• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

5 takeaways from an FBI agent's explosive, marathon congressional hearing

Yes, you are very confused. Good to know we agree.

Yea if you could make a sentence a person could understand there would be no confusion. Bone up on your English sentence structure.

Good Buy :2wave:
 
The question isnt nonsense. Your supposed rationale for not answering it, however, is.

Since I am NOT "defending Mr. Strzok" NOW, your question "Would you be defending him as you are now?" (emphasis added) is meaningless.
 
Yea if you could make a sentence a person could understand there would be no confusion. Bone up on your English sentence structure.

Good Buy :2wave:

If You say so.
Chow.....
 
Lets do a little thought experiment. Imagine the liberal hero, Peter Strzok, were the lead in an investigation of, lets say Martin Luther King. And during that investigation it was learned that he had texted his girlfriend a series of invectives against MLK; called him the N-word, hoped to see him jailed, thought his ascension would destroy the country etc. Then when questioned, claimed he wasnt biased and would never let his opinions effect his actions. Would you be defending him as you are now?

Or substitute Hillary for Trump in his texts, and Democrats everywhere would be even MORE insane than they currently are... if that is possible.......

Crooked Hillary outspent Trump 2 to 1 and CHEATED on the debates in addition to having the full support of virtually all media, and she STILL LOST!

That is a miracle.
 
Since I am NOT "defending Mr. Strzok" NOW, your question "Would you be defending him as you are now?" (emphasis added) is meaningless.

Terrific, you are not 'defending him.' Care to address the post now?
 
Terrific, you are not 'defending him.' Care to address the post now?

Sorry, I don't respond to "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" questions the way that you appear to think that everyone should.
 
Sorry, I don't respond to "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" questions the way that you appear to think that everyone should.

Nice lie. If you ever muster up the courage to actually address the post, Ill be here.
 
Nice lie. If you ever muster up the courage to actually address the post, Ill be here.

Isn't it frustrating to find someone who doesn't fall into the jejune,sophomoric, infantile "logic traps" you like to attempt to set?
 
Back
Top Bottom