Bombshell: FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

Uh oh....

This doesn't even count the fees for Bill and millions of Russian cash donated to the ClintonSlushFundation.

Ain't America great (again)!




Bombshell: FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.

The press continues to feed the dying Russia collusion conspiracy theory, spending Friday’s news cycle regurgitating Democrat talking points from the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia.

Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

That lawsuit, filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

It'll be interesting to see where that suit leads, but don't get too excited, I can see it being dismissed.

There was/is a wide range of shady Democrat party activity before and during the election. In 2016, everyone thought Hillary was going to win the presidency. If that had happened all the corruption, would have been swept under the rug like Obama did. The swamp would have been able to intimate anyone who tried to bring this up, if Hillary had been in power. The Justice Department and FBI would have become a tool.

When Trump won, to everyone's surprise, the cover up was not as easy to do. This is why the Democrats invested so much into demonizing Trump, with the hope either he would be pressured to look the other way, or the Democrats could reassume power and cover up from the top. All the fake news was part of this strategy. Media moguls may be charged with crimes when all is said and done. Trump has been very durable, and people inside of government have been emboldened to do what is right. Now the crimes are finally coming out, just in time for the midterms.

Trump, during the campaign was running on the slogans, Crooked Hillary and Drain the Swamp. The question I often asked myself was, how did Trump know these things ahead of the investigations? The answer appears to be that the corruption and the swamp was well known in Washington, but the fear of intimidation was also very high. Nobody dared take on the swamp.

As an analogy, Washington was sort of like a city business district, that knows the mafia is shaking everyone down. However, everyone is afraid to say anything, except in private. Trump learned from the rumors. It was better to shut up and bend over than be singled out. Trump, after this election, was like the new sheriff in town, in the movie Walking Tall. He decided to do his job and take on the corruption. It was tough at first but soon the members of the community started to gain confidence. Walking Tall Trump, used Twitter as his walking tall club.

The Democrat party reign of intimidation, fear and terror is coming to end.

MrMike said:

Uh oh....

This doesn't even count the fees for Bill and millions of Russian cash donated to the ClintonSlushFundation.

Ain't America great (again)!

Bombshell: FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.

The press continues to feed the dying Russia collusion conspiracy theory, spending Friday’s news cycle regurgitating Democrat talking points from the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia.

Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

That lawsuit, filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

Click to expand...

Well, this appears to be what can be characterized as 'fake news'. Look at the indications . Fuming against 'mainstream media'. The use of highly emotionally charged . words.. and twisting of facts to make it appear to be other than it is.

RAMOSS said:

Well, this appears to be what can be characterized as 'fake news'. Look at the indications . Fuming against 'mainstream media'. The use of highly emotionally charged . words.. and twisting of facts to make it appear to be other than it is.

Click to expand...

I didn't post a story by CNN or MSNBC so the twisting of facts to make something appear other than it is... didn't happen

Have a nice globally warmed carbon-offset credit filled day!

RAMOSS said:

Well, this appears to be what can be characterized as 'fake news'. Look at the indications . Fuming against 'mainstream media'. The use of highly emotionally charged . words.. and twisting of facts to make it appear to be other than it is.

Click to expand...

The lawsuit filed isn't fake, it was filed. Whether or not you believe the summation at the link is irrelevant, the link to the filing is there.

Every source of that claims this are biased, opinionated right wing rhetoric.

And here you go https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...butions/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dff3f0fd508a

What was behind Rooney’s claim that Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign possibly received millions in illegal money? It was the first time a member of Congress had referred to a Federal Election Commission complaint lodged by a pro-Trump super PAC against Clinton and most state Democratic parties.

In the complaint, the Committee to Defend the President asked the FEC to determine whether the defeated Democrat engaged in “unprecedented, massive, nationwide multimillion-dollar conspiracy” to allow large donors to spread more money around. The “conspiracy,” however, may have simply taken advantage of new loopholes in campaign finance law — loopholes expanded after a Supreme Court victory by the lawyer who filed the new complaint.

Click to expand...

And as is predictable for dishonest right wing bull****, oh look, go digging for the reality and you will easily find it. Somehow this turns into money laundering. Wow, a complaint a pro Trump Super Pac somehow equates to Clinton laundering 85 million

What a joke the right is

RAMOSS said:

Well, this appears to be what can be characterized as 'fake news'. Look at the indications . Fuming against 'mainstream media'. The use of highly emotionally charged . words.. and twisting of facts to make it appear to be other than it is.

Click to expand...

It seems that all other agencies carrying the story are linking back to the same source.

Sampson Simpson said:

Every source of that claims this are biased, opinionated right wing rhetoric.

And here you go https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...butions/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dff3f0fd508a



And as is predictable for dishonest right wing bull****, oh look, go digging for the reality and you will easily find it. Somehow this turns into money laundering. Wow, a complaint a pro Trump Super Pac somehow equates to Clinton laundering 85 million

What a joke the right is

Click to expand...

The article rightfully points to wait and see. They didn't dismiss the possibility outright. So we have a claim that might be true or not.

Sampson Simpson said:

Every source of that claims this are biased, opinionated right wing rhetoric.

And here you go https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...butions/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dff3f0fd508a



And as is predictable for dishonest right wing bull****, oh look, go digging for the reality and you will easily find it. Somehow this turns into money laundering. Wow, a complaint a pro Trump Super Pac somehow equates to Clinton laundering 85 million

What a joke the right is

Click to expand...

And its a really bad joke on the American people.

MrMike said:

Uh oh....

This doesn't even count the fees for Bill and millions of Russian cash donated to the ClintonSlushFundation.

Ain't America great (again)!

Bombshell: FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.

The press continues to feed the dying Russia collusion conspiracy theory, spending Friday’s news cycle regurgitating Democrat talking points from the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia.

Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

That lawsuit, filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

Click to expand...

And that doesn't include the money laundered through Perkins-Coie (Marc Elias) to Fusion to Steele to Russian agents.
If it was undeclared, and it looks like it was, it seems too indisputable to be shrugged off.

bubbabgone said:

And that doesn't include the money laundered through Perkins-Coie (Marc Elias) to Fusion to Steele to Russian agents.
If it was undeclared, and it looks like it was, it seems too indisputable to be shrugged off.

Click to expand...

And...

MrMike said:

And...

Click to expand...

Allegedly, Podesta's own version of the Boston Tea Party?

MrMike said:

And...

Click to expand...

Those musta been the good Russians.
The ones who paid the Podesta Group to lobby the US Gov't.

Sampson Simpson said:

Every source of that claims this are biased, opinionated right wing rhetoric.

And here you go https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...butions/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dff3f0fd508a



And as is predictable for dishonest right wing bull****, oh look, go digging for the reality and you will easily find it. Somehow this turns into money laundering. Wow, a complaint a pro Trump Super Pac somehow equates to Clinton laundering 85 million

What a joke the right is

Click to expand...

I don't get it.

Why do some cons seem almost proud to show over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over
they are so easily punked? Makes no sense.

You'd think after the first couple hundred times (at least !) they'd say to themselves...hey, maybe I should employ a little skepticism when lurking among poison wells.

MrMike said:

And...

Click to expand...

Very cute, Mikey.

From "the god of rage" files -- you post a jpg of a Breitbart-group piece of garbage circulating months before the 2016 election. LOL

You guys are a friggin' hoot.

Paperview said:

Very cute, Mikey.

From "the god of rage" files -- you post a jpg of a Breitbart-group piece of garbage circulating months before the 2016 election. LOL

You guys are a friggin' hoot.

Click to expand...

Yet, it's true...

I don't blame you for being uncomfortable about the Clinton cabals ties to Russia

MrMike said:

Yet, it's true...

I don't blame you for being uncomfortable about the Clinton cabals ties to Russia

Click to expand...

You enjoy embarrassing yourself, apparently.


Carrion.

Paperview said:

I don't get it.

Why do some cons seem almost proud to show over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over
they are so easily punked? Makes no sense.

You'd think after the first couple hundred times (at least !) they'd say to themselves...hey, maybe I should employ a little skepticism when lurking among poison wells.

Click to expand...

That's why I think many of them are just trolling. I have a hard time imagining people are this dumb. BUt then again, look at the world and the history of humanity, so many people really are that dumb

Sampson Simpson said:

That's why I think many of them are just trolling. I have a hard time imagining people are this dumb. BUt then again, look at the world and the history of humanity, so many people really are that dumb

Click to expand...

In the OPs defense, there is a morsel of there there

http://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/feclawsuit.pdf

Paperview said:

You enjoy embarrassing yourself, apparently.


Carrion.

Click to expand...

Sampson Simpson said:

That's why I think many of them are just trolling. I have a hard time imagining people are this dumb. BUt then again, look at the world and the history of humanity, so many people really are that dumb

Click to expand...

Buuuuuut ... is the claim about the Podestas true or not? Isn't that what matters?
There are a lot of sources (including Salon, Forbes, and Politico...) that carried stories like that about the Podesta Group.
Just what don't you accept?

Lovebug said:

In the OPs defense, there is a morsel of there there

http://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/feclawsuit.pdf

Click to expand...

I saw that the other day.
Concerning the slippery nature of what was the Clinton Campaign (ask Donna Brazile and poor Bernie) there appears to be a whole loaf rather than a morsel there.
But it might be a matter of them simply taking advantage of loopholes in the rules big enough for Hillary's whatever to pass through.

I think there's more of an opportunity in the Fusion/Steele/dossier funding debacle.
Believe it or not, there are some people who think that if money changes hands it exonerates the original source when it pays for shady deals.

bubbabgone said:

I saw that the other day.
Concerning the slippery nature of what was the Clinton Campaign (ask Donna Brazile and poor Bernie) there appears to be a whole loaf rather than a morsel there.
But it might be a matter of them simply taking advantage of loopholes in the rules big enough for Hillary's whatever to pass through.

I think there's more of an opportunity in the Fusion/Steele/dossier funding debacle.
Believe it or not, there are some people who think that if money changes hands it exonerates the original source when it pays for shady deals.

Click to expand...

Yeah, I'll just wait until they tell us what we are allowed to know. Nuttin we can do about it.

Look, every damn week for years now, the connie rags come out with some *bombshell* that's going to put away Clinton -- and it pretty much always fizzles into nothing, yet because these rags know how gullible and Pavlovian so many cons are, they keep dredging it out, week after week, never learning a damn thing from the previous 1000 times you've been burnt.

These rags come to rely on the time-tested knowledge so many on the right have absolutely broken (or never had them to begin with) bull **** meters, exhibit the attention span of a flea, and a memory to match.

hanger4 said:

The lawsuit filed isn't fake, it was filed. Whether or not you believe the summation at the link is irrelevant, the link to the filing is there.

Click to expand...

But the charactisation about the facts is wrong.Considering the FACTS, I am sure the lawsuit will be summarily dismissed. Lots of frivolous lawsuits are filed all the time.