• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Cannot Beat Trump at his Own Game:

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
I mean this is pathetic. I have no idea what she was thinking stooping to his level. It doesn't matter if she is right, we gotta stop talking about an election that was almost 500 days ago!

Hillary Clinton recalled her loss in the 2016 US presidential election during a speech at the India Today Conclave 2018 in Mumbai on Saturday.

"If you look at the map of the United States, there's all that red in the middle where Trump won," Clinton said. "I win the coast, I win, you know, Illinois and Minnesota, places like that."

Hillary Clinton: I won in 'dynamic' places, Trump won 'backwards' - Business Insider
 
She has learned absolutely nothing about not putting large groups of folks off (down?). She is a hopelessly snobbish elite. It takes a special kind of idiot to lose to Trump but, then again, 16 did so in the republicant primary. I'd like to think that the 16 did that by splitting the "I like an experienced politician" vote. In the end I guess it came down to more never Hillary voters than never Trump voters in key states.
 
1) Clinton would have been a competent and able President.
2) She is completely tone deaf and continues to demonstrate why she was beaten by one of the world's worst human beings. By following her ego instead of accepting the reality that half the country hated her on a visceral level, she effectively broke the nation.

Both of these statements can be true simultaneously.
 
Last edited:
1) Clinton would have been a competent and able President.
2) She is completely tone deaf and continues to demonstrate why she was beaten by one of the world's worst human beings. By following her ego instead of accepting the reality that half the country hated her on a visceral level, she effectively broke the nation.

Both of these statements can be true simultaneously.

I couldn't agree more; but it's time for her to STFU and go dark for once in her life. The only things she and Trump have in common are a massive ego and a rabid need to seek out the limelight. I'm quite sick of both of them.
 
I couldn't agree more; but it's time for her to STFU and go dark for once in her life. The only things she and Trump have in common are a massive ego and a rabid need to seek out the limelight. I'm quite sick of both of them.

Well, at least Hill only shows up occasionally.
The Donald is an everyday blight on humanity.:roll:
 
Well, at least Hill only shows up occasionally.
What's worse is that she gets paid to "show up occasionally."

She's not just an attention whore, but a well paid one. Kinda like a Kardashian.
 
I mean this is pathetic. I have no idea what she was thinking stooping to his level. It doesn't matter if she is right, we gotta stop talking about an election that was almost 500 days ago!



Hillary Clinton: I won in 'dynamic' places, Trump won 'backwards' - Business Insider

First, that is her level, its always been

She also said she won States that represent the engine of the American economy ? She lost Texas, and we're not a backwards State by any means.
 
1) Clinton would have been a competent and able President.
2) She is completely tone deaf and continues to demonstrate why she was beaten by one of the world's worst human beings. By following her ego instead of accepting the reality that half the country hated her on a visceral level, she effectively broke the nation.

Both of these statements can be true simultaneously.

They are true simultaneously.
Hillary Clinton is a textbook example of an effete liberal snob, who manages to do her job well and fight for some pretty decent agendas, but at the heart of it all, she's still an effete liberal snob, and she comes off as one.
And if there is one thing working class people cannot stand, it's an effete snob.
They would rather be lied to outright by a ham handed con man who eats KFC and McDonald's like it's going out of style than preached to by an effete snob.
If there is one thing that did Hillary in, it was her personality.
 
She has learned absolutely nothing about not putting large groups of folks off (down?). She is a hopelessly snobbish elite. It takes a special kind of idiot to lose to Trump but, then again, 16 did so in the republicant primary. I'd like to think that the 16 did that by splitting the "I like an experienced politician" vote. In the end I guess it came down to more never Hillary voters than never Trump voters in key states.

That's exactly what happened. He started losing once it was down to basically two people, especially in closed primary states but he had too much momentum by that point and was actually pulling Democrat votes (why he did better in open primary states).
 
Queen wannabe Hillary knew she would not win the election. She knew going in there it would be a landslide victory. She needs to get over it and move on. America is tired of the 8 years of liberal/Demo regime and proven it...game over.
 
Back
Top Bottom