Roll your eyes all you wish, but back during the campaign period, when everyone was assured by the MSM via polling Trump could never win?
That's just revisionist. The MSM reported Clinton had the lead in the polls. Which she did. She also mostly covered the lead she had in the polls on election night.
Stop with the false information.
I was noticing that Trump was campaigning the old-way in those "swing" states, and he was drawing large crowds of supporters at each rally.
And Russia targeted ads in those same states. Like I said.
It wasn't Russia-Trump "collusion" that won those States
Says who? You? Trump won Michigan by ~10,000 votes, Wisconsin by ~22,800 votes. We know Russia
targeted those states with ads.
You are literally just making things up right now.
Those people may have "followed the news," but I SOURCED the news myself. Each time reviewing the evidence and actually reading the articles and watching the full tapes...not just looking at headlines and listening to the same talking heads spouting propaganda rather than reporting the news. I found that Headlines were not supported by their own articles, CNN and the rest not supported by the video evidence they used. I think I have a better grasp on reality than you seem to.
Now you're just posting lies.
We know Trump interacted with Maria Butina and promised sanctions relief in 2015. We know Trump promised sanctions relief again in 2016 when he met with foreign diplomats in a completely unusual setting. We know Sessions met with Kislyak at the same speech in 2016 and later lied about it. We know Russia had the DCLeaks website go live the day before they met with Trump Jr., et all in June. We know Trump asked Russia to find more Clinton e-mails and Russia that very day began attacking Clinton operatives. Throw in Carter Page, Papadapolous/Mifsud, Erik Prince, etc., along with the fact we know for a fact Russian acted on Trump's behalf and one has all they need to know to know you are posting lies.
The same kind of "evidence" of dirt-digging that the DNC engaged in you mean?
More lies. You're trying to create a false equivalence to the copious amounts of evidence of Trump campaign officials interacting with Russian government officials/spies and the DNC hiring a company who hired a private investigator who did his own research.
You clearly have ZERO intention of objectivity or reviewing actual facts.
That's about all the evidence there is
More lies.
not a jot of evidence showing Trump or anyone in his campaign were aware of beyond what little was reported in the media, much less colluding with Russian hacking and bot efforts on social media.
:lol:
More lies. Or, like I said, you clearly don't follow the news. I mean, Rob Goldstone LITERALLY told Trump Jr. of the Russian government's support of candidate Trump.
So either you posted a lie about following the news or are posting lies about the level of interactions between Russia and Trump.
This is the problem with following the news as you put it...IMO you simply believe what they say without making sure it is really true.
The things I am talking about are things which have been confirmed by people who worked with the Trump campaign or by Mueller indictments. Again, stop posting lies.
