• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

LEVIN DROPS A MOAB: New Revelation Mueller’s Lawyers Obtained ‘Special Status’ Show Probe is Unconst

Helix said:
it's possible. however, we already know that his lawyer allegedly has a secret bribe account (that isn't secret anymore,) and that the bribes are being used as hush money to pay off porn stars. at most points in our history, that alone would have been more than enough to remove him from office. Trumpists certainly have something to be worried about, which is why most of them seem to support shutting down the investigation before it concludes on its own.
Click to expand...

Can you cite the law which states someone cannot pay for non-disclosure?

If it involves a crime, I can understand it. But having sex with a porn star a dozen years ago (as is claimed), is not a crime.

If it is the case, Harvey Weinstein would be prosecuted not only for rape, but entering into multiple non-disclosure agreements.

Skippy Mueller’s investigation is no longer about what Russia did in the election. That’s what is being argued.

Further, the manner which he has acted, and appointed others with authority... has revealed his position of authority under the Constitution is one which demands the President appoint him.

That pesky Constitution... we know Leftists don’t like it... but it is the contract between our government and the people. Of course... Leftists around the world aren’t known for living up to their contracts.
 
Last edited:
zimmer said:
Can you cite the law which states someone cannot pay for non-disclosure?

If it involves a crime, I can understand it. But having sex with a porn star a dozen years ago (as is claimed), is not a crime.

If it is the case, Harvey Weinstein would be prosecuted not only for rape, but entering into multiple non-disclosure agreements.
Click to expand...

it's possible that paying off affairs with secret bribes might become a problem at some point.
 
chuckiechan said:
As they say “you are assuming facts not in evidence”. These people are used to getting their way. You are assuming since these people are the are the “Honest Injun” FBI after all, they would not bend the rules to get a scalp.

You bet your ass they would. The role of the Juducary is “justice” not convictions any means necessary, or score settling, or outrageous demands for testimony vs 25 year sentences for stepping in legal traps set by the FBI. The Federal guidelines for plea bargains have been raped by Meuller and his lynch mob.

It’s time people see what kind of a monster they have created.
Click to expand...

Agreed. What we are seeing now is the ultimate damage that the influence of the Bill and Hillary Clinton kabul has inflicted on politics and American government. it will be quite some time before the reputations of the FBI, the FISA Court, and the Justice department recovers.
 
Helix said:
it's possible. however, we already know that his lawyer allegedly has a secret bribe account (that isn't secret anymore,) and that the bribes are being used as hush money to pay off porn stars. at most points in our history, that alone would have been more than enough to remove him from office. Trumpists certainly have something to be worried about, which is why most of them seem to support shutting down the investigation before it concludes on its own.
Click to expand...

Don't you remember? The Clinton presidency taught us that extra marital affairs and porn stars don't matter.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Don't you remember? The Clinton presidency taught us that extra marital affairs and porn stars don't matter.
Click to expand...

it did? he was impeached for lying about a blow job.
 
ObamacareFail said:
It's a fake scandal to begin with.
Click to expand...

Thanks for proving my point. You're not going to look at the evidence at all. What does that say about you?
 
Helix said:
it did? he was impeached for lying about a blow job.
Click to expand...

No.....actually he was impeached for lying under oath and obstruction of justice. Perjury is a felony.
 
Deuce said:
Thanks for proving my point. You're not going to look at the evidence at all. What does that say about you?
Click to expand...

Who said i would not look at evidence. Try presenting some.
 
Deuce said:
Context. Mueller's report.
Click to expand...

Last time I checked, Muellers report has not been released as at the moment he is still carrying out the nonsense partisan witch hunt. If he ever releases it, I will look at any evidence presented.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Last time I checked, Muellers report has not been released as at the moment he is still carrying out the nonsense partisan witch hunt. If he ever releases it, I will look at any evidence presented.
Click to expand...

I don't think you will. Because it's all fake news, right?
 
Deuce said:
I don't think you will. Because it's all fake news, right?
Click to expand...

If you are going to claim to speak for me, I'll move on. It's like you are having a conversation with yourself.
 
ObamacareFail said:
No.....actually he was impeached for lying under oath and obstruction of justice. Perjury is a felony.
Click to expand...

man, Sessions had better look out, then.

:lol:

but that's different because he's a Republican.
 
Helix said:
it's possible that paying off affairs with secret bribes might become a problem at some point.
Click to expand...

What secret bribes?

Are you talking about Hillary’s time at State?

PS. Non-disclose agreements are legal contracts.
 
Helix said:
man, Sessions had better look out, then.

:lol:

but that's different because he's a Republican.
Click to expand...

Why? Sessions did not perjure himself. He answered the question asked by the democrat boob groping Senator honestly in the context it was asked. A chance encounter with a Russian diplomat in the congressional cafeteria for instance is not collusion. Clinton lied outright, not just one time but many.
 
chuckiechan said:
As they say “you are assuming facts not in evidence”. These people are used to getting their way. You are assuming since these people are the are the “Honest Injun” FBI after all, they would not bend the rules to get a scalp.

You bet your ass they would. The role of the Juducary is “justice” not convictions any means necessary, or score settling, or outrageous demands for testimony vs 25 year sentences for stepping in legal traps set by the FBI. The Federal guidelines for plea bargains have been raped by Meuller and his lynch mob.

It’s time people see what kind of a monster they have created.
Click to expand...

Well done. You've officially transitioned into an FBI-hater.

Hopefully you can avoid ever needing them in your lifetime. Wouldn't want to be indebted to those scalpers and rapists.
 
tres borrachos said:
Well done. You've officially transitioned into an FBI-hater.

Hopefully you can avoid ever needing them in your lifetime. Wouldn't want to be indebted to those scalpers and rapists.
Click to expand...

The Rank and File aren't the problem. I hear some are requesting that they be subpoenaed. So you can call me a "FBI Deep State" hater. It cracks me up. The "little people" like us on one side or the other seem to think that these abuses don't amount to anything more than corruption by "my team" so it's OK since "your team" will never be in office

Well let me remind you of who is in office now. If the abuses of "Spygate" go un punished, then the message is "It's OK", and now the shoe will be on the other foot, and Trump will be free to use it against you. The whole thing is evil. There are three parties here - the targets, the targeters, and our system of picking our leaders. And it hinges on the question of whether it is legal to use state power against the opposing party.

You want Trump going after your candidates next? Your candidate will be tarred and feathered before they get into the primary. Kamila Harris, Cory Booker, Oprah, Biden, etc. Hear that sizzle? That is Trump's intelligence services sauteing your candidates with impunity with all the tools of the federal government. And you got it coming.
 
chuckiechan said:
The Rank and File aren't the problem. I hear some are requesting that they be subpoenaed. So you can call me a "FBI Deep State" hater. It cracks me up. The "little people" like us on one side or the other seem to think that these abuses don't amount to anything more than corruption by "my team" so it's OK since "your team" will never be in office

Well let me remind you of who is in office now. If the abuses of "Spygate" go un punished, then the message is "It's OK", and now the shoe will be on the other foot, and Trump will be free to use it against you. The whole thing is evil. There are three parties here - the targets, the targeters, and our system of picking our leaders. And it hinges on the question of whether it is legal to use state power against the opposing party.

You want Trump going after your candidates next? Your candidate will be tarred and feathered before they get into the primary. Kamila Harris, Cory Booker, Oprah, Biden, etc. Hear that sizzle? That is Trump's intelligence services sauteing your candidates with impunity with all the tools of the federal government. And you got it coming.
Click to expand...

I didn't call you an "FBI Deep State hater" because I'm not in the Conspiracy Theory forum, and I post in facts.

My candidate in 2020 is John Kasich, who will hopefully primary Trump, or Marco Rubio, who will hopefully also do the same thing. Trump will be going after those people. And the real Republicans who don't see boogeymen at every turn will support one of them instead of the lying fraud in the White House today.

Thanks for the warning that Trump would spy on his political opponents. Not at all surprised to read that he's that corrupt.
 
tres borrachos said:
I didn't call you an "FBI Deep State hater" because I'm not in the Conspiracy Theory forum, and I post in facts.

My candidate in 2020 is John Kasich, who will hopefully primary Trump, or Marco Rubio, who will hopefully also do the same thing. Trump will be going after those people. And the real Republicans who don't see boogeymen at every turn will support one of them instead of the lying fraud in the White House today.

Thanks for the warning that Trump would spy on his political opponents. Not at all surprised to read that he's that corrupt.
Click to expand...

Your people have made corruption legal so far. You have nothing on Trump and we have everything on Obama. And Kasich? Call him and tell him to go for it. The democrats are looking for another person to shaft the middle class.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom