their case.
 
JEREMY STAHL is a propagandist who masquerades as a journalist. His opinions are more than a little suspect and hold no merit with me.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Oh trouble. what a lazy "nuh uh". Since you were probably too lazy to click on the article let alone read it, you'll see the hyperlinks to the source of the claims. Case in point, there was a hyperlink to an article where he's counter suing his rape accuser. Also, there was a a hyperlink where Dershowitz admits he got a massage at Epstein's house but he kept his underwear on and it was an old Russian women. Wait, I was wrong. He said it was an "old, old Russian woman". Yes, Epstein was famous for his "old, old Russian women".
 
Don't forget Alan Dershowitz. I'm sure he's a deplorable as well.

He's in there. I bolded Epstein instead of Dershowitz in his "paragraph" so he's listed. see above for some bonus deplorazation material.


Where were you when Mueller hired a bunch of Clinton people for his (supposedly neutral) investigation?

I'm sorry jay, I realize that you think that is some devastating rebuttal but Mueller "hiring a bunch of Clinton people" is just narrative you heard on the radio as well as "supposedly neutral". I think what you're looking for is a conservative chatroom.
 
If I'm not mistaken, I believe the team includes a liberal deplorable.

Dershowitz is in there. Maybe he used to be a liberal but it seems that ever since he got his massage at Epstein from a "old, old Russian woman" he's lost his mind.
 
The left is boringly predictable. Rather than weight to hear the defenses position and argue against they jump the shark with character assasination attempts on the people who will be making the argument.

Speaking for myself i am curious to hearing the democrats complete argument closed door testimony included, as to why they feel removing Trump from office is necessary. Im also curious to hear Trumps response to that. I dont particulary care who is making the case for either side. I just want it be fair.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

We are all curious to hear trump's responses, unfortunately none of us will hear trump respond because there is no way on earth he will take the oath and testify.
 
Trump wins again just like with China and Iran things will get back to normal. Hope it doesn't take too long. And what's up with Pelosi's eyebrows they look like they were drawn on with a Sharpie.

"Things will get back to normal."

Unbridled corruption is normal?

China and Iran are failures.
 
Dershowitz is in there. Maybe he used to be a liberal but it seems that ever since he got his massage at Epstein from a "old, old Russian woman" he's lost his mind.

It's really fascinating how he has degraded himself, along with Guiliani and Barr in the service of Trump. It's like everything that Trump touches dies. His generals, his legislators, his supporters all totally corrupted by the gratuitous pleasure of stoking an aggrieved demagogue.
 
We are all curious to hear trump's responses, unfortunately none of us will hear trump respond because there is no way on earth he will take the oath and testify.
Thats what he has a defense team for. You and others may not like that but it is a pretty standard thing.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Schiff and Nadler, that's as far as you have to go. Complete partisan hacks, Schiff only out distances Nadler by the number of lies he tells. You have members on the decmocrat managers who have been voting to impeach for over two years, but they are impartial. Hilarious.
Democrats fools, have just ignited every anti liberal/socialist, all the conservatives, large numbers of independents who think this is a waste and will come to nothing, all the Trump supporters or semi supporters to help in reelecting Donald John Trump. You democrats better get to your therapist and get something for another four years of TDS. Oh, wait. I'm sure Nancy already has another impeachment in the works. Donald had a picture made with some person who is under indictment.
 
Back
Top Bottom