• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Porn Star Stormy Daniels tells all about President David Dennison March 26 on 60 minutes.

R

Rich123

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
754
Reaction score
198
Well the Golden Shower boy can't be too thrilled with this special but no reason for the rest of us to miss it. Tune in at 7 PM ESt on CBS and find out whether it's to Pee or not Pee, that is the question. Yes President David Dennison tried to give her at least 20,000,000 reason not to air her tell all story, but some how those 20,000,000 reasons didn't persuade her or her councel. So if 20,000,000 reason didn't slow her gait any, then this promises to be a whopper of a tell all.:2wave:
 
Is she going to angle for being a #METOO hero with a charge of sexual misconduct?

I figure likely so, that is her best play.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Prop not, I have not really watched TV in years. I will wait for the DP BrainTrust to tell me what happened.
Click to expand...
.
I don't have much use for most viewing on telivision these days either. I go for information. I know my text wasn't kind but there is nothing kind about a man who would deliberately hurt a man's chances of receiving a pension he earned. He did it . Got his boy Sessions to do the dirty work but he ,David Dennison was behind it.
 
Rich123 said:
.
I don't have much use for most viewing on telivision these days either. I go for information. I know my text wasn't kind but there is nothing kind about a man who would deliberately hurt a man's chances of receiving a pension he earned. He did it . Got his boy Sessions to do the dirty work but he ,David Dennison was behind it.
Click to expand...



Last I read the 60 Minutes broadcast was slated for the 25th Mar, has it been moved up?

A week is a lifetime in this climate....
 
Rich123 said:
.
I don't have much use for most viewing on telivision these days either. I go for information. I know my text wasn't kind but there is nothing kind about a man who would deliberately hurt a man's chances of receiving a pension he earned. He did it . Got his boy Sessions to do the dirty work but he ,David Dennison was behind it.
Click to expand...

When it comes to news TV is so much work for so little pay-off.

With Pod Casts and Video online we can at least fast forward, which helps.

But really text is by far the best, because we can skim and speedread and easily skip huge chunks of the boring parts....so many options.
 
Tabloid trash for people who have nothing better to do with their lives.

More productive to watch paint dry.
 
I'm very concerned about her lawyer's accusation of the physical intimidation of his client, apparently to be explained during the interview.

If it did occur in conjunction with Trump or his surrogates, in my mind that's quite the game changer. Big-time!

But if it came from some random person or unattached-to Trump supporter, after being seemingly alluded to by the lawyer as coming from the Trump camp, that's pretty damn dishonest and discrediting.
 
Chomsky said:
But if it came from some random person or unattached-to Trump supporter, after being seemingly alluded to by the lawyer as coming from the Trump camp, that's pretty damn dishonest and discrediting.
Click to expand...

And could get him a visit from the ABA.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
When it comes to news TV is so much work for so little pay-off.

With Pod Casts and Video online we can at least fast forward, which helps.

But really text is by far the best, because we can skim and speedread and easily skip huge chunks of the boring parts....so many options.
Click to expand...

That sounds good to me. When you say text for informatiion like breaking news, exactly how does that work?:confused::confused:
 
Chomsky said:
I'm very concerned about her lawyer's accusation of the physical intimidation of his client, apparently to be explained during the interview.

If it did occur in conjunction with Trump or his surrogates, in my mind that's quite the game changer. Big-time!

But if it came from some random person or unattached-to Trump supporter, after being seemingly alluded to by the lawyer as coming from the Trump camp, that's pretty damn dishonest and discrediting.
Click to expand...


Michael Avenetti, Ms. Daniels' lawyer, come across as sleazy, but all I have heard are positive things from bits and pieces on various news outlets. There is an interesting item in his Wikipedia bio:

"Avenatti later joined Greene Broillet & Wheeler, a Los Angeles boutique litigation firm. While there, he handled a number of high-profile cases, including a $10 million defamation case against Paris Hilton,[22] a successful idea-theft lawsuit relating to the show The Apprentice and against producers Mark Burnett and Donald Trump,[23] and a $40 million embezzlement lawsuit involving KPMG.[7][24]"


He seems to feel that he has a solid, (sordid), case. Prior history with Trump is an angle.
 
Rexedgar said:
Michael Avenetti, Ms. Daniels' lawyer, come across as sleazy, but all I have heard are positive things from bits and pieces on various news outlets. There is an interesting item in his Wikipedia bio:

"Avenatti later joined Greene Broillet & Wheeler, a Los Angeles boutique litigation firm. While there, he handled a number of high-profile cases, including a $10 million defamation case against Paris Hilton,[22] a successful idea-theft lawsuit relating to the show The Apprentice and against producers Mark Burnett and Donald Trump,[23] and a $40 million embezzlement lawsuit involving KPMG.[7][24]"


He seems to feel that he has a solid, (sordid), case. Prior history with Trump is an angle.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I read his bio in Wikipedia when he came on the scene.

I don't particularly see him as sleazy, but as street-wise, street-fighter, Italian. I've known other Italian hard-fighting lawyers like him, and have used lawyers like him. If you need a lawyer, don't mess around; get a Pit-Bull!
 
Rich123 said:
Well the Golden Shower boy can't be too thrilled with this special but no reason for the rest of us to miss it. Tune in at 7 PM ESt on CBS and find out whether it's to Pee or not Pee, that is the question. Yes President David Dennison tried to give her at least 20,000,000 reason not to air her tell all story, but some how those 20,000,000 reasons didn't persuade her or her councel. So if 20,000,000 reason didn't slow her gait any, then this promises to be a whopper of a tell all.:2wave:
Click to expand...

What is it we are supposed to learn from this interview other than she had an affair with Trump in 2006? Are you hoping to find out his penis size?
 
Chomsky said:
Yeah, I read his bio in Wikipedia when he came on the scene.

I don't particularly see him as sleazy, but as street-wise, street-fighter, Italian. I've known other Italian hard-fighting lawyers like him, and have used lawyers like him. If you need a lawyer, don't mess around; get a Pit-Bull!
Click to expand...


So what’s his payday?
 
Fletch said:
What is it we are supposed to learn from this interview other than she had an affair with Trump in 2006? Are you hoping to find out his penis size?
Click to expand...

We already know that, I think Little Marco revealed all.

I think it will be interesting to learn why 2 weeks before the election it was so important to silence this woman, while lots of others were just called liars.
Also, how she was paid might prove interesting. And there is the probability that she had to be silenced to keep Melania on board. It's great reality TV! Full circle.
 
Chomsky said:
Fame & Fortune.
Click to expand...

This is so true.....he'll be a star...a yuuuge star!
And..... "When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."----Donald Trump
 
JMR said:
We already know that, I think Little Marco revealed all.

I think it will be interesting to learn why 2 weeks before the election it was so important to silence this woman, while lots of others were just called liars.
Also, how she was paid might prove interesting. And there is the probability that she had to be silenced to keep Melania on board. It's great reality TV! Full circle.
Click to expand...

If you say so.
 
Chomsky said:
I'm very concerned about her lawyer's accusation of the physical intimidation of his client, apparently to be explained during the interview.

If it did occur in conjunction with Trump or his surrogates, in my mind that's quite the game changer. Big-time!

But if it came from some random person or unattached-to Trump supporter, after being seemingly alluded to by the lawyer as coming from the Trump camp, that's pretty damn dishonest and discrediting.
Click to expand...

Her Lawyer didn't allude to it. He has infatically stated that he has the proof.
 
Rexedgar said:
Michael Avenetti, Ms. Daniels' lawyer, come across as sleazy, but all I have heard are positive things from bits and pieces on various news outlets. There is an interesting item in his Wikipedia bio:

"Avenatti later joined Greene Broillet & Wheeler, a Los Angeles boutique litigation firm. While there, he handled a number of high-profile cases, including a $10 million defamation case against Paris Hilton,[22] a successful idea-theft lawsuit relating to the show The Apprentice and against producers Mark Burnett and Donald Trump,[23] and a $40 million embezzlement lawsuit involving KPMG.[7][24]"


He seems to feel that he has a solid, (sordid), case. Prior history with Trump is an angle.
Click to expand...

His case gets better every day thanks to David Dennison.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom