• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Would Kavanagh's Accusers Have to Gain by Making False Accusations?

Gorsuch replacing Scalia wouldn't change the balance of the Court. Kennedy, while being nominally pro gun also wrote several of the decisions the left loves-especially on abortion and homosexual rights

He was the swing vote, and that's why the Left is going bllz to the wall and taking down anyone and anything in their way. This one doesn't even compare to Gorsuch.
 
What do Ford and others have to gain from making false accusations? Ford is receiving death threats. Her family has had to go into hiding. Why in the world would someone subject themselves to this level of harassment and scrutiny if there wasn't any truth to their allegations. The same goes for the women who accused Roy Moore. I just don't get the conservatives all circling the wagons and calling her a liar.

First, lurchadams, I think you mean "What would they have had to gain if they are lying and are found out beyond any shadow of a doubt to be lying." I am not calling her a liar. I have yet to see her testimony and assess her credibility. Also, even if she is not telling the factual truth, it would not necessarily mean that she was lying. She could be totally mistaken about the identity. She could have misremembered. She could be delusional. There are many possibilities beyond Dr. Ford either telling the truth or knowingly purveying falsehoods.

But here is what the accusers have to gain off the top of my head:

1) Because she is politically left-leaning, these are statements in her own political interest. If she keeps Kavanaugh from being seated, she will have preserved Roe v. Wade and a woman's constitutional right beyond any doubt for the foreseeable future.
2) She will be seen as the hero who kept a sexual predator from getting Supreme Court. And with that, she will have the accolades and prestige benefitting a woman of her heroic station much like Anita Hill...except unlike Anita Hill, she will have actually unseated a Supreme Court nominee.
 
He was the swing vote, and that's why the Left is going bllz to the wall and taking down anyone and anything in their way. This one doesn't even compare to Gorsuch.

In other words, we can expect this to happen again if Trump is Prez when RBG dies.

Great. :(
 
In other words, we can expect this to happen again if Trump is Prez when RBG dies.

Great. :(

I can't even imagine the level of insanity. I think it will be Amy Coney Barrett, and then we'll see just how much Dems care about women being victims.
 
I can't even imagine the level of insanity. I think it will be Amy Coney Barrett, and then we'll see just how much Dems care about women being victims.

I'm sure they'll find something in their slime-covered bag of nastiness.
 
How divided we are. Here are my observations from most responses so far:

Conservatives seem certain Ford is lying and that her motives are selfish. Either she craves money or fame. Conservatives also go on and on about how slimy and devious Dems are, totally overlooking what the GOP did to Obama when he nominated Garland. They also overlook the fact that the GOP Judiciary Committee withheld documentation pertaining to Kavanah until the 11th hour to prevent the Dems from having time to vet him.

Liberals for the most part aren't taking a stand on whether or not Ford is lying. They just want her allegations investigated fairly.
 
Seriously? I can't believe this is a mystery to anyone. Are there any other people who may be curious as to what could be gained by robbing an armored car that just loaded up stacks of money from a bank? Its money!

So, what could hardcore partisans possibly gain by destroying the credibility and reputation of a perceived ideological enemy? Gee, that's tough...... Lets think it through. If you are a left wing activist, and you've been deeply indoctrinated into an ideology that desires to make vast, sweeping changes to your govt and society. But there's an ideological opponent who is just about to be appointed to a position, where he can OPPOSE/PREVENT your ideological brothers and sisters from undermining, overturning and rewriting the very laws and restrictions that have prevented you from instituting your radical policies. Hmm. Sounds like a big threat to your agenda! But how could destroying his reputation, credibility, and turning everyone against him so that doesn't get hired, possibly benefit you? Oh yeah, the answer just may be found inside those "doesn't get hired" words! Lol

If you can knock out that ideological enemy, by falsely demonizing him and destroying his reputation, then you will have more time to wait for the mid term elections, where you can potentially block any judge whose ideological beliefs aren't in line with leftist doctrine. Again, this thread must be meant for sarcastic effect. Destroying reputations and demonizing perceived enemies, is not only the democrats'/medias' tactic du jour, it's the tactic du every jour!
 
Last edited:
How divided we are. Here are my observations from most responses so far:

Conservatives seem certain Ford is lying and that her motives are selfish. Either she craves money or fame. Conservatives also go on and on about how slimy and devious Dems are, totally overlooking what the GOP did to Obama when he nominated Garland. They also overlook the fact that the GOP Judiciary Committee withheld documentation pertaining to Kavanah until the 11th hour to prevent the Dems from having time to vet him.

Liberals for the most part aren't taking a stand on whether or not Ford is lying. They just want her allegations investigated fairly.

It's interesting to think about the way the media are treating Cavanaugh, over unproven accusations made when he was 16-17 years old, and contrast that with the 4 women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault as an adult. May as well include the media's 14+ year long cover-up up Brett Weinstein's well known sexual assaults. The media and the democrats protected Clinton and Weinstein until it was no longer politically inconvenient to cover up for them. But they have essentially already proclaimed Brett Cavanaugh to be a major, hardcore sex criminal.
 
It's interesting to think about the way the media are treating Cavanaugh, over unproven accusations made when he was 16-17 years old, and contrast that with the 4 women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault as an adult. May as well include the media's 14+ year long cover-up up Brett Weinstein's well known sexual assaults. The media and the democrats protected Clinton and Weinstein until it was no longer politically inconvenient to cover up for them. But they have essentially already proclaimed Brett Cavanaugh to be a major, hardcore sex criminal.

After watching the hearings today one things for sure - Kavanah is an arrogant liar.
 
Professor??? Psychologist??? Screw that! It's the prestigious title of being the Kavanagh accusers. This is after all one of the highest awards and job titles in the country after all!! It's what all women aspire to be. It comes complete with requirements that you have to give a speech and get interrogated by a bunch of old white dudes who don't believe you and Google will immortalize it forever. Because every time someone ever google's your name from here on out. That will be your shinning achievement. "Girl Power yea!!!" But you also get to have some hippie chicks outside raising their fists at the closed door.....

How about you stop posting this embarrassing **** you post? Old white dudes? Were they racists toward the white Dr Ford? Hmmm? They don't believe her for good reasons, like her story kept changing, she offers no proof, the timing of 36 years, her supporters didn't support her, and I'm sure there are others. Democrats involved made it obviously look like a hack job. I don't think I need to go on.
 
What do Ford and others have to gain from making false accusations? Ford is receiving death threats. Her family has had to go into hiding. Why in the world would someone subject themselves to this level of harassment and scrutiny if there wasn't any truth to their allegations. The same goes for the women who accused Roy Moore. I just don't get the conservatives all circling the wagons and calling her a liar.
They STOP TRUMP, the ultimate achievement in the loony leftosphere.
 
I can't even imagine the level of insanity. I think it will be Amy Coney Barrett, and then we'll see just how much Dems care about women being victims.

I think the silver lining in all of this is that it virtually garauntees Amy Barrett to be the next Republican pick for SC should a new seat that comes up.
 
A million dollars on Go Fund Me.
To be a hero of the Democratic Party and #MeToo movement.
To be a hero on her university campus.
To have her 15 minutes of fame.
To be able to continue her self pity party now on a national level.
 
Back
Top Bottom