• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who benefits from an investigation into the Bidens - not so fast!

Bullseye

All Lives Matter or No Lives Matter
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
47,703
Reaction score
16,576
Location
San Diego
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Ok, let's get the elephant out of the room, yes, Trump could benefit IF corruption was found AND Biden survived the parade of state primaries and caucuses to win the Democratic nomination. It would be a hell of a warclub for Trump to wield during the election season.

So, case closed, end of discussion, turn out the lights, the party's over?

Well no, not so fast.
IF Biden were found to be corrupt, would that also benefit all the other Dem candidates? Given them that that same weapon to bludgeon him in every state, at every debate, interview and public appearance. To me, Biden's guilty would actually be of greater value to these guys than to Trump.

Finally, what if, all indications to the contrary, Joe and Hunter were found completely blameless and innocent. Would removing all doubt of corruption from his head be a boost to Biden?

This opinion piece covers the question far better than my humble effort.

Extra credit: Why it's okay for Trump to investigate Biden


PS: Please spare us the "Yeah, from a right wing rag" comments - It a given that the DMC is in the tank for Dems. (DMC = Democrat-Media-Complex).
 
So Trump is doing Democratic dirty-work?
 
I'll ask a favor again, since I'm ignored by Bull, ask him what is the predicate for investigating Joe.

Thanks.
 
IF Biden were found to be corrupt, would that also benefit all the other Dem candidates? Given them that that same weapon to bludgeon him in every state, at every debate, interview and public appearance.
No, and the way in which the Democratic candidates have handled this in the debates clearly shows that. They have all given full throated defenses of Biden. The investigation into Hillary didn't help anybody bug Trump and you know it.

Finally, what if, all indications to the contrary, Joe and Hunter were found completely blameless and innocent. Would removing all doubt of corruption from his head be a boost to Biden?
Bwhahahahahahahahaha!!!! Are you ****ing serious right now? How did that work out for Hillary Clinton. She has been completely absolved of every accusation made by the right in this country for Decades. That did not stop them from repeating the same lie over and over until half the country believed it.
 
Trump didn't care about investigating the Biden's in as much as he cared that Zelensky give a public announcement that he was investigating them. It was the public announcement that he that wanted most because he could use that in his re-election campaign and turn the blame for interfering in the US election on Ukraine instead of Russia. It's a brilliant plan, actually...but it was created by a former KGB intelligence officer...so why wouldn't it be?
 
Trump didn't care about investigating the Biden's in as much as he cared that Zelensky give a public announcement that he was investigating them. It was the public announcement that he that wanted most because he could use that in his re-election campaign and turn the blame for interfering in the US election on Ukraine instead of Russia. It's a brilliant plan, actually...but it was created by a former KGB intelligence officer...so why wouldn't it be?
Is Zelensky's public announcement on you tube? I missed it

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Is Zelensky's public announcement on you tube? I missed it

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Fortunately, he was advised not to get involved in US elections. Unlike Trump, he listens to good advice.
 
I'll ask a favor again, since I'm ignored by Bull, ask him what is the predicate for investigating Joe.

Thanks.

I'll answer...

Obama administration corruption.

btw, in a few weeks we'll be finding out about even more Obama administration corruption.
 
I'll answer...

Obama administration corruption.

btw, in a few weeks we'll be finding out about even more Obama administration corruption.

Which has zero to do with the investigation, zero.
 
Ok, let's get the elephant out of the room, yes, Trump could benefit IF corruption was found AND Biden survived the parade of state primaries and caucuses to win the Democratic nomination. It would be a hell of a warclub for Trump to wield during the election season.

So, case closed, end of discussion, turn out the lights, the party's over?

Well no, not so fast.
IF Biden were found to be corrupt, would that also benefit all the other Dem candidates? Given them that that same weapon to bludgeon him in every state, at every debate, interview and public appearance. To me, Biden's guilty would actually be of greater value to these guys than to Trump.

Finally, what if, all indications to the contrary, Joe and Hunter were found completely blameless and innocent. Would removing all doubt of corruption from his head be a boost to Biden?

This opinion piece covers the question far better than my humble effort.

Extra credit: Why it's okay for Trump to investigate Biden


PS: Please spare us the "Yeah, from a right wing rag" comments - It a given that the DMC is in the tank for Dems. (DMC = Democrat-Media-Complex).

All of which is both deliciously and hilariously irrelevant to the fact that twump committed very serious crimes and has actually admitted to have done so, w/members of his own teaming confirming that.

And there is no evidence, whatsoever, that Biden did anything illegal.

Yet again, you simply have no clue as to what this is all about and are in waaaaay over your head.
 
All of which is both deliciously and hilariously irrelevant to the fact that twump committed very serious crimes and has actually admitted to have done so, w/members of his own teaming confirming that.

And there is no evidence, whatsoever, that Biden did anything illegal.

Yet again, you simply have no clue as to what this is all about and are in waaaaay over your head.

As usual, pure bull****. You ARE consistent.
 
No, and the way in which the Democratic candidates have handled this in the debates clearly shows that. They have all given full throated defenses of Biden. The investigation into Hillary didn't help anybody bug Trump and you know it.
You must be watching different debates. :lamo

MrWonka said:
Bwhahahahahahahahaha!!!! Are you ****ing serious right now? How did that work out for Hillary Clinton. She has been completely absolved of every accusation made by the right in this country for Decades. That did not stop them from repeating the same lie over and over until half the country believed it.
LOL, what universe are you living in?
 
I'll answer...

Obama administration corruption.
That is not an answer, Biden is not "the Obama admin". A predicate is the genesis, the initial crime or accusation, against Joe that triggers an investigation. Your potus has demand that Ukraine, China, et al, should investigate Joe....but no valid charge is mentioned. You can't claim the ouster of Shokin since even GOP leaders (along with the rest of the world) made that demand......and it doesn't apply to China.

You have nothing, so try again.
 
As usual, pure bull****. You ARE consistent.

Correct. Your entire OP was pure bull****.

Not even remotely surprised you'd try pretend you understand what this is all about in order to appear relevant.

As usual, you cannot counter a single point I made.

Don't go changin'.
 
Like I mentioned elsewhere, there never seemed to be a request for a physical investigation. It was about Zelensky making an announcement of one.

It's the same as Trump telling Mexico's president the wall was the least of his problem, he needed Mexico to verbally communicate the two presidents were working to get an agreement. Trump makes it clear anything else would make him look bad. All optics. Biggest crowds, thinking he's got great hearing, a stable genius and whatever other bs he spews. Con man tactics.

One things for sure, Trump burned his bridge for trying smear whoever does end up running against him.
 
Correct. Your entire OP was pure bull****.

Not even remotely surprised you'd try pretend you understand what this is all about in order to appear relevant.

As usual, you cannot counter a single point I made.

Don't go changin'.
You don't make points, you spew mindless BS. And play stupid "twump" games that most of us abandoned in fourth grade.
 
Ok, let's get the elephant out of the room, yes, Trump could benefit IF corruption was found AND Biden survived the parade of state primaries and caucuses to win the Democratic nomination. It would be a hell of a warclub for Trump to wield during the election season.

So, case closed, end of discussion, turn out the lights, the party's over?

Well no, not so fast.
IF Biden were found to be corrupt, would that also benefit all the other Dem candidates? Given them that that same weapon to bludgeon him in every state, at every debate, interview and public appearance. To me, Biden's guilty would actually be of greater value to these guys than to Trump.

Finally, what if, all indications to the contrary, Joe and Hunter were found completely blameless and innocent. Would removing all doubt of corruption from his head be a boost to Biden?

This opinion piece covers the question far better than my humble effort.

Extra credit: Why it's okay for Trump to investigate Biden


PS: Please spare us the "Yeah, from a right wing rag" comments - It a given that the DMC is in the tank for Dems. (DMC = Democrat-Media-Complex).

so you want everyone to lend credibility to this idiotic conspiracy theory by NOT considering where the hell it coming from.

Brilliant. Truly brilliant.
 
Trump didn't care about investigating the Biden's in as much as he cared that Zelensky give a public announcement that he was investigating them. It was the public announcement that he that wanted most because he could use that in his re-election campaign and turn the blame for interfering in the US election on Ukraine instead of Russia. It's a brilliant plan, actually...but it was created by a former KGB intelligence officer...so why wouldn't it be?
LOL, did he tell you that? How's he going to remove blame from Russia when they produced the Steele Dossier? Ukraine is allegedly complicit in the Manafort case, so there's that. Nice try.
 
You don't make points, you spew mindless BS. And play stupid "twump" games that most of us abandoned in fourth grade.

LOL! Right on que, your fantasy narrative comes out in full force.

Nothing you linked to either justifies an investigation into Biden nor addresses the crimes twump has commited, not can you demonstrate or substantiate such jackass claims as made in your links.

Again, you're in way over your head, and I don't expect you to understand what this is all about.
 
so you want everyone to lend credibility to this idiotic conspiracy theory by NOT considering where the hell it coming from.

Brilliant. Truly brilliant.

So you got nothing but a weak-assed personal attack. IF you actually comprehended the OP, I offered several scenarios looking for some comment. You fail.
 
LOL! Right on que, your fantasy narrative comes out in full force.

Nothing you linked to either justifies an investigation into Biden nor addresses the crimes twump has commited, not can you demonstrate or substantiate such jackass claims as made in your links.

Again, you're in way over your head, and I don't expect you to understand what this is all about.
And right on cue you spew worthless crap. As you will soon again.
 
I'll answer...

Obama administration corruption.

btw, in a few weeks we'll be finding out about even more Obama administration corruption.
Don't forget the son of the sitting Vice President gets a $50k job for a company whose business he has no experience and for which he never shows up. By the way, his daddy coerced Ukraine into cancelling an investigation into Hunter's employer. Nothing suspicious there, right?
 
Which has zero to do with the investigation, zero.
Other than Biden being Obama's point man on Ukraine, and . . . well, you know the rest, Burisma corruptions, canceled investigations, Hunter's no-show job, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom