• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nadler Doesn’t Have Control

Rexedgar

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
63,154
Reaction score
52,802
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Nadler let Lewandowski run rough-shod over he and his committee a few weeks ago. He is not in control of this circus either.....
 
Rexedgar said:
Nadler let Lewandowski run rough-shod over he and his committee a few weeks ago. He is not in control of this circus either.....
Click to expand...

Agreed.

Look at what he is doing today.

Does anyone think this hearing is legitimate?
 
ocean515 said:
Agreed.

Look at what he is doing today.

Does anyone think this hearing is legitimate?
Click to expand...

Republicans are purposely being disruptive in order to create a spectacle. They want to distract and create the impression of unfairness. They dont want to engage on the substance. As usual. Their behaviour is despicable.
Their points of order were bogus. Nadler told them he would consider it and that should have been the end of it. Clearly Nadler wanted to double check the rule that republicans were claiming.
 
chuckiechan said:
The guy is just phoning it in along with most House members with seniority.
Click to expand...

And where is the chief architect of the New Democratic Party's coup?

Where is the guy who worked with the CIA mole in the White House to create the kick off point of this whole unilateral charade?
 
theLiquidGuy said:
Republicans are purposely being disruptive in order to create a spectacle. They want to distract and create the impression of unfairness. They dont want to engage on the substance. As usual. Their behaviour is despicable.
Their points of order were bogus. Nadler told them he would consider it and that should have been the end of it. Clearly Nadler wanted to double check the rule that republicans were claiming.
Click to expand...

Citing points of order and process is not disruptive, it's legitimate, and the reaction by Nadler is quite revealing.

This whole circus produced by the New Left controlling the House is despicable.

Thankfully, they are making it very easy for Republicans to produce campaign advertising that will be broadcast in every home across the country next year.
 
ocean515 said:
Citing points of order and process is not disruptive, it's legitimate, and the reaction by Nadler is quite revealing.
Click to expand...
This is not my first committee hearing. The point of order was not addressing anything inside of that committee hearing. It was not proper. It was meant as a republican side show for fox news. Typical republican non-substancial tactics.
 
theLiquidGuy said:
This is not my first committee hearing. The point of order was not addressing anything inside of that committee hearing. It was not proper. It was meant as a republican side show for fox news. Typical republican non-substancial tactics.
Click to expand...

This is not my first committee hearing either. Of course the points of order were legitimate. You need to get better instructions on how to debate from the shift supervisor.
 
theLiquidGuy said:
Republicans are purposely being disruptive in order to create a spectacle. They want to distract and create the impression of unfairness. They dont want to engage on the substance. As usual. Their behaviour is despicable.
Their points of order were bogus. Nadler told them he would consider it and that should have been the end of it. Clearly Nadler wanted to double check the rule that republicans were claiming.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

79322655_3171206569572485_8894485912595988480_n.jpg
 
Oh, another Trumpster bawlroom, nothing new here. :inandout:
 
Wow Castor's defense is that people are mean to trump...
 
theLiquidGuy said:
Republicans are purposely being disruptive in order to create a spectacle. They want to distract and create the impression of unfairness. They dont want to engage on the substance. As usual. Their behaviour is despicable.
Their points of order were bogus. Nadler told them he would consider it and that should have been the end of it. Clearly Nadler wanted to double check the rule that republicans were claiming.
Click to expand...

Hey, it's their best strategy. They aren't gonna win on substance. They're praying for sympathy from the rubes.
 
ocean515 said:
Where have I questioned who has the power?

What a fail!!!!
Click to expand...

Answer the question so that we may know that you know the answer.
 
Is he ever going to get to a defense?

I think it's a wrong move to list all the crimes, high crimes and misdemeanors trump has committed up to this point...
 
GDViking said:
Is he ever going to get to a defense?

I think it's a wrong move to list all the crimes, high crimes and misdemeanors trump has committed up to this point...
Click to expand...

Nope. He wont. There is no defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Castor should have a lie detector attached to him, there would be bells and whistles going off consistently...
 
GDViking said:
Is he ever going to get to a defense?

I think it's a wrong move to list all the crimes, high crimes and misdemeanors trump has committed up to this point...
Click to expand...

There is no reason to even participate in this charade. Pelosi already ordered Articles of Impeachment to be drafted.

So what's the point of it?

Nadler read a response to a motion to strike accusations made by a witness from the record. He read it. That means they were prepared for such objections.

What a charade.

How stupid do the Democrats think people outside their sphere are?
 
What exactly is an "ambiguous fact"???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom