• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Probing Mueller

Ummm... Mueller was the US District Attorney for Northern California when this was going on.

The article states, "It was Mueller, first as an assistant U.S. attorney then as the acting U.S. attorney in Boston, who wrote letter to the parole and pardon boards throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by the FBI lies."

Mueller was appointed US Attorney for Northern California in 1998.
 
Director Comey: fired
Dep Dir McCabe: fired
Cheif Consel Baker: demoted, left
Chief of Staff Rybicki: left
FBI Consel Page: demoted, then left
Dep Dir Counterintel Strzok: demoted, fired

That's quite a record of achievement that you appear to be touting. :roll:
This web is only now starting to unravel. Next one is going to start with Ohr.



LOL. It was a lie then. And it's a lie now.

  • Benghazi
  • al-Qaida on the run.
  • IRS conspired to target conservative and pro-Israel groups
  • Operation Fast and Furious
  • massive culling of Associated Press reporters' phone records concerning a leak investigation
  • slandering Fox News reporter James Rosen over classified information
  • Obama's lies on Obamacare were legion and scandalous
  • After Obama's failure to pass cap-and-trade legislation through Congress to purportedly reduce the global temperature by suppressing traditional energy production and consumption, his Environmental Protection Agency unilaterally and unconstitutionally issued a decree to accomplish his goal administratively. Some called this one of the biggest power grabs in American history, as the EPA had positioned itself to regulate fuel economy, set climate policy for the nation and amend the Clean Air Act — powers never delegated to it by Congress.
  • The Obama administration flagrantly defied a federal court order on his moratorium on offshore drilling when his interior secretary, Ken Salazar, said he would just reimpose the moratorium based on information that wasn't fully developed earlier.
  • Obama rigged the playing field to secure for his labor-union friends a bigger stake in his new General Motors than was warranted by their actual ownership interest. He robbed secured creditors of their preferred-creditor status and the value of their investment by using the power of his office to strong-arm a restructuring of the company. When Democratic Party donor and super-lawyer Tom Lauria opposed this plan on behalf of his client, according to Lauria, the White House threatened to destroy his client's reputation.
  • The Obama-Hillary Clinton FISA scandal, the egregiousness of which is being casually dismissed by many, will someday be fully exposed.
  • Then, there's the Iran nuclear deal

Your recollection is a fantasy land.


Let's not forget Solyndra, which received $535 million of taxpayer dollars in 2009 as part of Obama's stimulus program. The company was owned and run by wealthy Democrats who contributed heavily to Democratic candidates. It went bankrupt in 2011.
 
Let's not forget Solyndra, which received $535 million of taxpayer dollars in 2009 as part of Obama's stimulus program. The company was owned and run by wealthy Democrats who contributed heavily to Democratic candidates. It went bankrupt in 2011.

True. But then what did you expect from an economic stimulus plan that had to play by environmentalist rules?
Financial viability and self sustainability? :lamo

I welcome the day when renewable energy sources out compete non renewables on a level market field on their own merits.
That'd be a change that wouldn't easily be reversed, and would have a far greater chance of becoming permanent.

All the renewables programs that live off of government funded life support, they'll never be able to accomplish that without the force of the government gun.
 
Director Comey: fired
....Then, there's the Iran nuclear deal

Your recollection is a fantasy land.

So which crimes during the Obama 8 years? None. Fact != fantasy.

Trump's at 5+ felons or felony indictments, but the best is yet to come. Stay tuned.
 
So which crimes during the Obama 8 years? None. Fact != fantasy.

Trump's at 5+ felons or felony indictments, but the best is yet to come. Stay tuned.

The Obama web of corruption is unraveling. We see it in the firings and forced departures at the FBI.
The best is yet to come. Stay tuned.
 
The Obama web of corruption is unraveling. We see it in the firings and forced departures at the FBI.
The best is yet to come. Stay tuned.

It appears that your opinion of the intelligence level and moral standards of all those Republicans who have been investigating the Clintons and Obama adminstration for the past 6 or 7 years is that the GOPers are all a bunch of dunces with interest only in the money they receive from the gullible and those actually in control.
 
It appears that your opinion of the intelligence level and moral standards of all those Republicans who have been investigating the Clintons and Obama adminstration for the past 6 or 7 years is that the GOPers are all a bunch of dunces with interest only in the money they receive from the gullible and those actually in control.
Actually, marginal competence would be more apt.

Sent from my HTC6515LVW using Tapatalk
 
It appears that your opinion of the intelligence level and moral standards of all those Republicans who have been investigating the Clintons and Obama adminstration for the past 6 or 7 years is that the GOPers are all a bunch of dunces with interest only in the money they receive from the gullible and those actually in control.

Actually, marginal competence would be more apt.

Sent from my HTC6515LVW using Tapatalk

Expanding my comment.

I say marginal competence from the stand point that in hearings with witnesses, there is mostly pointless and ineffective grand standing.

You'd think that given the information the committee chairs had before hand that they'd ask far harder and more probing and revealing questions of the witness in search of the truth, but no, what we get is just silly and ineffective grand standing from one side, and bickering and fauxrage from the other side, alternating each time the other side asks a question.

"I'd give you a purple heart" WTF?

There are a few that don't seem to fall into this grandstanding, but then, I suppose it depends on which political blinkers you are wearing at the time.

Seems to me that any congressman or senator appointed to a committee chair that is going to interview witnesses should have to have a course in 'principals of being a prosecutor' so that they can construct and pose a 1/2 decent question to the witness.

So, yes, marginally competent.
 
Back
Top Bottom