I find your claims wildly inconsistent, generally inaccurate, and it seems you are contradicting the very premise of the title of your own thread. First of all, not all republicans and conservative pundits were "birthers", and in fact most were not! Besides, if there hadn't been inconsistencies regarding his birth, and had Obama released all the pertinent info early on, then that evidence would've proved his citizenship and put an end to the whole issue. But the reality was that Obama and the media milked the issue to the detriment of the few birther republicans.
The claim that republicans "blame every black guy who is gunned down by a white guy", is just ridiculous and you provide no actual evidence for which cases you are talking about! Certainly there ARE cases where leftists immediately jump on the "racist cop shoots black guy for no reason" bandwagon, usually because the dishonest media are the ones pulling the wagon they jumped on! For instance, the biggest example was Michael Brown in Ferguson. The BS media narrative was "hands up, don't shoot", and that Brown was merely an innocent victim, murdered by a racist white cop for NO reason, as he was shot in the back. Well, guess what? That entire story was bull***t... The media omitted the officers testimony, the witness testimony , and instead they pushed the false, race-baiting narrative! ALL of which was later DISPROVEN with actual EVIDENCE!! He was NOT shot in the back as they claimed, and he was NOT an innocent victim! He had just finished a strong arm robbery of a store, then the police officer tried arresting him because of that! But he fought the cop, tried to steal his gun, and was shot, just as wouldve happened if a white guy did the same thing!
As far as the "lock her up" calls by trump supporters at rallies, she should have been prosecuted, because it was PROVEN that she repeatedly lied to the FBI about top secret emails sent on her private server, and because she INTENTIONALLY DESTROYED EVIDENCE when she had her imporoper private server wiped of 30,000 emails, instead of turning them into investigators! That's called a cover up! She also lied about personal communication devices, when she claimed she had only owned 1 of them.. Later, the FBI discovered that in fact she had at least 15 of them, ALL of which were also wiped of information and destroyed, instead of being turned over to investigators! She SHOULD have been prosecuted, but fortunately for her, the corrupt FBI agents had already decided to give her a pass BEFORE the investigation even began, and because they refused to seat a grand jury to decide if she should've been tried, which was very unusual and corrupt!
Lastly, your thread title and Ford's accusations go hand in hand. In order to decide someone's guilt, you need actual EVIDENCE, which you don't seem to think is necessary. Well, the 3 people who Ford offered up as witnesses to her accusation, ALL said that they DONT recall ANY aspects of her story! None remember the party, none recall ever meeting Cavanaugh, and none recall her claiming to have been raped at that time. She has also been wildly inconsistent with her claims, such as the date. She can't even say what year it happened, and at different times, she's claimed early 80s, then mid 80s at other times. She claimed that 4 people were in the room where she was "raped", but then changed her story to just 2 people. She can remember every detail about the rape, but she cant get any of those details right, plus she cant say where the party was, doesn't know which street or which house.
When ALL your witnesses say they never witnessed any such crime, and you're all over the map with important details, and there's major inconsistencies, and your own family didn't sign on to your paper, then there's no evidence! Just because YOU decide you don't like someone, doesn't make them guilty of crimes! Whether you like it or not, people are legally innocent until PROVEN guilty. That requires evidence,
