• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stormy Daniels took a lie detector test about affair with Trump — and passed

Stormy lawyer and Stormy are both hyping up the unprotected sex/dna testing parts of the NDA. I think a kid's involved
Well, that's quite a laep!

Has anyone done a timeline between their affair, and her kid?
 
Look...

The Trump mob is NEVER going to change their stance unless and unil they find out how much $ he has soaked them for.

In this instance there is no threat to his presidency, he could have ****ed her in the Oval Orifice if he liked and nothing could be done about it.

I want to know the deepest secretes of this individual (I have had to stop calling him a man having a woman sign an agreement that she's n her own if they make an embryo is not manhood) .

As each day passes, my previous position is wiped away with something new, something more horrid, another layer of slime hiding another layer of slime. I want it all in the open and understood, no propaganda.

I believe there is enough there that would create the thought "lest we forget" anytime his picture arises.

We are not dealing with anything remotely related to advanced humanity.
Well said!
 
Even if this is true, and even if Trump admits to it. Why should I care?
 
Last week DJT was happy with his legal team. Now it seems there are two more mouth (well fed) to feed......
I'll never forget the day he claimed we should vote for him, because HRC will have legal distractions! :lamo
 
Well, that's quite a laep!

Has anyone done a timeline between their affair, and her kid?

I like to look between the lines. This is plain as day. The kid the public knows about is 7 years old but no pics online.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well, that's quite a laep!

Has anyone done a timeline between their affair, and her kid?

I’ll get right on that...right after I finish doing all the things in my life I actually care about.

;)
 
Only to idiots who think a lie detector is a meaningful way to determine if someone is lying.
You may want to examine the veracity of your claim, and how it coexists with the ad hominem argument you tossed out, in light of the irony it displays.
 
I like to look between the lines. This is plain as day. The kid the public knows about is 7 years old but no pics online.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, 7 y.o. =/= 2006.
 
Look...

The Trump mob is NEVER going to change their stance unless and unil they find out how much $ he has soaked them for.

In this instance there is no threat to his presidency, he could have ****ed her in the Oval Orifice if he liked and nothing could be done about it.

I want to know the deepest secretes of this individual (I have had to stop calling him a man having a woman sign an agreement that she's n her own if they make an embryo is not manhood) .

As each day passes, my previous position is wiped away with something new, something more horrid, another layer of slime hiding another layer of slime. I want it all in the open and understood, no propaganda.

I believe there is enough there that would create the thought "lest we forget" anytime his picture arises.

We are not dealing with anything remotely related to advanced humanity.




Hillary said, "anyone that can be baited by a tweet..........." I say any voters that can be manipulated by Facebook.................sometime we, the people, get what we deserve.

This too shall pass.
 
2006 affair = 2007 birth = 11 y.o. kid.

understand, but she is listed as having a younger child. What possibly can be revealed in the 60 minutes piece that will amount to anything? Can you imagine, if there is a child involved, what the future ramifications could be?
 
understand, but she is listed as having a younger child. What possibly can be revealed in the 60 minutes piece that will amount to anything? Can you imagine, if there is a child involved, what the future ramifications could be?
I think a Trump kid is a far reach here. She would not have settled for only 130k, in that case.
 
Hillary said, "anyone that can be baited by a tweet..........." I say any voters that can be manipulated by Facebook.................sometime we, the people, get what we deserve.

This too shall pass.



Oddly that story is getting huge play here. Cambridge Analytica is based in Ontario and while they claim they didn't use data, however this guy says different;

Who is Christopher Wylie? How a B.C. high school dropout set out on path to political data harvesting - British Columbia - CBC News
He describes himself as the gay Canadian vegan who somehow ended up creating "Steve Bannon's psychological warfare mindf--k tool."

A report out today by Canadian Press said in 2009 Wylie lost his job in the office of former federal Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff for pushing a nascent form of the controversial data-harvesting technique.

I am looking for the article, it appears we have a quaint old law that would apply here.

Canada's privacy commissioner is likewise probing the company.
 
Look...

The Trump mob is NEVER going to change their stance unless and unil they find out how much $ he has soaked them for.

In this instance there is no threat to his presidency, he could have ****ed her in the Oval Orifice if he liked and nothing could be done about it.

I want to know the deepest secretes of this individual (I have had to stop calling him a man having a woman sign an agreement that she's n her own if they make an embryo is not manhood) .

As each day passes, my previous position is wiped away with something new, something more horrid, another layer of slime hiding another layer of slime. I want it all in the open and understood, no propaganda.

I believe there is enough there that would create the thought "lest we forget" anytime his picture arises.

We are not dealing with anything remotely related to advanced humanity.



I have to admit I feel a little hypocritical, I have no respect for him and his affairs.

However I am jealous of hell of JFK's weekend with Marilyn Monroe in the East wing when she ew directly from Timothy learys compound in Mexico.

Just like I always told the love of my life before she passed, I'm not a cheater but but when I was young there is not a chance I would turn down the fantasy of a dosed weekend with Marilyn under the influence of a pure owsley Stanley product.

She always said she would understand that one.

That being said, I wouldn't buy stormy Daniels a drink.

But just the fact I could be tempted makes me feel a touch hypocritical....
 
I have to admit I feel a little hypocritical, I have no respect for him and his affairs.

However I am jealous of hell of JFK's weekend with Marilyn Monroe in the East wing when she ew directly from Timothy learys compound in Mexico.

Just like I always told the love of my life before she passed, I'm not a cheater but but when I was young there is not a chance I would turn down the fantasy of a dosed weekend with Marilyn under the influence of a pure owsley Stanley product.

She always said she would understand that one.

That being said, I wouldn't buy stormy Daniels a drink.

But just the fact I could be tempted makes me feel a touch hypocritical....



She actually does nothing for me. I've never seen one of her films, but from the photos she is too "Hollywood cured" and way too big on top. But then with a hit or two of Owsley anything's good.
 
I have to admit I feel a little hypocritical, I have no respect for him and his affairs.

However I am jealous of hell of JFK's weekend with Marilyn Monroe in the East wing when she ew directly from Timothy learys compound in Mexico.

Just like I always told the love of my life before she passed, I'm not a cheater but but when I was young there is not a chance I would turn down the fantasy of a dosed weekend with Marilyn under the influence of a pure owsley Stanley product.

She always said she would understand that one.

That being said, I wouldn't buy stormy Daniels a drink.

But just the fact I could be tempted makes me feel a touch hypocritical....

But everybody thought Kennedy was a stud for bedding MM ( but then again MM oozed sexuality IMHO)

I have always said if Bill Clinton would have come out at first reports and said "Yep" I did her ( Monica Lewinsky) and gave us all a sly wink. It would have been a big nothing burger. His trouble came when he stood at his podium and wags his finger at us like we were a bunch of school children and told us a bold face lie.

As far as President Trump. I don't know why a man of his wealth would take the risk of sticking his thing in a porn "star".. Man I would not walk down the same side of the street as her..

And as far as the porn "Star" What does it say about her that she would have an affair with a married man? Especially DT!! What was her motivation?

And I don't know about calling her a "porn Star" I never heard of her until just recently.. And it was not because of her movies..

And I don't think Lie detector tests are admissible evidence in court yet.. and probably won't be..

djl
 
Last edited:
Yeah, it's not like there isn't plenty of other evidence..........David Dennison, not a peep, 130k paid out of a lawyers 'home equity line of credit'.............plenty more where that came from!
You can believe what you want. It is obvious she is in this for the money and will say whatever it is to get it.


You may want to examine the veracity of your claim, and how it coexists with the ad hominem argument you tossed out, in light of the irony it displays.

Hilarious.
As you were the one speaking about lie detector tests you might want to follow your own advice.


Wait.

You don't believe the media.
You don't believe the FBI
You don't trust the courts


Great way to claim innocence....simply distrust the source, thus didn't happen
Get a grip and stop creating irrelevant straw arguments.
 
She actually does nothing for me. I've never seen one of her films, but from the photos she is too "Hollywood cured" and way too big on top. But then with a hit or two of Owsley anything's good.

I used to have a life sized poster laminated on a Styrofoam backing. My mate would always turn it around, ( she lived in our bedroom) then she hid it and I didn't find it until after she passed. Now it is in a friends recording studio.

Personally I preferred Rachel, however the East wing party.....
 
Trump would break the machine with all his lies

Anyway, never doubted it. Trump has proven has had many sexual escapades, that's pretty obvious. And he's a scumbag when it comes to women. And he's a con man, nothing is shocking about him. Other than I thought he would at least make an attempt to be a president

He has made an attempt, this is the best he can do.
 
Back
Top Bottom