• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The requirement to impeach Trump based on his phone call:

Mr Person said:
Question, Mr. Scholarman, who would rule that a conviction on articles of impeachment for having a stupid face was unconstitutional?
Click to expand...

Supreme Court obviously!! IF you disagree say why!!!
 
Cardinal said:
So the idea that the President's role is to "investigate corruption" demonstrates a gross ignorance of history.

.
Click to expand...

why ignorant? President runs FBI and Justice Department which exist to investigate corruption???? Can you tell us????
 
Mr Person said:
More dishonest edits.

.
Click to expand...

James972 said:
show the dishonest edit or admit you lack IQ for it
Click to expand...

Easy: here was the post you edited dishonestly this time:

Mr Person said:
More dishonest edits. Why is that a thing you do?

Question, Mr. Scholarman, who would rule that a conviction on articles of impeachment for having a stupid face was unconstitutional?


Careful. If you name a court, you will have said the stupidest thing in all reality.
Click to expand...




And I said:

Mr Person said:
What part of my statement confused you?

"High crimes and misdemeanor" had a rather specific meaning back then. It has to do with corruption in obtaining and exercising office. It is not tied to the U.S. code (which did not exist at ratification). They didn't define it since they knew that they didn't define it. They didn't give judicial review. Because they didn't define it and because a court cannot throw out conviction on articles of impeachment, it's a purely political process. The president could be impeached for having a stupid face if the votes were there.

You squawk without meaning.

OMFG...are you serious?

You reply in a separate post to each of his points to try to make it look like you had more (nothing) to say?

:lamo
Click to expand...


You chopped that to:

James972 said:
OMFG...are you serious?
Click to expand...

yes, if you disagree say why or admit you lack the IQ to be here.
Click to expand...



Any more questions?

Edit: nevermind. I see one of your many super-clever strategies is to not only dishonestly edit, but to do that PLUS respond phrase-by-phrase to try to make it look like you have more to say. That is a very stupid thing to do. Shame on you.
 
James972 said:
why ignorant? President runs FBI and Justice Department which exist to investigate corruption???? Can you tell us????
Click to expand...

Here, again, is my whole post:

The above post retcons history. Presidents most assuredly do not order or oversee investigations.

Also, Trump has only ever ordered investigations into two groups of people thus far:

1)Past or future campaign rivals, and
2)People who have led or participated in investigations on himself, his campaign or his administration.

So the idea that the President's role is to "investigate corruption" demonstrates a gross ignorance of history.

Now of course some idiot will smash "reply with quote" and write "Butwhatabout Obama and Holder?" Okay, what about Obama and Holder? And that idiot will have no intelligent response to that.
 
Cardinal said:
"Butwhatabout Obama and Holder?" Okay, what about Obama and Holder? And that idiot will have no intelligent response to that.
Click to expand...

???? FBI, Justice, State, all under Chief Executive and have overseas investigative units. Feel embarrassed?
 
James972 said:
???? FBI, Justice, State, all under Chief Executive and have overseas investigative units. Feel embarrassed?
Click to expand...

Here, again, is my whole post:

The above post retcons history. Presidents most assuredly do not order or oversee investigations.

Also, Trump has only ever ordered investigations into two groups of people thus far:

1)Past or future campaign rivals, and
2)People who have led or participated in investigations on himself, his campaign or his administration.

So the idea that the President's role is to "investigate corruption" demonstrates a gross ignorance of history.

Now of course some idiot will smash "reply with quote" and write "Butwhatabout Obama and Holder?" Okay, what about Obama and Holder? And that idiot will have no intelligent response to that.
 
Mr Person said:
dishonestly edit,
Click to expand...

please show just one dishonest edit!!! This would mean one line with what you wrote and another with the dishonest edit. Do you understand??
 
Cardinal said:
Presidents most assuredly do not order or oversee investigations.

.
Click to expand...

they do it all the time through FBI State Justice ,Homeland security CIA etc etc. I'm embarrassed for you.
 
Cardinal said:
Also, Trump has only ever ordered investigations into two groups of people thus far:
Click to expand...

Executive Branch has 1000's of investigations going on all the time. Sorry to rock our goof liberal world.
 
James972 said:
nobody said they do order overseas investigations!!!! they can ask for them though!
Click to expand...

Cardinal said: "he above post retcons history. Presidents most assuredly do not order or oversee investigations.

Whoa. Don't you know that oversee and overseas are two different words with vastly different meanings?
 
Cardinal said:
Prove it.
Click to expand...

the liberal wants me to prove for example that the OCI investigates????????????? So embarrassing. Why not become a conservative so you wont lose every debate??


The Overseas Criminal Investigations (OCI)
The Overseas Criminal Investigations (OCI) supports DSS operations at more than 100 locations around the globe. Its assistant regional security officer investigator (ARSO-Is) investigate passport and visa fraud, assist in investigation crimes against U.S. citizens, and train and collaborate with foreign nation law enforcement and immigration authorities.
 
Mr Person said:
respond phrase-by-phrase to try to make it look like you have more to say. .
Click to expand...

wrong, to focus on all that is said and not bury it in a long post that no one will care to read. 1+1=2
 
James972 said:
Executive Branch has 1000's of investigations going on all the time. Sorry to rock our goof liberal world.
Click to expand...

Show that trump has ever ordered investigations beyond

1)Past or future campaign rivals, or
2)People who have led or participated in investigations on himself, his campaign or his administration.
 
Mr Person said:
Careful. If you name a court, you will have said the stupidest thing in all reality.
.
Click to expand...

I named Supreme Court and you ran away with your tail between your legs rather than demonstrate it was stupidest thing in all reality??? Are you embarrassed to be a liberal yet???
 
James972 said:
the liberal wants me to prove for example that the OCI investigates????????????? So embarrassing. Why not become a conservative so you wont lose every debate??


The Overseas Criminal Investigations (OCI)
The Overseas Criminal Investigations (OCI) supports DSS operations at more than 100 locations around the globe. Its assistant regional security officer investigator (ARSO-Is) investigate passport and visa fraud, assist in investigation crimes against U.S. citizens, and train and collaborate with foreign nation law enforcement and immigration authorities.
Click to expand...

Prove that there is a historical practice of the President starting and overseeing investigations.
 
Cardinal said:
Prove that there is a historical practice of the President starting and overseeing investigations.
Click to expand...

the Executive starts and overseas all investigations or stops all investigations. Do you image the Girl Scouts do that? Who??????????????
 
James972 said:
the Executive starts and overseas all investigations or stops all investigations. Do you image the Girl Scouts do that? Who??????????????
Click to expand...

Prove that there is a historical practice of the President starting and overseeing investigations.
 
James972 said:
please show just one dishonest edit!!! This would mean one line with what you wrote and another with the dishonest edit. Do you understand??
Click to expand...

James972 said:
wrong, to focus on all that is said and not bury it in a long post that no one will care to read. 1+1=2
Click to expand...

James972 said:
I named Supreme Court and you ran away with your tail between your legs rather than demonstrate it was stupidest thing in all reality??? Are you embarrassed to be a liberal yet???
Click to expand...



If you want anyone to waste time responding to you, you have to stop dishonestly chopping their posts up. And no, I will not be arguing with you about how or whether you dishonestly chopped my posts because they are right there, on earlier pages, having been dishonestly chopped. That's especially true when your responses to being told you dishonestly chopped up posts are to....dishonestly chop posts up.

:2wave:
 
Acadia said:
The Senate will not impeach Trump, but enjoy the Democrat **** show, because it's all they're good for.
Click to expand...
I heard Nixon had the support of the Senate until a few days before the vote.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
I heard Nixon had the support of the Senate until a few days before the vote.
Click to expand...

The other party wasn't radical, open-border socialists back then.
 
Acadia said:
The Senate will not impeach Trump, but enjoy the Democrat **** show, because it's all they're good for.
Click to expand...
Democrats are gonna continue to make noise but they will not impeach him and if republicans have a landslide victory you will see red state dems come out claiming they wee against the partisan impeachments during midterm elections in 2022.

They are playing a very predictable game and they are not fooling anyone with any political savy.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
James972 said:
The requirement to impeach Trump based on his phone call
Click to expand...

If it was all based off of the phone call, why are they having people testify in front of Congress?

(Hint: it's more than just the phone call)
 
Mr Person said:
:lamo

Nope. The only requirement has to do with a number of votes in the house for impeachment, and a number of votes in the senate for conviction on those articles of impeachment.
Click to expand...

That's because the Democratic Party treats the US Constitution and Bill Of Rights like toilet paper - and therefore don't even pretend they can totally ignore what the Constitution says is the basis for impeachment.

Judge's should tell that to juries in criminal cases too, don't you think? "Members of the jury. Laws and statutes are irrelevant to making your decision. You can make your verdict based upon however you feel and find the Defendant guilty of whatever you want to. Disliking the Defendant is sufficient to finding the Defendant guilt of anything."

That is your view of "rule of law."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom